Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003; 46(2): 94-99
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-39341
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Thecaloscopy Part III: First Clinical Application

J.  P.  Warnke1 , H.  Köppert1 , B.  Bensch-Schreiter1 , J.  Dzelzitis3 , M.  Tschabitscher2
  • 1Neurosurgical Department, Paracelsus Klinik, Zwickau, Germany
  • 2Study Group for Endoscopic and Microsurgical Anatomy, Vienna, Austria
  • 3Neurosurgical Department, 7. Hospital, Riga, Latvia
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 May 2003 (online)

Abstract

Purpose: We have already dealt with the technical [1] and anatomical [2] basics for thecaloscopy. The first results of clinical application are presented and the indications for its diagnostic and therapeutic use are described. The aetiology of aseptic arachnitis and the term “Wide spinal canal syndrome” are discussed.

Patients and Methods: Twelve patients who fulfilled the criteria for entry to the study were selected and the criteria were chosen according to German medical and legal rules. All patients underwent an endoscopic inspection and, if necessary, therapeutic manipulation under general anaesthesia.

Results: In all cases the procedure was safely and successfully performed. The pathomorphology of the arachnoid was detected and endoscopically treated in almost all cases. Arachnoid cysts were successfully fenestrated and an intraspinal meningocoele treated with endoscopic assistance.

Conclusion: Thecaloscopy is a safe procedure if skilfully performed. It provides an opening for a wide range of new diagnostic and therapeutic options.

References

  • 1 Warnke J P, Tschabitscher M, Nobles A. Thecaloscopy: The endoscopy of the lumbar subarachnoid space, Part I: Historical review and own cadaver studies.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2001;  42 61-64
  • 2 Warnke J P, Mourgela S, Tschabitscher M, Dzelzitis J. Thecaloscopy Part II: Anatomical landmarks.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2001;  44 181-185
  • 3 Hoffmann G S. Spinal arachnoiditis: what's the clinical spectrum? Part I.  Spine. 1983;  8 538-540
  • 4 Huewel N M, Pernetzky A, Urban V, Fries G. Neuroendoscopic technique for the operative treatment of septated syringomyelia.  Acta Neurochir. 1992;  Suppl 54 59-62
  • 5 Epstein J A. Obliterative arachnoiditis. A complication of spinal stenosis.  Spine. 1978;  3 7-11
  • 6 Epstein J A, Epstein B S, Lavine L S, Rosenthal A D, Decker R E, Carras R. Obliterative arachnoiditis complicating lumbarspinal stenosis.  J Neurosurg. 1978;  48 252-258
  • 7 Kawauchi Y, Yone K, Sakou T. Myeloscopic observation of adhesive arachnoiditis in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.  Spinal cord. 1996;  34 403-410
  • 8 Peek R D, Thomas J C, Wiltse L L. Diagnosis of lumbar arachnoiditis by myeloscope.  Spine. 1993;  18 2286-2289
  • 9 Shimoij K, Fujioka H, Onodera M, Hokari T, Fukuda S, Fujiwara N, Hatori T. Observation of spinal canal and cisternae with newly developed small-diameter, flexible fiberscope.  Anaesthesiology. 1991;  75 341-344
  • 10 Beuls E A, van Mameren H, Vroomen P C. Caudascopic experiences and a new pathoanatomic concept for treatment of sciatica.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1996;  39 4-6
  • 11 Mooj J J. Spinal arachnoiditis: disease or coincidence?.  Acta Neurochir. 1980;  53 151-160
  • 12 Hoffmann G S, Ellsworth C A, Wells E E, Franck W A, Mackie R W. Spinal arachnoiditis: what's the clinical spectrum? Part II.  Spine. 1983;  8 541-551

J. P. Warnke, M. D. 

Department of Neurosurgery · Paracelsus Klinik

Werdauer Str. 68

08008 Zwickau

Germany

Email: warnkeJ@gmx.de