PDF herunterladen
Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 25(6): 661-671
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-860980
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Recognition and Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock

Steven M. Hollenberg1
  • 1Section of Cardiology, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Camden, New Jersey
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
22. Dezember 2004 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Cardiogenic shock has long been a difficult problem for clinicians. The most common cause is left ventricular pump failure after myocardial infarction, but other important causes include mechanical complications of infarction, right ventricular dysfunction, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass, valvular disease, and cardiomyopathy. Cardiogenic shock is the leading cause of in-hospital death after myocardial infarction. Despite advances in management of heart failure and acute myocardial infarction, clinical outcomes had remained frustratingly poor, with reported mortality rates ranging from 50 to 80%. Recently, however, survival rates have been improving. Improved understanding of the pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock has led to renewed emphasis on the notion that stunned or hibernating myocardium may recover function with hemodynamic support and restoration of flow. This concept has underscored the importance of expeditious initiation of supportive measures to maintain blood pressure and cardiac output, including both medications and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation. Finally, the theory that coronary revascularization would be beneficial by reversing the vicious cycle in which ischemia causes myocardial dysfunction, which in turn worsens ischemia, which had been supported by an extensive body of observational and registry studies, has now been strongly buttressed by the results of two randomized, controlled trials, both of which show improved mortality with early revascularization for cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute infarction.

KEYWORDS

Shock - hemodynamics - thrombolytic therapy - intraaortic balloon counterpulsation - percutaneous coronary intervention

REFERENCES

  • 1 Hochman J S, Boland J, Sleeper L A et al.. Current spectrum of cardiogenic shock and effect of early revascularization on mortality: results of an international registry.  Circulation. 1995;  91 873-881
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Goldberg R J, Gore J M, Alpert J S et al.. Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: incidence and mortality from a community-wide perspective, 1975 to 1988.  N Engl J Med. 1991;  325 1117-1122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Goldberg R J, Samad N A, Yarzebski J, Gurwitz J, Bigelow C, Gore J M. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  340 1162-1168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hollenberg S M, Kavinsky C J, Parrillo J E. Cardiogenic shock.  Ann Intern Med. 1999;  131 47-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Holmes Jr D R, Bates E R, Kleiman N S et al.. Contemporary reperfusion therapy for cardiogenic shock: the GUSTO-I trial experience. The GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;  26 668-674
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bonnefoy E, Lapostolle F, Leizorovicz A et al.. Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study.  Lancet. 2002;  360 825-829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Webb J G, Sleeper L A, Buller C E et al.. Implications of the timing of onset of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shock?.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;  36(3 Suppl A) 1084-1090
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Scheidt S, Ascheim R, Killip T. Shock after acute myocardial infarction: a clinical and hemodynamic profile.  Am J Cardiol. 1970;  26 556-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Killip T, Kimball J T. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit: a two-year experience with 250 patients.  Am J Cardiol. 1967;  20 457-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hands M E, Rutherford J D, Muller J E et al.. The in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: incidence, predictors of occurrence, outcome and prognostic factors. The MILIS Study Group.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;  14 40-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Leor J, Goldbourt U, Reicher-Reiss H, Kaplinsky E, Behar S. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure on admission: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. SPRINT Study Group.  Am J Med. 1993;  94 265-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hasdai D, Califf R M, Thompson T D et al.. Predictors of cardiogenic shock after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;  35 136-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hochman J S, Sleeper L A, Webb J G et al.. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  341 625-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Grines C L, Topol E J, Califf R M et al.. Prognostic implications and predictors of enhanced regional wall motion of the noninfarct zone after thrombolysis and angioplasty therapy of acute myocardial infarction. The TAMI Study Groups.  Circulation. 1989;  80 245-253
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Alonso D R, Scheidt S, Post M, Killip T. Pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock: quantification of myocardial necrosis, clinical, pathologic and electrocardiographic correlations.  Circulation. 1973;  48 588-596
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bolli R. Basic and clinical aspects of myocardial stunning.  Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1998;  40 477-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gerber B L, Wijns W, Vanoverschelde J L et al.. Myocardial perfusion and oxygen consumption in reperfused noninfarcted dysfunctional myocardium after unstable angina: direct evidence for myocardial stunning in humans.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;  34 1939-1946
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wijns W, Vatner S F, Camici P G. Hibernating myocardium.  N Engl J Med. 1998;  339 173-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hollenberg S M. Clinical assessment and initial management of cardiogenic shock. In Hollenberg SM, Bates ER Cardiogenic Shock Armonk, NY; Futura Publishing Company 2002: 45-62
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Nishimura R A, Tajik A J, Shub C, Miller Jr F A, Ilstrup D M, Harrison C E. Role of two-dimensional echocardiography in the prediction of in-hospital complications after acute myocardial infarction.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;  4 1080-1087
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ribeiro A, Lindmarker P, Juhlin-Dannfelt A, Johnsson H, Jorfeldt L. Echocardiography Doppler in pulmonary embolism: right ventricular dysfunction as a predictor of mortality rate.  Am Heart J. 1997;  134 479-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Reilly J P, Tunick P A, Timmermans R J, Stein B, Rosenzweig B P, Kronzon I. Contrast echocardiography clarifies uninterpretable wall motion in intensive care unit patients.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;  35 485-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Califf R M, Bengtson J R. Cardiogenic shock.  N Engl J Med. 1994;  330 1724-1730
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hollenberg S M, Parrillo J E. Shock. In Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Isselbacher KJ, et al. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 14th ed New York; McGraw-Hill 1997: 214-222
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Nedeljkovic Z S, Ryan T J. Right ventricular infarction. In Hollenberg SM, Bates ER Cardiogenic Shock Armonk, NY; Futura Publishing Company 2002: 161-186
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Mimoz O, Rauss A, Rekei N, Brun-Buisson C, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Pulmonary artery catheterization in critically ill patients: a prospective analysis of outcome changes associated with catheter-prompted changes in therapy.  Crit Care Med. 1994;  22 573-579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hollenberg S M, Hoyt J W. Pulmonary artery catheters in cardiovascular disease.  New Horizons. 1997;  5 207-213
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pang D, Keenan S P, Cook D J, Sibbald W J. The effect of positive pressure airway support on mortality and the need for intubation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a systematic review.  Chest. 1998;  114 1185-1192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Forrester J S, Diamond G, Chatterjee K, Swan H JC. Medical therapy of acute myocardial infarction by application of hemodynamic subsets.  N Engl J Med. 1976;  295 1356, 1404-1362, 1413
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Willerson J T, Curry G C, Watson J T et al.. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in patients in cardiogenic shock, medically refractory left ventricular failure and/or recurrent ventricular tachycardia.  Am J Med. 1975;  58 183-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kern M J, Aguirre F, Bach R, Donohue T, Siegel R, Segal J. Augmentation of coronary blood flow by intraaortic balloon pumping in patients after coronary angioplasty.  Circulation. 1993;  87 500-511
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bates E R, Stomel R J, Hochman J S, Ohman E M. The use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation as an adjunct to reperfusion therapy in cardiogenic shock.  Int J Cardiol. 1998;  65(Suppl 1) S37-S42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists’ (FTT) Collaborative Group . Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients.  Lancet. 1994;  343 311-322
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 GUSTO Investigators . An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  329 673-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ryan T J, Antman E M, Brooks N H et al.. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction).  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;  34 890-911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 AIMS Trial Study Group . Effect of intravenous APSAC on mortality after acute myocardial infarction: preliminary report of a placebo-controlled clinical trial.  Lancet. 1988;  1 545-549
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Col N F, Gurwitz J H, Alpert J S, Goldberg R J. Frequency of inclusion of patients with cardiogenic shock in trials of thrombolytic therapy.  Am J Cardiol. 1994;  73 149-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio Della Streptochinasi Nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) . Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction.  Lancet. 1986;  2 397-402
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 ISIS-2 Collaborative Group . Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2.  Lancet. 1988;  2 349-360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Sanborn T A, Sleeper L A, Bates E R et al.. Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Should we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shock?.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;  36(3 Suppl A) 1123-1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Becker R C. Hemodynamic, mechanical, and metabolic determinants of thrombolytic efficacy: a theoretic framework for assessing the limitations of thrombolysis in patients with cardiogenic shock.  Am Heart J. 1993;  125 919-929
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Garber P J, Mathieson A L, Ducas J, Patton J N, Geddes J S, Prewitt R M. Thrombolytic therapy in cardiogenic shock: effect of increased aortic pressure and rapid tPA administration.  Can J Cardiol. 1995;  11 30-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 O’Keefe Jr J H, Bailey W L, Rutherford B D, Hartzler G O. Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in 1000 consecutive patients: results in an unselected population and high-risk subgroups.  Am J Cardiol. 1993;  72 107G-115G
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Berger P B, Holmes Jr D R, Stebbins A L, Bates E R, Califf R M, Topol E J. Impact of an aggressive invasive catheterization and revascularization strategy on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial. An observational study.  Circulation. 1997;  96 122-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Berger P B, Tuttle R H, Holmes Jr D R et al.. One-year survival among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, and its relation to early revascularization: results from the GUSTO-I trial.  Circulation. 1999;  99 873-878
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Rogers W J, Canto J G, Lambrew C T et al.. Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;  36 2056-2063
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Hochman J S, Sleeper L A, White H D et al.. One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock.  JAMA. 2001;  285 190-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Urban P, Stauffer J C, Bleed D et al.. A randomized evaluation of early revascularization to treat shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. The (Swiss) Multicenter Trial of Angioplasty for Shock-(S)MASH.  Eur Heart J. 1999;  20 1030-1038
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Urban P, Stauffer J -C. Randomized trials of revascularization therapy for cardiogenic shock. In Hollenberg SM, Bates ER Cardiogenic Shock Armonk, NY; Futura Publishing Company 2002: 135-144
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Stone G W, Brodie B R, Griffin J J et al.. Prospective, multicenter study of the safety and feasibility of primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: in-hospital and 30-day results of the PAMI stent pilot trial. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Stent Pilot Trial Investigators.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;  31 23-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Schomig A, Neumann F J, Walter H et al.. Coronary stent placement in patients with acute myocardial infarction: comparison of clinical and angiographic outcome after randomization to antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;  29 28-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Stone G W, Brodie B R, Griffin J J et al.. Clinical and angiographic follow-up after primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) stent pilot trial.  Circulation. 1999;  99 1548-1554
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Santoro G M et al.. Systematic direct angioplasty and stent-supported direct angioplasty therapy for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: in-hospital and long-term survival.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;  31 294-300
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Webb J G, Carere R G, Hilton J D et al.. Usefulness of coronary stenting for cardiogenic shock.  Am J Cardiol. 1997;  79 81-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O et al.. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  344 1895-1903
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Diaz R, Paolasso E A, Piegas L S et al.. Metabolic modulation of acute myocardial infarction.  Circulation. 1998;  98 2227-2234
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Barron H V, Every N R, Parsons L S et al.. Use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.  Am Heart J. 2001;  141 933-939
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Kovack P J, Rasak M A, Bates E R, Ohman E M, Stomel R J. Thrombolysis plus aortic counterpulsation: improved survival in patients who present to community hospitals with cardiogenic shock.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;  29 1454-1458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Stomel R J, Rasak M , Bates E R. Treatment strategies for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in a community hospital.  Chest. 1994;  105 997-1002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Steven M HollenbergM.D. 

Section of Cardiology, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, One Cooper Plaza

366 Dorrance, Camden, NJ 08103

eMail: Hollenberg-Steven@cooperhealth.edu