Semin Thromb Hemost 2005; 31(4): 464-469
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-916682
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Use of the Platelet Reactivity Index by Grotemeyer, Platelet Function Analyzer, and Retention Test Homburg To Monitor Therapy with Antiplatelet Drugs

Jürgen Koscielny1 , 2 , Tunay Aslan2 , Oliver Meyer2 , Holger Kiesewetter2 , Friedrich Jung3 , Christof Mrowietz3 , Reinhard Latza2
  • 1Professor, Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Charité Humboldt-University, Berlin, Germany
  • 2Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Charité Humboldt-University, Berlin, Germany
  • 3Institute for Cardiovascular Research, University-Clinic, Dresden, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 September 2005 (online)

Zoom Image

ABSTRACT

In 1974, Wu and Hoak described a method for determining circulating platelet aggregates. This method was modified by Grotemeyer in 1983.

The platelet reactivity index (PR) is based on the ratio of platelet aggregates in blood samples obtained in different buffer solutions. Platelet aggregates are resolved when blood is sampled in EDTA-buffer, but remain fixed when EDTA-formalin-buffer is used. Generally, the PR is preferred, because in vitro manipulations of platelets are not necessary, and the results are calculated. PR values above 1.05 are suspicious for elevated platelet aggregation. PR values above 1.2 indicate pathological changes in platelet aggregation. The PR is inexpensive (4.0 €) and rapid to perform.

PR values were used successfully to identify nonresponders to secondary prophylaxis with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), that is, patients suffering from stroke (33%) and patients after cardiac ischemia (18%).

Furthermore, elevated PR values correlated significantly with the incidence of arterial thromboembolic complications. The PR correlated well in our prospective study with values received from the retention test Homburg (RT-H) and the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100).

The data indicate that the values of the PR seem to be highly predictive for the evaluation of the ASA therapy. However, the PR is not feasible for the determination of the ASA overdosage.