Lengthening of Replanted or Revascularized Lower Limbs: Is Length Discrepancy a Contraindication for Limb Salvage?

ABSTRACT

Some replantation cases require substantial bone shortening for primary closure. Leg-length discrepancy can be restored by lengthening of the replanted or revascularized extremities. Between 1991 and 2000, four patients with four total and two subtotal below-knee amputations had replantation or revascularization for their severely damaged extremities. All of them had extensive debridement, vascular repair, bone shortening and nerve repair for sensibility of their soles. One of the replanted extremities failed and had to undergo below-knee amputation because of sepsis. No other infection or vascular complications were encountered following the replantations or revascularizations. After bony consolidation, four legs were lengthened; for elimination of length discrepancy in three cases, and for obtaining balanced body proportion in one case in which the other leg was also amputated. In all procedures, a unilateral dynamic axial external fixator was used. The lengthening was performed from the proximal tibial metaphysis, with a subperiosteal osteotomy. Evaluation of injury according to the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) would encourage the surgeon to avoid salvage surgery with a shortened extremity, because of the required debridement of soft tissue and bone. These authors think the amount of limb shortening is not a major criterion in evaluating a traumatic total or subtotal below-knee amputation for salvage replantation or revascularization. A knee that has stable joint motion and the possibility of preservation of sensibility of the sole broadens the scope of indications for limb salvage, even with deliberate shortening that can be restored by lengthening; length discrepancy is not a contraindication for limb salvage.

KEYWORDS

Lower limb replantation - revascularization - lengthening

REFERENCES

• 1 Johansen K, Daines N, Howey T. Objective criteria accurately predict amputation following lower extremity trauma.  J Trauma . 1990;  30 568-573
• 2 Guelmi K, Maladry D, Mitz V, Lemerle J P. Foot replantation followed by tibial lengthening: a propos of a case.  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot . 1991;  77 53-56
• 3 Datiashvili R O, Chichkin V G. Successful replantation of the lower leg after 42-hour ischemia: case report.  J Reconstr Microsurgery . 1992;  8 447-453
• 4 Betz A M, Stock W, Hierner R, Baumgart R. Primary shortening with secondary limb lengthening in severe injuries of the lower leg: a six year experience.  Microsurgery . 1993;  14 446-443
• 5 Datiashvili R O. Simultaneous replantation of both lower legs in a child: a long-term result.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993;  91 541-547
• 6 Datiashvili R O, Oganesian O V, Chichkin V G. Rehabilitation of patients after lower limb replantations by the bone distraction method.  J Trauma . 1993;  35 368-374
• 7 Pascarel X, Peres J M, Le Clouerec G. Humeral lengthening after replantation of the upper limb.  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot . 1994;  80 450-453
• 8 Mirzoyan A E. Reimplantation and lengthening with use of the Ilizarov apparatus after a traumatic amputation of the leg: a case report.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1996;  78A 437-438
• 9 Betz A M, Hierner R, Baumgart R. Primary shortening-secondary lengthening: a new treatment concept for reconstruction of extensive soft tissue and bone injuries after 3^rd degree open fracture and amputation of the lower leg.  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir . 1998;  30 30-39
• 10 Fink B, Singer J, Braunstein S. Behavior of blood vessels during lower-leg lengthening using the Ilizarov method.  J Pediatr Orthop . 1999;  19 748-753