Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2003; 21(4): 375-388
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815593
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Müllerian Anomalies

Jennifer S. Gell
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Geisinger Medical Group, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 January 2004 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The reproductive organs in both males and females consist of gonads, internal ductal structures, and external genitalia. Normal sexual differentiation is dependent on the genetic sex determined by the presence or absence of the Y chromosome at fertilization. Testes develop under the influence of the Y chromosome and ovaries develop when no Y chromosome is present. In the absence of testes and their normal hormonal products, sexual differentiation proceeds along the female pathway, resulting in a normal female phenotype. Anatomic gynecologic anomalies occur when there is failure of normal embryologic ductal development. These anomalies include congenital absence of the vagina as well as defects in lateral and vertical fusion of the Müllerian ducts. Treatment of müllerian anomalies begins with the correct identification of the anomaly and an understanding of the embryologic origin. This includes evaluation for other associated anomalies such as renal or skeletal abnormalities. After correct identification, treatment options include nonsurgical as well as surgical intervention. This chapter serves to review the embryology and development of the reproductive system and to describe common genital tract anomalies. Details of surgical or nonsurgical correction of these anomalies are presented.

KEYWORDS

Müllerian - müllerian agenesis - vaginal septum - uterine septum

REFERENCES

  • 1 Larsen W J. Human Embryology.  New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Langman J. Medical Embryology.  Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1975
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Lee M M, Donahoe P K. Mullerian inhibiting substance: a gonadal hormone with multiple functions.  Endocr Rev . 1993;  14 152-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gustafson M L, Lee M M, Asmundson L, MacLaughlin D T, Donahoe P K. Mullerian inhibiting substance in the diagnosis and management of intersex and gonadal abnormalities.  J Pediatr Surg . 1993;  28 439-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Edman C D, Winters A J, Porter J C, Wilson J, MacDonald P C. Embryonic testicular regression: a clinical spectrum of XY agonadal individuals.  Obstet Gynecol . 1977;  49 208-217
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wilson J D, George F W, Griffin J E. The hormonal control of sexual development.  Science . 1981;  211 1278-1284
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Haqq C M, King C-Y, Ukiyama E. Molecular basis of mammalian sexual determination: activation of mullerian inhibiting substance gene expression by SRY.  Science . 1994;  266 1494-1500
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Swain A, Narvaez V, Burgoyne P, Camerino G, Lovell-Badge R. Dax1 antagonizes Sry action in mammalian sex determination.  Nature . 1998;  391 761-767
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Parker K L, Schimmer B P. Steroidogenic factor 1: a key determinant of endocrine development and function.  Endocr Rev . 1997;  18 361-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sadovsky Y, Crawford P A. Developmental and physiologic roles of the nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor-1 in the reproductive system.  J Soc Gynecol Investig . 1998;  5 6-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Achermann J C, Ito M, Hindmarsh P C, Jameson J L. A mutation in the gene encoding steroidogenic factor-1 SY sex reversal and adrenal failure in humans.  Nat Genet . 1999;  22 125-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Biason-Lauber A, Schoenle E J. Apparently normal ovarian differentiation in a prepubertal girl with transcriptionally inactive steroidogenic factor 1 (NR5A1/SF1) and adrenocortical insufficiency.  Am J Hum Genet . 2000;  67 1563-1568
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Parker K L, Schimmer B P. Genes essential for early events in gonadal development.  Ann Med . 2002;  34 171-178
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zanaria E, Muscatelli F, Bardoni B. An unusual member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily responsible for X-linked adrenal hypoplasia congenita.  Nature . 1994;  372 635-641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ikeda Y, Swain A, Weber T J. Steroidogenic factor 1 and Dax-1 colocalize in multiple cell lineages: potential links in endocrine development.  Mol Endocrinol . 1996;  10 1261-1272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Buttram Jr C V, Gibbons W E. Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases).  Fertil Steril . 1979;  32 40-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rock J A. Anomalous development of the vagina.  Semin Reprod Endocrinol . 1986;  4 13-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Evans T N, Poland M L, Boving R L. Vaginal malformations.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1981;  141 910-920
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Thompson J D, Rock J A, eds. Te Linde's Operative Gynecology, 7th e d. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1992.  
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Lindenman E, Shepard M K, Pescovitz O H. Mullerian agenesis: an update.  Obstet Gynecol . 1997;  90 307-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Reinhold C, Hricak H, Forstner R. Primary amenorrhea: evaluation with MR imaging.  Radiology . 1997;  203 383-390
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K. Vaginal agenesis: classification by MR imaging.  Radiology . 1987;  162 675-677
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Economy K E, Barnewolt C, Lauger M R. A comparison of MRI and laparoscopy in detecting pelvic structures in cases of vaginal agenesis.  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol . 2002;  15 101-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Taylor H S, Vanden Heuvel B G, Igarashi P. A conserved Hox axis in the mouse and human female reproductive system; late establishment and persistent adult expression of the Hoxa cluster genes.  Biol Reprod . 1997;  57 1338-1345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Taylor H S. The role of HOX genes in the development and function of the female reproductive tract.  Semin Reprod Med . 2000;  18 81-88
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Warot X, Fromental-Ramain C, Fraulob V, Chambon P, Dolle P. Gene dosage-dependent effects of the hoxa-13 and hoxd-13 mutations on morphogenesis of the terminal parts of the digestive and urogenital tracts.  Development . 1997;  124 4781-4791
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Stelling J R, Bhagavath B, Gray M R, Reindollar R H. Hoxa13 homeodomain mutation analysis in patients with mullerian system anomalies. Abstract, Society Gynecologic Investigation, Atlanta GA, 1997: 140A.
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Taylor H S, Block K, Kardana A, Igarashi P. In utero DES exposure alters HOX gene expression in the developing mouse mullerian system. Abstract, Society Gynecologic Investigation, Atlanta GA, 1997: 39A.
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Frank R T. The formation of an artificial vagina without operation.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1938;  35 1053-1055
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wabrek A J, Millard R, Wilson W B, Pion R J. Creation of a neovagina by the Frank nonoperative method.  Obstet Gynecol . 1971;  37 408-413
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ingram J M. The bicycle seat stool in the treatment of vaginal agenesis and stenosis: a preliminary report.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1981;  140 867-873
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 McIndoe A. The treatment of congenital absence and obliterative conditions of the vagina.  Br J Plast Surg . 1950;  2 234-267
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wheeless C R, Parker J. Atlas of Pelvic Surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Rock J A, Murphy A A, Jones Jr W H. Female Reproductive Surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Alessandrescu D, Peltecu G C, Buhimschi C S, Buhimschi I A. Neocolpopoiesis with split-thickness skin graft as a surgical treatment of vaginal agenesis: retrospective review of 201 cases.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1996;  175 131-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Rock J A, Reeves L A, Retto H, Baramki T A, Zacur H A, Jones Jr A H. Success following vaginal creation for Mullerian agenesis.  Fertil Steril . 1983;  39 809-813
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Roberts C P, Haber M J, Rock J A. Vaginal creation for mullerian agenesis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2001;  185 1349-1353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Jackson N D, Rosenblatt P L. Use of interceed absorbable adhesion barrier for vaginoplasty.  Obstet Gynecol . 1994;  84 1048-1050
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Parsons J K, Gearhart S L, Gearhart J P. Vaginal reconstruction utilizing sigmoid colon: complications and long-term results.  J Pediatr Surg . 2002;  37 629-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Veronikis D K, McClure G B, Nichols D H. The Vecchietti operation for constructing a neovagina: indications, instrumentation and techniques.  Obstet Gynecol . 1997;  90 301-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Gauwerky J FH, Wallwiener D, Bastert G. An endoscopically assisted technique for construction of a neovagina.  Arch Gynecol Obstet . 1992;  252 59-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Demario M A. Transabdominal-transperitoneal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval in a patient with mullerian agenesis.  Fertil Steril . 2002;  78 189-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Wenof M, Reynick J V, Novendstern J, Castadot M J. Transverse vaginal septum.  Obstet Gynecol . 1979;  54 60-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Rock J A, Zacur H A, Dlugi A M, Jones Jr W H. Pregnancy success following surgical correction of imperforate hymen and complete transverse vaginal septum.  Obstet Gynecol . 1982;  59 448-451
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Rock J A, Jones Jr W H. Vaginal forms for dilatation and/or to maintain vaginal patency.  Fertil Steril . 1984;  42 187-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Markham S M, Parley T H, Murphy A A, Huggins G R, Rock J A. Cervical agenesis combined with vaginal agenesis diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging.  Fertil Steril . 1987;  48 143-145
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Rock J A, Schlaff W D, Zacur H A, Jones Jr W H. The clinical management of congenital absence of the uterine cervix.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet . 1984;  22 231-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Fujimoto V Y, Miller J H, Klein N A, Soules M R. Congenital cervical atresia: report of seven cases and review of the literature.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1997;  177 1419-1425
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Deffarges J V, Haddad B, Musset R, Paniel B J. Utero-vaginal anastomosis in women with uterine cervix atresia; long-term follow-up and reproductive performance. A study of 18 cases.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 1722-1725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Rock J A, Jones Jr W H. The double uterus associated with an obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1980;  138 339-342
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Daly D C, Walters C A, Soto-Albors C E, Riddick D H. Hysteroscopic metroplasty: surgical technique and obstetrical outcome.  Fertil Steril . 1983;  39 623-628
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Israel R, March G M. Hysteroscopic incision of the septate uterus.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1984;  149 66-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Fedele L, Arcaini L, Parazzini F, Vercellini P, Di Nola G. Reproductive prognosis after hysteroscopic metroplasty in 102 women: life-table analysis.  Fertil Steril . 1993;  59 768-772
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Goldenberg M, Sivan E, Sharabi Z, Mashiach S, Lipitz S, Seidman D S. following hysteroscopic management of intrauterine septum and adhesions.  Hum Reprod . 1995;  10 2663-2665
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Cararach M, Penella J, Ubeda A, Labastida R. Hysteroscopic incision of the septate uterus: scissors versus resectoscope.  Hum Reprod . 1994;  9 87-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Baggish M S, Barbot J, Valle R F. Diagnostic and Operative Hysteroscopy: A Text and Atlas. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers 1993
    Google Scholar
      >