Eur J Pediatr Surg 2003; 13: 18-22
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-44752
Original Article

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttart, New York · Masson Editeur Paris

A Study of Prenatal Ultrasound and Postnatal Magnetic Imaging in the Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Abnormalities

T. R. Patel 1 , C. M. Bannister 1 , J. Thorne 1
  • 1Fetal Management Unit, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: July 29, 2003

Publikationsdatum:
03. Februar 2004 (online)

Abstract

Accurate prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities is essential in counselling parents, as they are the most common developmental abnormalities causing considerable mortality. Currently, the standard in prenatal imaging is ultrasound scanning (USS). The introduction of fast acquisition magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has lead to increased diagnostic confidence and information available for parents.

Frequently USS initially identifies CNS abnormalities as ventriculomegaly alone. However, it is known that ventriculomegaly is commonly associated with other CNS pathology, which may adversely affect the prognosis. As MRI has superior soft tissue resolution and can be used at any time postnatally, it is expected to identify disorders of myelination that may result from prenatal ventriculomegaly.

This study will evaluate the role of MRI as a postnatal imaging tool in patients that had a prenatal USS diagnosis of isolated ventriculomegaly.

This was a retrospective review of patient notes and scan reports. The postnatal MRI study group consisted of 9 patients that had been diagnosed initially with prenatal isolated ventriculomegaly on USS, and followed up with postnatal MRI (cases of spina bifida and Dandy-Walker malformations were excluded). Findings from the scan reports were recorded and analysed.

Both MRI and prenatal USS gave the same information in 55.6 % of the patients. In the remaining 44.4 %, MRI added to the information provided by the prenatal USS. An interesting finding was that MRI missed a small fluid-filled cyst and an arachnoid cyst in 2 cases.

55.6 % of patients went on to develop other CNS abnormalities prenatally, whereas 33.3 % showed prenatal regression of VM with no other pathology. 11.1 % showed postnatal persistence of isolated VM.

As USS has the advantage of being cheap and easy to perform, it will remain as the primary imaging tool in obstetric care. MRI can provide significant additional information that can affect parent counselling, prenatal intervention, and postnatal management. Postnatally, MRI can give some idea of prognosis by evaluating myelination patterns, which is not possible with USS.

References

  • 1 Arora A, Bannister C M, Russell S, Rimmer S. Outcome and clinical course of prenatally diagnosed cerebral ventriculomegaly.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1998;  8 (Suppl I) 63-64
  • 2 Craig B, McArdle M D. et al . Developmental features of the neonatal brain: MR imaging.  Radiology. 1987;  162 230-234
  • 3 Graham E, Duhl A. et al . The degree of antenatal ventriculomegaly is related to paediatric neurological morbidity.  J Maternal Fetal Medicine. 2001;  10 258-263
  • 4 Holland B A, Haas D K. et al . MRI of normal brain maturation.  Am J Neuroradiol. 1986;  2 201-208
  • 5 Levine D, Barnes P D. et al . Fetal central nervous system anomalies: MR imaging augments sonographic diagnosis.  Radiology. 1997;  204 635-642
  • 6 Martin E. et al . MR imaging of brain maturation in normal and developmentally handicapped children.  Computer Assisted Tomography. 1990;  5 685-692
  • 7 Simon E, Goldstein R. et al . Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero.  Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;  21 1688-1698
  • 8 Twining P. et al . The outcome of fetal ventriculomegaly.  Br J Radiol. 1994;  67 26-31
  • 9 Vergani P, Locatelli A. et al . Clinical outcome of mild fetal ventriculomegaly.  Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;  178 218-222
  • 10 Whitby E, Paley M, Davies N, Sprigg A, Griffiths P. Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of central nervous system abnormalities in utero in the second and third trimester of pregnancy: comparison with ultrasound.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;  108 519-526

OBE Carys M. Bannister

Fetal Management Unit
St. Mary's Hospital

Hathersage Road

Manchester M13 0JH

United Kingdom

eMail: carysban@AOL.com