Facial Plast Surg 2003; 19(2): 199-208
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40005
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

The Extended Centrolateral Endoscopic Midface Lift

Vito C. Quatela1 , Andrew A. Jacono2
  • 1The Lindsay House Center for Cosmetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rochester, NY
  • 2The New York Center for Facial Plastic and Laser Surgery, Great Neck, NY
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 June 2003 (online)

ABSTRACT

Most of the advances in face lift techniques in the past decade have been directed at altering the aging changes of the midface. Our technique for endoscopic midface lifting releases the entire central and lateral midface, which allows for a complete resuspension and rejuvenation. This technique utilizes a subperiosteal release of the midface from the infraorbital rim to the inferior aspect of the maxilla and laterally over the entire zygomatic arch to the gonial angle beneath the masseteric aponeurosis. Suspension is achieved superolaterally to the deep temporal fascia and repositions the malar fat pad, SOOF, and soft tissues overlying the angle of the mandible. Over 400 procedures have been performed. We found the degree of improvement in the following order, from greatest to least: (1) correction of midface ptosis and infraorbital hollowing, (2) improvement of the depth of the nasolabial fold, and (3) improvement of the degree of jowling. This technique is one of low morbidity and few complications.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Larson D L. An historical glimpse of the evolution of rhytidectomy.  Clin Plast Surg . 1995;  22 207
  • 2 Hamra S T. The deep-plane rhytidectomy.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1990;  86 53
  • 3 Dempsey P D, Oneal R M, Izenberg P H. Sub-periosteal brow and midface lifts.  Aesthet Plast Surg . 1995;  19 59
  • 4 Fuente del Campo A. Centrofacial lifting.  Perspect Plast Surg . 1993;  7 87
  • 5 Hester T R, Codner M A, McCord D D. The “centrofacial” approach for correction of facial aging using the transblepharoplasty subperiosteal cheek lift.  Aesthet Surg J . 1996;  16 51
  • 6 Sclafani A P. The multivectorial subperiosteal midface lift.  Facial Plast Surg . 2001;  17 29
  • 7 Ramirez O M. Three-dimensional endoscopic midface enhancement: a personal quest for the ideal cheek rejuvenation.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2002;  109 329
  • 8 Anderson R D, Lo M W. Endoscopic malar/midface suspension procedure.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1998;  102 2196
  • 9 Keller G, Ed. Endoscopic Facial Plastic Surgery. St. Louis, MO: Mosby 1997
  • 10 Stuzin J M, Wagstrom L, Kawamoto H K. et al . Anatomy of the frontal branch of the facial nerve: the significance of the temporal fat pad.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1989;  83 265
  • 11 Gosain A K, Sewall S R, Yousif N J. The temporal branch of the facial nerve: how reliably can we predict its path?.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1997;  99 1224
  • 12 Quatela V C, Slupchynskyj O, Villano M. Evaluation of forehead fixation time after endoscopic forehead lift with midfacial suspension.  (in press).
  • 13 Trinei F A, Januskiewicz J, Nahai F. The sentinel vein: an important reference point for surgery in the temporal region.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1998;  101 27
  • 14 Sabini P, Wayne I, Quatela V. Anatomic guides to precisely localize the frontal branch of the facial nerve.  Arch Facial Plast Surg . 2003;  5 150-152
  • 15 Hurwitz D J, Raskin E M. Reducing eyelid retraction following subperiosteal facelift.  Aesthet Surg J . 1997;  17 149
  • 16 Quatela V, Leake D, Villano M, Jacono A, Sabini P. Assessment of lower lid laxity following midface lift. 8th International Symposium of Facial Plastic Surgery, New York, NY, May 2002
    >