The role of endoscopy, in particular colonoscopy, clearly is paramount in the screening, diagnosis, and prevention of colorectal cancer. In preparation for writing this ”state-of-the-art” review on colon polyps and cancer, a PubMed literature search linking the topic with endoscopy yielded an enormous number of papers published in peer-reviewed journals just in the past 12 months. I have selected a few of these to highlight that I believe are most germane to current issues of risk stratification, screening and surveillance, prevention, and the premalignant potential of different types of adenomas detected by endoscopy. Several of these papers address the advantages and limitations of direct colonoscopy screening for colorectal neoplasia, and discuss the emerging role of virtual colonoscopy screening.
References
1
Harewood G C, Lieberman D A.
Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of Medicare coverage for average-risk screening.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2004;
2
72-77
2
Mysliwiec P A, Brown M L, Dlabunde C N, Ransohoff D F.
Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy.
Ann Intern Med.
2004;
141
264-271
3
Rex O K, Cutler C S, Lemmel G T. et al .
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
112
24-28
4
Hixson L J, Fennerty M B, Sampliner R E. et al .
Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1991;
37
125-127
6
Rex D K, Rahmani E Y, Haseman J H. et al .
Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
112
17-23
7
Bressler B, Paszat L F, Vinden C. et al .
Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis.
Gastroenterology.
2004;
127
452-456
9
Bretthauer M, Skovlund E, Grotmol T.
Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
2003;
38
1268-1274
10
Sanchez W, Harewood G C, Petersen B T.
Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2004;
99
1941-1945
11
Ball J E, Osbourne J, Jowett . et al .
Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study.
Br Med J.
2004;
329
665-667
12
Rex D K, Bond J H, Winawer S. et al .
Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2002;
97
1296-1308
13
Fenlon H M, Nunes D P, Schroy P C. et al .
A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.
N Engl J Med.
1999;
341
1496-1503
14
Yee J, Akerkar G A, Hung R K. et al .
Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients.
Radiology.
2001;
219
685-692
15
Pineau B C, Paskett E D, Chen G J. et al .
Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps.
Gastroenterology.
2003;
125
304-310
16
Johnson C D, Harmen W S, Wilson L A. et al .
Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen-detection of colorectal polyps.
Gastroenterology.
2003;
125
311-319
18
Pickhardt P J, Choi J R, Hwang I. et al .
Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.
N Engl J Med.
2003;
349
2191-2200
19
Nelson D B, McQuaid K R, Bond J H. et al .
Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
55
307-314
20
Lieberman D A, Weiss D G, VA C ooperative.
One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult blood testing and examination of the distal colon.
N Engl J Med.
2001;
345
555-560
22
Lieberman D A, Prindiville S, Weiss D G. et al .
Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia and hyperplastic polyps in asymptomatic individuals.
JAMA.
2003;
290
2959-2967
23
Sandler R S, Halabi S, Baron J A. et al .
A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas in patients with previous colorectal cancer.
N Engl J Med.
2003;
348
883-890
25
Burt R W, Leppert M F, Slattery M L. et al .
Genetic testing and phenotype in a large kindred with attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis.
Gastroenterology.
2004;
127
444-451
26
Winawer S J, Zauber A G, Gerdes H. et al .
and the National Polyp Study Workgroup. Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps.
N Engl J Med.
1996;
334
82-87
27
Lynch K L, Ahnen D J, Byers T. et al .
First-degree relatives of patients with advanced colorectal adenomas have increased prevalence of colorectal cancer.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2003;
1
96-102
28
Muto T, Kamiya J, Sawada T. et al .
Small flat adenoma of the large bowel with special reference to its clinicopathologic features.
Dis Colon Rectum.
1985;
28
847-851
29
O’Brien M J, Winawer S J, Zauber A G. et al .
Flat adenomas in the National Polyp Study: is there increased risk for high-grade dysplasia initially or during surveillance?.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2004;
2
905-911
30
Diebold M D, Samalin E, Merle C. et al .
Colonic flat neoplasia: frequency and concordance between endoscopic appearance and histological diagnosis in a French prospective series.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2004;
99
1795-1800
31
Pinsky P F, Schoen R E, Weissfeld J L. et al .
Predictors of advanced proximal neoplasia in persons with abnormal screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2003;
1
103-110
