Facial Plast Surg 2003; 19(3): 279-294
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-43163
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Rhinoplasty for the Mediterranean Nose

Pietro Palma, Maurizio Bignami, Giovanni Delù, Francesca De Bernardi, Paolo Castelnuovo
  • ENT Department, University of Insubria-Ospedale di Circolo/Fondazione "Macchi," Varese, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 October 2003 (online)

ABSTRACT

Homogenization of world culture through communications media, refinements in surgical techniques, and improved rhinoplasty results have resulted in a more extended dissemination of rhinoplasty among non-Caucasians. This request has led to increasingly anatomic, morphologic, and anthropometrical studies of the non-Caucasian nose upon which surgical techniques have been proposed and addressed to create in these patients nasal features typical of a Caucasian-looking nose. There are few reports in medical literature concerning rhinoplasty that specifically address particular Caucasian ethnic groups (Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Latin, and Slavic). Generally included within the Latin group are subjects presenting both paradigmatic nasal morphologies (typically, the classic "Greek," "Roman," and "French" noses) and important cultural differences that greatly influence the subjective perception of the defect and, therefore, the type of change requested.

These challenging conditions require a highly "customized" approach, both in the phase of the preoperative planning and in the choice of surgical options. The authors, by means of a photographic analysis systematically used with all their rhinoplasty patients, have identified some archetypes of nasal pyramid configurations that are typical of the reference population (44% Northern Italy, 15% Central Italy, 41% Southern Italy) and, on the basis of a medium/long-term evaluation of the relationship between adopted surgical techniques and results, propose some surgical options that are specific for every nasal archetype.

This categorization helps the surgeon carry out a structured preoperative aesthetical analysis and provides him/her with both an anticipation of what findings to expect and the ability to deal with already diagnosed problems. Every archetype shows strong similarities in terms of preoperative analysis, surgical solutions, and subjective perception of the success of the surgery. The surgical options used proved to be apt to modify some paradigmatic defects in a satisfactorily predictable way.

Combining the different tesserae of this puzzle to reach the goal of a satisfied patient (and not necessarily a beautiful nose) makes rhinoplasty a true challenge that requires a special talent from the surgeon: combining analysis capabilities, surgical logic, and manual skills with artistic sensitivity.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Ofodile F A, Bokhari F J, Ellis C. The Black American nose.  Ann Plast Surg . 1993;  31 209
  • 2 Ofodile F A. Nasal bones and pyriform apertures in Blacks.  Ann Plast Surg . 1994;  32 21
  • 3 Ofodile F A, Errol J. Anatomy of alar cartilages in blacks.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1997;  100 699
  • 4 Wu W TL. The Oriental nose: an anatomical basis for surgery.  Ann Acad Med Singapore . 1979;  21
  • 5 Sim R ST, Smith J D, Chang A SY. Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of Southern Chinese and White women.  Arch Facial Plast Surg . 2000;  2 113
  • 6 Snyder G B. Rhinoplasty in the Negro.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1971;  47 572
  • 7 Ortiz-Monasterio F, Olmedo A. Rhinoplasty on the mestizo nose.  Clin Plast Surg . 1977;  4 89
  • 8 Beheri G E. Rhinoplasty in Egyptians.  Aesth Plast Surg . 1984;  3 143
  • 9 Rohrich R J. Pragmatic approach to black rhinoplasty: pitfalls and technical refinements. PSEF Course, September 1994
  • 10 Furukawa M. Oriental rhinoplasty.  Clin Plast Surg . 1974;  1 129
  • 11 McCurdy Jr A J. The Asian nose: augmentation rhinoplasty with L-shaped silicone implants.  Facial Plastic Surgery . 2002;  18 245
  • 12 Falces E, Messer D, Gorney M. Cosmetic surgery of the non-Caucasian nose.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1970;  45 317
  • 13 Eibl-Eibesfeldt I. Die Biologie menschlichen Verhaltens.  Muenchen: Piper 1986: 830
  • 14 Farkas L G. Anthropometry of the Head and Face in Medicine.  New York: Elsevier; 1981
  • 15 Ali-Salaam P, Kashgarian M, Davila J, Persing J. Anatomy of the Caucasian alar groove.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2002;  110 261
  • 16 Ausin A, Ausin R. Muscles of the nose. In: Plastic Surgery Vol. 1. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series New York: Elsevier Science 1992: 37
  • 17 Daniel R K. The nasal tip: anatomy and aesthetics.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1992;  89 216
  • 18 Daniel R K, Letourneau A. Rhinoplasty: nasal anatomy.  Ann Plast Surg . 1988;  20 5
  • 19 Natvig P, Sether L A, Gingrass R P, Gardner W D. Anatomical details of the osseous-cartilaginous framework of the nose.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1971;  48 258
  • 20 Tardy Jr E M, Brown R J. Surgical anatomy of the nose.  New York: Raven Press; 1990
  • 21 Zelnik J, Gingrass R P. Anatomy of the alar cartilages.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1979;  64 650
  • 22 Farkas L G. Anthropometry of the head and face.  New York: Raven Press; 1994
  • 23 Farkas L G, Kolar J C, Munro I R. Geography of the nose: a morphometric study.  Aesth Plast Surg . 1986;  10 191
  • 24 Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the aesthetic face.  New York: Thieme-Stratton Inc; 1984
  • 25 Byrd H S, Hobar P C. Rhinoplasty: a practical guide for surgical planning.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993;  91 642
  • 26 Crumley R M, Lanser M. Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection.  Laryngoscope . 1988;  98 202
  • 27 Daniel R K. Rhinoplasty.  Boston, Toronto, London: Little, Brown and Company; 1993
  • 28 Gunther J P. Facial analysis for the rhinoplasty patient. Syllabus 1995 12th annual Dallas Rhinoplasty Symposium; 1995: 17
  • 29 Sulsenti G. Chirurgia Funzionale ed Estetica del Naso.  Milano: Ghedini editore; 1994
  • 30 Farkas L G, Hreczko T A, Deutsch C. Objective assessment of standard nostril types.  Ann Plast Surg . 1983;  11 381-389
  • 31 Sheen J H, Sheen A P. Aesthetic rhinoplasty.  2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby 1987: 808-825
  • 32 Bernstein L. Esthetics in rhinoplasty.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am . 1975;  8 705
  • 33 Converse J M. Corrective rhinoplasty. In: Converse JM, ed. Reconstructive Surgery 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1977: 1040-1063
  • 34 Kelso A J. Physical anthropology: an introduction.  Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1970
  • 35 Sulsenti G, Palma P. Complications and sequelae of nasal base and tip surgery.  Facial Plastic Surgery . 1997;  13 25
  • 36 da Vinci L. Trattario della pittura, Bologna, 1786. In: Boyd E, ed. Origins of the Study of the Human Growth Portland: University of Oregon Health Sciences Foundation 1980: 67
  • 37 Dürer A. Les quatres livres d'Albert Dürer, peintre et geométrien très excellent, de la proportion des parties pourtraicts des corps humains.  Paris: C. Perier; 1557
  • 38 Farkas L G, Hreczko T A, Kolar J C, Munro I R. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revisions of neoclassical canons.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1985;  75 328-337
  • 39 Muzj E. Biometric correlations among organs of the facial profile. A possible solution to the present crisis in orthodontics.  Am J Orthod . 1956;  42 827
  • 40 Reich J. Aesthetic judgment in the surgery appearance.  Aesth Plast Surg . 1976;  1 35
    >