Pneumologie 2005; 59 - VPPRS_3
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-864629

Impact of an intratracheally applied recombinant Surfactant Apoprotein C on anaphylactic shock reactions in a guinea pig model of acute lung hypersensitivity

PG Germann 1, J Kemkowski 2
  • 1Investigative and Regulatory Pathology, Preclinical Safety Europe, Novartis Pharma AG, Schweiz
  • 2Institute of Pathology and Toxicology, Altana Pharma AG, Hamburg

The effect of the intratracheal administration of the recombinant SP-C surfactant apoprotein (rSP-C) with phospholipids (PL) in comparison to an ovalbumin induced anaphylactic shock reaction was studied in guinea pigs lungs.

Narcotized guinea pigs were challenged by intratracheal administration on test day 24/25 once with a suspension of rSP-C/PL (reconstituted suspension). These animals were priorily sensitized on test day 1, 3 and 5 intraperitoneally with rSP-C/PL suspension or with Ovalbumin (OV) respectively. The following groups were used to assess the anaphylactic lung shock symptoms: group 1: positive control, 1mg/kg OV protein, 2ml/kg application volume, (Appl. vol.), N: 5 animals; group 2: 1mg rSP-C/ 50mg PL / 0,5ml/kg Appl. vol., N: 10; group 3: 2mg rSP- / 100mg PL / 1,0ml/kg Appl. vol., N:10; group 4: 4mg rSP-C/ 200mg PL / 2,0ml/kg Appl. vol., N: 10. Clinical signs, mortality, lung weights and histopathological changes were evaluated. Additionally the lungs were investigated immunohistologically with polyclonal antibodies against rSP-C to determine pulmonary distribution of the intratracheal applied rSP-C.

In the OV-treated positive control group, all animals died within 4 minutes after intratracheal challenge, while only 1 animal of group 4 died probably due to an narcosis related respiratory arrest. In the rSP-C/PL treated groups, the lung weights showed a dose-related increase, but nevertheless all these rSP-C-treated groups showed a significant lower lung weight in comparison to the OV treated positive control group. The histopathology assessment of the lungs in the OV-treated animals revealed a severe generalised bronchoconstriction and a hyperemia in connection with a slight interstitial edema in all five animals. The rSP-C/PL-treated animals, which were sacrificed after 3 days, showed no bronchoconstriction but a slight increase in the severity of bronchus-associated infiltration with eosinophilic granulocytes and in the formation of peripheral emphysema, but with no dose-dependancy. A slight dose-dependent increase in the deposition of peribronchiolar eosinophilic foreign material was evident. In contrast to this, the number of lipid-loaden alveolar macrophages seemed to decrease with increasing doses of rSP-C/PL. The immunohistological investigation with a polyclonal antibody against rSP-C showed an intraalveolar distribution of the intratracheally applied rSP-C which is mainly located in the peribronchiolar alveolar parenchyma. A rSP-C-positive staining was visible within the cytoplasm of alveolar histiocytes, type II pneumocytes and also as an extracellulary rim along the alveolar walls. The polyclonal antibody showed no cross reaction with natural occuring SP-C-protein of the guinea pigs.

We conclude that the intratracheal application of the rSP-C surfactant containing phospholipids (PL) exhibits no significant risk of an anaphylactic shock reaction in this guinea pig lung hypersensitivity model. The immunohistological investigation with polyclonal antibodies against rSP-C demonstrated clearly the distribution of intratracheal applied material in this toxicological animal model.