The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): Prospective Analysis of Complications and Risk Factors in 4000 Colonic Snare Polypectomies

Background and Study Aims: Screening colonoscopy with polypectomy has been shown to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with colorectal cancer. However, there is a lack of large and systematic prospective studies of the complications of polypectomy.
Patients and Methods: Data on all snare polypectomies performed in 13 institutions (six hospitals and seven gastroenterology offices) were recorded prospectively during a 20-month period, including data on a 30-day follow-up period. The primary end points of the study were polypectomy complications, which were classed as ”major“ or ”minor“. Risk factors for complications were analyzed for both patient characteristics and polyp parameters.
Results: A total of 3976 snare polypectomies in 2257 patients (mean age 64.5 years) were included in the study. The mean polyp size was 1.1 cm, and 72 % were sessile. Complications occurred in 9.7 % of patients (6.1 % of polyps); 75 % of these complications were minor; and the mortality rate was zero. Multivariate regression analysis revealed polyp size as the main risk factor, both for complications overall (odds ratio 6.56, 95 %CI 4.45-9.67) and for major complications (odds ratio 31.01, 95 %CI 7.53-128.1). Right-sided polyp location was a significant risk factor for major complications (odds ratio 2.40, 95 %CI 1.34-4.28). Setting a cut-off value of 3 % as an acceptable rate for major complications, polyps larger than 1 cm in the right colon or 2 cm in the left colon, and multiple polyps carried an increased risk.
Conclusions: Colonoscopic polypectomy is associated with a 10 % rate of complications, but three-quarters of these are of minor clinical significance. More than 90 % of the complications can be managed conservatively if adequate endoscopic expertise is available. Guidelines for intensified follow-up after polypectomy should be based on the size, location, and number of a patient’s polyps.

References

• 1 Winawer S J, Zauber A G, Ho M N. et al . Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  329 1977-1981
• 2 Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D. et al . Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale - update based on new evidence.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  124 544-560
• 3 Sonnenberg A, Delco F. Cost-effectiveness of a single colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.  Arch Intern Med. 2002;  162 163-168
• 4 Nelson D B, McQuaid K R, Bond J H. et al . Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 307-314
• 5 Fasoli R, Repaci G, Comin U, Minoli G. A multi-centre North Italian prospective survey on some quality parameters in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists.  Dig Liver Dis. 2002;  34 833-841
• 6 Dell’Abate P, Iosca A, Galimberti A. et al . Endoscopic treatment of colorectal benign-appearing lesions 3 cm or larger.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 112-118
• 7 Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 620-627
• 8 Anderson M L, Pasha T M, Leighton J A. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year-study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 3418-3422
• 9 Parra-Blanco A, Kaminaga N, Kojima T. et al . Colonoscopic polypectomy with cutting current: is it safe?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 676-681
• 10 Gibbs D H, Opelka F G, Beck D E. et al . Postpolypectomy colonic hemorrhage.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 806-810
• 11 Binmoeller K F, Bohnhacker S, Seifert H. et al . Endoscopic snare excision of ”giant“ colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 183-188
• 12 Puchner R, Allinger S, Doblhofer M. et al . Complications of diagnostic and interventional colonoscopy [in German, English abstract].  Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1996;  108 142-146
• 13 Jentschura D, Raute M, Winter J. et al . Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract.  Surg Endosc. 1994;  8 672-676
• 14 Rosen L, Bub D, Reed J F, Nastasee S A. Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 1126-1131
• 15 Van Gossum A, Cozzoli A, Adler M. et al . Colonoscopic snare polypectomy: analysis of 1485 resections comparing two types of current.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  15 347-351
• 16 Walsh R M, Ackroyd F W, Shellito P C. Endoscopic resection of large sessile colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 303-309
• 17 Waye J D, Blair S L, Siroun Y. Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;  15 347-351
• 18 Reiertsen O, Skjoto J, Jacobsen C D, Rosseland A R. Complications of fiberoptic endoscopy: five years’ experience in a central hospital.  Endoscopy. 1987;  19 1-6
• 19 Hesterberg R, Stahlknecht C D, Sattler J, Bojahr U. Endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps [in German, English abstract].  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1987;  112 210-213
• 20 Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: an experience with 1955 polypectomies.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;  29 825-830
• 21 Macrae F A, Tan K G, Williams C B. Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies.  Gut. 1983;  24 376-383
• 22 Frühmorgen P, Demling L. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in the Federal Republic of Germany: results of an inquiry.  Endoscopy. 1979;  11 146-150
• 23 Rogers B HG, Silvis S, Nebel O T. et al . Complications of flexible colonoscopy and polypectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1975;  22 73-77
• 24 Geenen J E, Schmitt M G, Wu W C, Hogan W J. Major complications of colonoscopy: bleeding and perforation.  Dig Dis. 1975;  20 231-235
• 25 Berci G, Panish J F, Schapiro M, Corlin R. Complications of colonoscopy and polypectomy.  Gastroenterology. 1974;  67 584-585
• 26 Wexner S D, Garbus J E, Singh J J. A prospective analysis of 13 580 colonoscopies: re-evaluation of credentialing guidelines. SAGES Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 251-261
• 27 Bowles C J, Leicester R, Romaya C. et al . A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?.  Gut. 2004;  53 277-283
• 28 Zubarik R, Fleischer D E, Mastropietro C. et al . Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 322-328
• 29 Webb W A, McDaniel L, Jones L. Experience with 1000 colonoscopic polypectomies.  Ann Surg. 1985;  201 626-632
• 30 Garbay J R, Suc B, Rotman N. et al . Multicentre study of surgical complications of colonoscopy.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 42-44
• 31 Woods A, Sanowski R A, Wadas D D. et al . Eradication of diminutive polyps: a prospective evaluation of bipolar coagulation versus conventional biopsy removal.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 536-540
• 32 Birkmeyer J D, Stukel T A, Siewers A E. et al . Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  349 2117-2127
• 33 Birkmeyer J D, Siewers A E, Finlayson E V. et al . Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  346 1128-1137
• 34 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S. et al . Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 909-918
• 35 Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G. et al . Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 1-10