RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35845
Is Barrett's Esophagus Dangerous?
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
02. Dezember 2002 (online)
A campaign of ablation against Barrett's esophagus has been initiated at a number of centers. This campaign is not confined just to “rogue Barrett's” - where tissue has gone awry, with the development of dysplasia or very early cancer. It has also been directed at ordinary, everyday Barrett's esophagus [1] [2].
In this issue of Endoscopy, Kahaleh and colleagues [3] report long-term results (median 36 months) with ablation of Barrett's esophagus using argon plasma coagulation (APC) in 39 patients. Thirty-two of the 39 had no dysplasia, and the remaining seven had low-grade dysplasia. The results presented by the authors, and their analytical discussion of them, show that ablation treatment for Barrett's esophagus is at a relatively early stage of technical assessment with regard to both feasibility and durability.
Barrett's esophagus is a remarkable biological phenomenon. When the gut becomes stressed, it wants to be something else (Henry Appelman, personal communication). This something else is metaplasia - a response to injury throughout the gastrointestinal tract in which one type of adult tissue replaces another. What is amazing is that when Barrett's metaplasia is, in turn, injured by a variety of treatment modalities, then it too wants to be something else. In this case, the something else is to disappear and be replaced by the original squamous lining epithelium.
The metaplasia of Barrett's esophagus would be simply a curiosity if it were not for the fact that it carries a slight increase in cancer risk, as does intestinal metaplasia in the stomach. Other types of metaplasia - e. g., gastric metaplasia of the duodenal bulb surrounding duodenal ulcers, and pseudopyloric (mucous gland) metaplasia in Crohn’s disease - do not carry an increased risk of cancer.
References
- 1 Weinstein W M. The prevention and treatment of dysplasia in gastroesophageal reflux disease: the results and the challenges ahead. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002; 17 (Suppl.) S113-S124
- 2 Walker S J, Selvasekar C R, Birbeck N. Mucosal ablation in Barrett's esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2002; 15 22-29
- 3 Kahaleh M, Van Laethem J L, Nagy N. et al . Long-term follow-up and factors predictive of recurrence in Barrett's esophagus treated by argon plasma coagulation and acid suppression. Endoscopy. 2002; 34 950-955
- 4 Ell C, May A, Gossner L. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2000; 118 670-677
- 5 Overholt B F. Photodynamic therapy for Barrett's esophagus: follow-up in 100 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 49 1-7
- 6 Sampliner R E. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97 1888-1895
- 7 Devesa S S, Blot W J, Fraumeni J F Jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer. 1998; 83 2049-2053
- 8 Cameron A J. Epidemiology of Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2002; 15 106-108
- 9 Gerson L B, Shetler K, Triadafilopoulos G. Prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in asymptomatic individuals. Gastroenterology. 2002; 123 461-467
- 10 Incarbone R, Bonavina L, Szachnowicz S. et al . Rising incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Western countries: is it possible to identify a population at risk?. Dis Esophagus. 2000; 13 275-278
- 11 Dulai G S, Guha S, Kahn K L. et al . Preoperative prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2002; 122 26-33
W. M. Weinstein, M.D.
Dept. of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases
UCLA Center for Health Sciences 44-138 · Box 951684 · Los Angeles · CA 90095-1684 · USA
Fax: + 1-310-825-1700
eMail: wweinste@ucla.edu