Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-836604
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Motor Nerve Root Monitoring During Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Sequestrectomy Under General Anesthesia for Intra- and Extraforaminal Lumbar Disc Herniation
Elektrophysiologische Überwachung motorischer Nervenwurzelaktivität während der perkutanen transforaminalen Sequestrektomie bei intra- und extraforaminalen Bandscheibenvorfällen unter VollnarkosePublication History
Publication Date:
29 November 2005 (online)
Abstract
Introduction: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic sequestrectomy (PTFES) for intra- and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation (IHLD and EHLD) is usually performed under local anesthesia because the patient's full cooperation is necessary during surgery in order to reduce morbidity. This puts intraoperative stress on both the patient and the surgeon. The present study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of performing PTFES under general anesthesia using a new protocol with continuous intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM). Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients with IHLD and/or EHLD were treated by PTFES under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blocking agents. Free-run electromyography (EMG) recordings from characteristic muscles were monitored for the nerve root exiting through the intervertebral foramen at the level of surgery as well as those immediately above and below this level. The recorded potentials were visualized and analyzed on the monitoring screen. Additionally, the EMG activity was played to the surgeon via loudspeakers. Results: EMG-assisted endoscopic sequestrectomy was successfully completed in all 25 cases. Three patients showed complex repetitive discharge patterns already before the actual procedure, but these normalized upon removal of the sequester. Abnormal EMG changes in the form of intraoperative isolated spikes, phasic bursts, or tonic trains were recorded in 17 of the 25 cases. These occurred during placement of the endoscopic working channel in the area of the neuroforamen in 12 cases and during removal of the sequester in 6 cases. Spikes and bursts were evoked by direct contact with the nerve root or indirectly through traction or compression. Tonic discharge patterns, on the other hand, correlated with more severe mechanical stress caused for instance by compression or traction when the nerve root was fixed in the neuroforamen by the sequester. Conclusions: PTFES under general anesthesia is a safe and easy-to-perform technique for surgical management of intra- and/or extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation if combined with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. General anesthesia reduces intraoperative stress to a minimum, so that a larger number of patients may benefit from this minimally invasive procedure in future.
Zusammenfassung
Einleitung: Als minimalinvasive Operationstechnik für intra- und extraforaminale lumbale Bandscheibenvorfälle (IHLD und EHLD) steht die perkutane transforaminale endoskopische Sequestrektomie (PTFES) zur Verfügung. Diese Operationstechnik wird jedoch zumeist in Lokalanästhesie durchgeführt, da zur Reduzierung der intraoperativen Morbidität die Kooperation des wachen Patienten erforderlich ist. Das Ziel dieser Studie war es, ein neues Protokoll zu evaluieren, welches durch den Einsatz intraoperativer neurophysiologischer Untersuchungsmethoden die PTFES auch unter Vollnarkose erlaubt. Material und Methodik: Fünfundzwanzig Patienten wurden unter Vollnarkose (TIVA) ohne intraoperative Anwendung von Muskelrelaxantien endoskopisch an einem IHLD und/oder EHLD operiert. Für die intraoperative neurophysiologische Überwachung motorischer Nervenwurzelaktivität wurde ein freilaufendes Elektromyogramm (EMG) aus spezifischen Kennmuskeln, jeweils für das operierte Segment, sowie für das darüber und darunter liegende Segment abgeleitet. Die Potenziale wurden fortlaufend visualisiert, ausgewertet und die elektrophysiologischen Entladungsmuster per Lautsprecher für den Operateur hörbar gemacht. Ergebnisse: In allen 25 Fällen konnte die EMG-assistierte endoskopische Sequestrektomie erfolgreich durchgeführt werden. In 3 Fällen war bereits vor Beginn der eigentlichen Operation EMG-Aktivität in Form eines komplexen repetitiven Entladungsmusters zu registrieren. Diese normalisierten sich nach Sequesterentfernung. Pathologische EMG-Veränderungen in Form von intraoperativ aufgetretener singulärer „spike”, phasischer „burst” oder tonischer „train” Aktivität wurden in 17 der 25 Fälle registriert. Diese traten in 12 Fällen während der Platzierung des Endoskoparbeitsschaftes im Bereich des Neuroforamens und in 6 Fällen bei Entfernung des Sequesters auf. Spikes und bursts wurden dabei durch Berührung der Nervenwurzel bzw. durch indirekten Zug oder Druck ausgelöst. Das Auftreten von tonischen Entladungsmustern korrelierte hingegen mit einer stärkeren mechanischen Affektion der Nervenwurzel, z. B. durch Kompression oder Traktion der durch den Sequester im Neuroforamen fixierten Nervenwurzel. Schlussfolgerungen: Die Ergebnisse dieser Untersuchung zeigen, dass die PTFES auch unter Vollnarkose sicher und suffizient durchführbar ist, wenn die motorische Nervenwurzelaktivität mit Hilfe intraoperativer neurophysiologischer Untersuchungstechniken kontinuierlich kontrolliert wird. Hierdurch lässt sich die Lage der Nervenwurzel identifizieren und das Operationsrisiko minimieren. Durch Anwendung der Vollnarkose lässt sich ferner die intraoperative Belastung für den Patienten reduzieren, so dass diese Operationstechnik für eine größere Patientengruppe attraktiv und tolerabel wird.
Key words
transforaminal endoscopic sequestrectomy - general anesthesia - intraoperative electromyography - neurophysiological monitoring
Schlüsselwörter
transforaminale endoskopische Sequestrektomie - Vollnarkose - intraoperative Elektromyographie - neurophysiologisches Monitoring
References
- 1 National Institutes of Health (NIH) .Acoustic Neurinoma. Consens Statement (December 11-13, 1991). 9: 1-24
- 2 Abdullah A F, Ditto E W, Byrd E B, Williams R. Extreme-lateral lumbar disc herniations. Clinical syndrome and special problems of diagnosis. J Neurosurg. 1974; 41 229-234
- 3 Abdullah A F, Wolber P G, Warfield J R, Gunadi I K. Surgical management of extreme lateral lumbar disc herniations: review of 138 cases. Neurosurgery. 1988; 22 648-653
- 4 Brock M, Pedretti L, Mayer H M. The results of “lumbar disc surgery” following unsuccessful chemonucleolysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991; 112 65-70
- 5 Brown M D. Update on chemonucleolysis. Spine. 1996; 21 (24 Suppl) 62-68
- 6 Casey K F, Chang M K, O'Brien E D, Yuan H A, McCullen G M, Schaffer J, Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy: Comparison of preoperative and postoperative imaging studies. Arthroscopy. 1997; 13 438-445
- 7 Darden B V, Wade J F, Alexander R, Wood K E, Rhyne A L, Hicks J R. Far lateral disc herniations treated by microscopic fragment excision. Techniques and results. Spine. 1995; 20 1500-1505
- 8 Delgado T E, Buchheit W A, Rosenholtz H R, Chrissian S. Intraoperative monitoring of facial muscle evoked responses obtained by intracranial stimulation of the facial nerve: A more accurate technique for facial nerve dissection. Neurosurgery. 1979; 4 418-421
- 9 Ditsworth D A. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy and reconfiguration: A postero-lateral approach into the spinal canal. Surg Neurol. 1998; 49 588-597
- 10 Dullerud R, Nakstad P H. Side effects and complications of automated percutaneous lumbar nucleotomy. Neuroradiology. 1997; 39 282-285
- 11 Epstein N E. Evaluation of varied surgical approaches used in the management of 170 far-lateral lumbar disc herniations: indications and results. J Neurosurg. 1995; 83 648-656
- 12 Frazier W T. Anaesthetic requirements for spinal surgery and effective cord monitoring. In: Jones et al (eds). Handbook of Spinal Cord Monitoring. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Boston, London 1994; 44-58
- 13 Garrido E, Connaughton P N. Unilateral facetectomy approach for lateral lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg. 1991; 74 754-756
- 14 Harner S, Daube J, Ebersold M, Beatty C. Improved preservation of facial nerve function with use of electrical monitoring during removal os acoustic neurinomas. Mayo Clin Proc. 1987; 62 92-102
- 15 Jackson R P, Glah J J. Foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation: diagnosis and treatment. Spine. 1987; 12 577-585
- 16 Jou I M. The effects from lumbar nerve root transection in rats on spinal somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials. Spine. 2004; 29 147-155
- 17 Kambin P, Casey K F, O'Brien E D, Zhou L. Transforaminal arthroscopic decompression of lateral recess stenosis. J Neurosurg. 1996; 84 462-467
- 18 Kambin P, Zhou L. Arthroscopic discectomy of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthoped. 1997; 337 49-57
- 19 Kombos T, Suess O, Brock M. Kostenanalyse des intraoperativen neurophysiologischen Monitoring (IOM). Zentralbl Neurochir. 2002; 63 141-145
- 20 Kombos T, Suess O, Kern B C, Funk T, Pietilä T, Brock M. Can continuous intraoperative facial electromyography predict facial nerve function following cerebellopontine angle surgery?. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2000; 40 501-507
- 21 Lew S M, Mehalic T F, Fagone K L. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of far-lateral and foraminal lumbar disc herniations. J Neurosurg. 2001; 94 (2 Suppl) 216-220
- 22 Liebler W A. Percutaneous laser disc nucleotomy. Clin Orthoped. 1995; 310 58-66
- 23 Magliulo G, Petti R, Vincolo G M, Cristofari P, Ronzoni R. Facial nerve monitoring in skull base surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 1994; 108 557-559
- 24 Maroon J C, Quigley M R, Gleason P L. Is there a future for percutaneous intradiscal therapy?. Clin Neurosurg. 1996; 43 239-251
- 25 Maroon J C, Kopitnik T A, Schulhof L A, Abla A, Wilberger J E. Diagnosis and microsurgical approach to far-lateral disc herniation in the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg. 1990; 72 378-382
- 26 Mayer H M, Brock M. Differential therapy of lumbar intervertebral disk protrusion. Zentralbl Chir. 1989; 114 489-502
- 27 Patt S, Brock M, Mayer H M, Schreiner C, Pedretti L. Nucleus pulposus regeneration after chemonucleolysis with chymopapain. Spine. 1993; 18 227-231
- 28 Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Nadstawek J, Schramm J. Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery. 1996; 39 335-343
- 29 Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, Mehdian S M, Webb J K, Blumhardt L. Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 113 1082-1091
- 30 Prass R L, Lüders H. Acoustic (loudspeaker) facial electromyographic monitoring: Part 1. Evoked electromyographic activity during acoustic neuroma resection. Neurosurgery. 1986; 19 392-400
- 31 Ramsbacher J, Kern B C, Kombos T, Brock M. Transforaminal endoscopic sequestrectomy: Indications, operative technique and first clinical experience. Neurosurgery Quarterly. 2000; 10 224-228
- 32 Roggendorf W, Brock M, Gorge H H, Curio G. Morphological alterations of the degenerated lumbar disc following chemonucleolysis with chemopapain. J Neurosurg. 1984; 60 518-522
- 33 Romstöck J, Strauss C, Fahlbusch R. Continuous electromyographic monitoring of facial nerve function during cerebellopontine surgery. J Neurosurg. 2000; 93 586-593
- 34 Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1 000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neurinomas): The facial nerve - preservation and restitution of function. Neurosurgery. 1997; 40 684-694
- 35 Schramm J, Kurthen M. Recent developments in neurosurgical spinal cord monitoring. Paraplegia. 1992; 30 609-616
- 36 Sloan T B. Monitoring the brain and spinal cord. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2004; 42 1-23
- 37 Stucker R, Krug C, Reichelt A. Endoscopic treatment of intervertebral disk displacement. Percutaneous transforaminal access to the epidural space. Indications, technique and initial results. Orthopäde. 1997; 26 280-287
- 38 Taniguchi M, Schramm J. Motor evoked potentials facilitated by an additional peripheral nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991; 43 (Suppl) 202-211
- 39 Wiltse L L, Spencer C W. New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine. 1988; 13 696-706
Dr. med. O. Süss
Neurochirurgische Klinik · Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF)
Hindenburgdamm 30
12200 Berlin
Germany
Phone: +49/30/84 45 25 50
Fax: +49/30/84 45 42 56
Email: olaf.suess@charite.de