Download PDF
Pneumologie 2002; 56(4): 240-246
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-25073
Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Nutzen eines intensiven Trainingsprogrammes bei Patienten mit obstruktiver Atemwegskrankheit

Effects of a High Intensity Training Program on Patients with Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease (COAD)M.  Hentschel1 , J.  Becker1 , H.-J.  Lepthin1
  • 1Fachklinik Aukrug der LVA Schleswig-Holstein
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 April 2002 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

In einer kontrollierten/prospektiven klinischen Studie untersuchten wir 125 Patienten mit chronisch obstruktiver Atemwegskrankheit (Alter 48,2 ± 11 Jahre, FEV1 62,7 ± 13 % des Solls), von denen 84 ein sportmedizinisch orientiertes Trainingsprogramm hoher Intensität auf dem Fahrradergometer absolvierten. Spiroergometrisch wurde die anaerobe Schwelle (AT) bestimmt und daraus die Trainingsbelastung abgeleitet (AT + 40 % der Differenz zur Maximalleistung). Angestrebt wurden im Verlauf von 4 Wochen minimal 22 Trainingseinheiten à 40 Minuten. Bei vergleichbarer Verbesserung der Lungenfunktion durch Optimierung der Medikation und Physiotherapie fand sich nur für die Trainingsgruppe eine statistisch signifikante Verbesserung der maximalen Leistungsfähigkeit (VO2 max Zunahme um 286,4 vs. 72,4 ml im Kontrollkollektiv, maximale Wattleistung verbessert um 20,0 vs. 5,7 Watt), der Ausdauerleistungsfähigkeit (AT verbessert um 8,4 vs. 5,1 Watt), subjektiver und metabolischer Beanspruchung bei der Trainingsbelastung sowie der Lebensqualität (SF-36).

Abstract

In a controlled/prospective clinical trial we examined 125 patients with moderate COAD, 84 of which performed a high-intensity training program on cycle ergometers. Methods: All participants (controls n = 39, training-group n = 84, age 48.7 versus 48.1 years, FEV1 62.3 % vs. 63.1 % of predicted) were examined spiroergometrically (ramp protocol, increment 10 W/min), the anaerobic threshold (AT) determined and a training intensity calculated (AT + 40 % of the difference to peak exercise). Training was carried out on cycle ergometers with 5 training units weekly at 40 minutes each. We aimed at a minimum of 22 training units during 4 weeks. Results: Both groups improved in the lung function at rest (FEV1 + 11 % versus + 12 % in the controls). Only for the training group we found a statistically significant improvement in maximum exercise capacity (O2 uptake + 286.4 ml vs. + 72.4 ml, maximum workrate + 20.0 watts vs. + 5.7 W), of the anaerobic threshold (AT improved by 8.4 watts vs. 5.1 W) as well as in the metabolic load (lactate decreased by 1.3 mmol vs. 0.2 mmol, ventilation decreased by 3.8 l/min vs. 2.3 l/min). In most subscales of the SF-36 questionnaire quality of living improved more clearly in the training group, whereas the LAQ questionnaire showed no group-specific differences and no improvement after training. Conclusion: We conclude from the result that a high intensity training program can be recommended as a useful and low-risk component in pulmonary rehabilitation programs.

Literatur

  • 1 Donner C F, Muir J F. Selection criteria and programmes for pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients.  Eur Respir J. 1997;  10 744-757
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Patessio A, Casaburi R, Prefaut C, Folgering H, Donner C. Excercise training in chronic lung disease: exercise prescription.  Eur Respir Mon. 1997;  6 129-140
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hollmann W, Hettinger Th. Sportmedizin, Arbeits- und Trainingsgrundlagen. Schattauer 1990: 476-483
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Gosselink R, Troosters T, Decramer M. Exercise training in COPD patients: the basic questions.  Eur Respir J. 1997;  10 2884-2891
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Casaburi R, Patessio A, Ioli F, Zanaboni S, Donner C F, Wassermann K. Reductions in exercise lactic acidosis and ventilations as a result of exercise training in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease.  Am Rev Resp Dis. 1991;  143 9-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Carter R, Coast R, Idell S. Exercise training with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.  Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1992;  24: 3 281-291
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Behnke M, Taube C, Kirsten D, Lehnigk B, Jörres R A, Magnussen H. Long term effects of home-based exercise training in patients with severe COPD.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;  159 A477
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Baum M, Liesen H. Sport und Immunsystem.  Dt Ärztebl. 1998;  95 [Heft 10] A-538-541
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dickhut H.-H, Löllgen H. Trainingsberatung für Sporttreibende.  Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 1996;  93 939-943
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Borg G AV. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;  14 377-381
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Muehlig S, Petermann F. Krankheitsspezifische Erhebungsverfahren zur Lebensqualität bei Patienten mit Asthma und chronisch-obstruktiver Bronchitis.  Rehabilitation. 1998 Aug;  37; 3 25-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 ERS Consensus Statement . Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.  Eur Respir Rev. 1996;  6: 39 270-275
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pulmonary Rehabilitation . Joint ACCP/AACVPR Evidence-Bases Guidelines.  Chest. 1997;  112 1363-1396
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Empfehlungen der Deutschen Atemwegsliga zum Sport und körperlichen Training bei Patienten mit obstruktiven Atemwegserkrankungen. Pneumologie 2000 54: 61-67
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Wijkstra P J, Van der Mark T W, Kraan J, Van Altena R, Koeter G H, Postma D S. Long-term effects of home rehabilitation on physical performance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;  153 1234-1241
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wijkstra P J, Ten Vergert E M, Van Altena R, Otten V, Kraan J, Postma D S, Koeter G H. Long term benefits of rehabilitation at home on quality of life and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.  Thorax. 1995;  50 824-828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Clark C J, Cochrane L, Mackay E. Low intensity peripheral muscle conditioning improves exercise tolerance and breathlessness in COPD.  Eur Resp J. 1996 Dec; 9705;  9; 12 2590-2596
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Maltais F, Le Blanc P, Simard C, Jobin J, Berube C, Bruneau J, Carrier L, Belleau R. Skeletal muscle adaptation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;  154; 2 Pt 1 442-447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lacasse Y, Wong E, Guyatt G H, King D, Cook D J, Goldstein R S. Meta-analysis of respiratory rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.  Lancet. 1996 Oct 26; 9702;  348; 9035 1115-1119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chest Editorials . Is there really a controversy surrounding the effectiveness of respiratory rehabilitation in COPD?.  Chest. July 1998;  114 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Casaburi R. Exercise Training in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. In Principles and Practice of Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Saunders 1993: 204-224
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Patessio A. Exercise training in lung disease.  Eur Respir Mon. 2000;  13 90-98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Juniper E, Guyatt G, Ferrie P, Griffith L. Measuring Quality of Life in Asthma.  Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;  147 832-838
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bergmann K Ch. Asthma und Lebensqualität. Präv.-Rehab., Jahrgang 6 1994 4: 154-158
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Donner C F, Carone M, Bertolotti G, Zotti A M. Methods of assessment of quality of life.  European Respiratory Review. 1997;  7 67-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Boueri F MV, Bucher-Bartelson B L, Glenn K A, Make B J. Quality of Life Measured With a Generic Instrument (Short Form-36) Improves Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with COPD.  Chest. 2001;  119 77-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. med. H.-J. Lepthin

Fachklinik Aukrug der LVA Schleswig-Holstein

24611 Aukrug-Tönsheide

      >