Download PDF
Aktuelle Urol 2001; 32(5): 291-301
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-17286
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

„Auf der Suche nach dem Heiligen Gral”: Das efferente Segment in der kontinenten kutanen Harnableitung

“The Search for the Holy Grail”: The Efferent Segment in Continent Cutaneous Urinary DiversionE.  W.  Gerharz
  • Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik der Bayerischen Julius Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 May 2004 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Zwanzig Jahre klinisch relevanter kontinenter kutaner Harnableitung haben bezüglich der Reservoirbildung einen breiten Konsensus, im Hinblick auf afferenten und efferenten Schenkel aber ungezählte und erbitterte Kontroversen hervorgebracht: Während die Detubularisierung und sphärische Rekonfiguration von Darm zur Schaffung eines großkapazitären Niederdruckreservoirs (mit dem Vorbehalt der Verwendung unterschiedlicher Darmabschnitte) als Standard unumstößlich etabliert werden konnte, konkurrieren bis in die unmittelbare Gegenwart hinein unterschiedliche Techniken zur Harnleiterimplantation und Konstruktion eines Kontinenzmechanismus miteinander. Liegt bei der ureterointestinalen Anastomose der Akzent der Diskussion auf der Grundsatzfrage nach der Notwendigkeit einer chirurgischen Refluxvermeidung, wird die Auseinandersetzung um das optimale Kontinenzorgan von technisch-operativen Aspekten beherrscht. Auf breiter klinischer und publizistischer Front durchgesetzt hat sich hierbei die Appendix vermiformis, gefolgt von invaginiertem, getapertem oder transversal retubularisiertem Ileum, dem „full thickness”-Darmlappen und dem Ureter als einziger nicht-intestinaler Struktur. Die meisten Optionen basieren im weitesten Sinne auf dem Mitrofanoff-(flap valve)Prinzip, erreichen zuverlässig primäre Kontinenzraten jenseits der 90 % und erfahren eine hohe Akzeptanz von Seiten der Patienten. Während der Einsatz artifizieller Sphinktersysteme erwartungsgemäß zu durchweg enttäuschenden Ergebnissen führte, eröffnet Tissue engineering interessante Perspektiven; praktikable Lösungen fehlen bislang allerdings auch hier.

Abstract

Two decades of clinical experience with continent cutaneous urinary diversion have led to a broad consensus on reservoir formation, but not on the selection of efferent and afferent segments. Whereas detubularization and spherical reconfiguration of small and/or large bowel has become the undisputed standard procedure for creation of a low pressure, high capacity urinary reservoir, uretero-intestinal anastomosis and construction of the continence mechanism remain contentious issues. The argument in ureteral implantation is on whether reflux prevention is at all necessary, while the discussion about the ideal efferent limb centers on technical aspects of construction.

By far the most popular structure for construction of a continence mechanism is the vermiform appendix, followed by tapered, intussuscepted or transversely retubularized ileum, and full thickness bowel flaps. The ureter is the only non-intestinal tube with practical value. Most techniques are based on the so called Mitrofanoff (flap valve) principle which provides reliable continence in more than 90 % of cases and high patient acceptance.

Artificial sphincter systems give disappointing results in the setting of urinary diversion. In the future, the construction of efferent conduits with muscular sphincters by tissue engineering may be possible and is an area of active laboratory research.

Literatur

  • 1 Abd-el-Gawad G, Abrahamsson K, Hanson E, Norlen L, Sillen U, Sixt R, Hjalmas K. Evaluation of Kock urinary reservoir function in children and adolescents at 3 - 10 years' follow-up.  Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1999;  33 149-155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Arai Y, Kawakita M, Terachi T, Oishi K, Okada Y, Takeuchi H, Yoshida O. Long-term follow-up of the Kock and Indiana pouch procedures.  J Urol. 1993;  150 51-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ashken M H. Continent ileocaecal reservoir.  J R Soc Med. 1978;  150 357-360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bell C RW, Gujral S, Collins G NA, Sibley G NA, Persad R A. The fate of the urethra after definitive treatment of invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.  Br J Urol. 1999;  83 607-612
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ben-Chaim J, Rodriguez R, Docimo S G. Concealed umbilical stoma: description of a modified technique.  J Urol. 1995;  154 1169-1170
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Benchekroun A. Hydraulic valve for continence and antireflux. A 17-year experience of 210 cases.  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1992;  142 66-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Benchekroun A, Lakrissa A, Tazi A, Mikou A. Vessie ileo-caecale continente a propos de 33 cas.  Chirurgie. 1980;  106 668-672
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bihrle R. The Indiana pouch continent urinary reservoir.  Urol Clin N Am. 1997;  24 773-779
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bissada N K. Favorable experience with a simple technique to create a concealed umbilical stoma.  J Urol. 1998;  159 1174-1175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bricker E M. Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration.  Surg Clin N Am. 1950;  30 1511-1521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cain M P, Casale A J, King S J, Rink R C. Appendicovesicostomy and newer alternatives for the Mitrofanoff procedure: results in the last 100 patients at Riley Children's Hospital.  J Urol. 1999;  162 1749-1752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Carr L K, Webster G D. Kock versus right colon continent urinary diversion: comparison of outcome and reoperative rate.  Urology. 1996;  48 711-714
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Chanturaia Z, Pertia A, Managadze G, Khvadagiani G, Chigogidze L, Managadze L. Right colonic reservoir with submucosally embedded tapered ileum - “Tiflis pouch”.  Urol Int. 1997;  59 113-118
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Davidsson T, Hedlund H, Mansson W. Detubularized right colonic reservoir with intussuscepted ileal nipple valve or stapled ileal (“Lundiana”) outlet. Clinical and urodynamic results in a prospective randomized study.  World J Urol. 1996;  14 78-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Duckett J W, Snyder H M. Continent urinary diversion: variations on the Mitrofanoff principle.  J Urol. 1986;  136 58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Figueroa T E, Sobagol L, Helal M, Lockhart J L. The tapered and reimplanted small bowel as a variation of the Mitrofanoff procedure: preliminary results.  J Urol. 1994;  152 73-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gerharz E W, Köhl U, Weingärtner K, Melekos M D, Bonfig R, Riedmiller H. Complications related to different continence mechanisms in ileocecal reservoirs.  J Urol. 1997;  158 1709-1713
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gerharz E W, Tassadaq T, Pickard R S, Shah P J, Woodhouse C RJ, Ransley P G. Transverse retubularized ileum: early clinical experience with a new second line Mitrofanoff tube.  J Urol. 1998;  159 525-528
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gerharz E W, Weingärtner K, Köhl U, Dopatka T, Basler H D, Riedmiller H. Quality of life following cystectomy and urinary diversion - an interdisciplinary retrospective study.  J Urol. 1997;  158 778-785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gerharz E W, Vik V, Webb G, Woodhouse C RJ. The in situ-appendix in the MACE (Malone antegrade continence enema) - procedure for faecal incontinence.  Br J Urol. 1997;  79 985-986
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gilchrist R K, Merricks J W, Hamlin H H, Rieger I T. Construction of a substitute bladder and urethra.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1950;  90 752-760
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hart S, Skinner E C, Meyerowitz B E, Boyd S, Lieskovsky G, Skinner D G. Quality of life after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients with an ileal conduit, cutaneous or urethral Kock pouch.  J Urol. 1999;  162 77-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hautmann R E, de Petriconi R, Gottfried H W, Kleinschmidt K, Mattes R, Paiss T. Ileal Neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of follow-up.  J Urol. 1999;  161 422-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Henriet M P, Neyra P, Elman B. Kock pouch procedures: continuing experience and evolution in 135 cases.  J Urol. 1991;  146 16-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hinman F. Functional classification of conduits for continent diversion.  J Urol. 1990;  144 27-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Horowitz M, Kuhr C S, Mitchell M E. The Mitrofanoff catheterizable channel: patient acceptance.  J Urol. 1995;  153 771-772
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Khoury A E, Van Savage J G, McLourie G A, Churchill B M. Minimizing stomal stenosis in appendicovesicostomy using the modified umbilical stoma.  J Urol. 1996;  155 2050-2051
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kock N G. Intra-abdominal “resevoir” in patients with permanent ileostomy.  Arch Surg. 1969;  99 223-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kock N G, Kock A E, Nilsson L O, Norlen L J, Philipson B M. Urinary diversion via a continent ileal reservoir: clinical results in twelve patients.  J Urol. 1982;  128 469-475
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Könyves J, Davidsson T, Wullt B, Mansson W. Continent cutaneous urinary diversion with the Lundiana pouch - the first 72 cases.  Eur Urol. 1999;  35 (supplement) 30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lampel A, Fisch M, Stein R, Schultz-Lampel D, Hohenfellner M, Eggersmann C, Hohenfellner R, Thüroff J W. Continent diversion with the Mainz pouch.  World J Urol. 1996;  14 85-91
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lampel A, Hohenfellner M, Schultz-Lampel D, Thüroff J W. In situ tunneled bowel flap tubes: 2 new techniques of a continent outlet for Mainz pouch cutaneous diversion.  J Urol. 1995;  153 308-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lampel A, Thüroff J W. Bowel-flap tubes for continent cutaneous urinary diversion.  World J Urol. 1998;  16 235-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lampel A, Thüroff J W, Roth S. Modified seromuscular tube: serosa lined bowel wall imbrication as a continent outlet for continent cutaneous urinary diversion.  J Urol. 2000;  163 201-204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lebret T, Herve J M, Barre P. Urethral recurrence of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Predictive values of preoperative latero-montanal biopsies and urethral frozen sections during prostatocystectomy.  Eur Urol. 1998;  33 170-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Leissner J, Black P, Fisch M, Hockel M, Hohenfellner R. Colon pouch (Mainz pouch III) for continent urinary diversion after pelvic irradiation.  Urology. 2000;  56 798-802
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lengemann P. Ersatz der extirpierten Harnblase durch das Coecum.  Zentralbl Chir. 1913;  40 14-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Leonard M P, Quinlan D M. The Benchekroun ileal valve. Partial and total bladder reconstruction.  Urol Clin N Am. 1991;  18 717-724
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Light J K. Use of the artificial urinary sphincter around bowel.  In: Webster GD, Goldwasser B (Hrsg.). Urinary Diversion. Oxford: Isis Medical Media 1995: 244-251
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Makkas M. Zur Behandlung der Blasenektopie. Umwandlung des ausgeschalteten Coecum zur Blase und der Appendix zur Urethra.  Zentralbl Chir. 1910;  37 1073-1076
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mansson A, Mansson W. When the bladder is gone - quality of life with different forms of urinary diversion.  World J Urol. 1999;  17 211-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Marshall I Y, Bissada N K. Study of the unaltered in situ appendix as a native continence mechanism: cadaveric and clinical correlation.  J Invest Surg. 1995;  8 147-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 McGuire M S, Grimaldi G, Grotas J, Russo P. The type of urinary diversion after radical cystectomy significantly impacts on the patient's quality of life.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;  7 4-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Mitrofanoff P. Cystostomie continente trans-appendiculaire dans le traitement des vessies neurologiques.  Chir Ped. 1980;  21 297-305
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Monti P R, Lara R C, Dutra M A, de Carvalho J R. New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle.  Urology. 1997;  49 112-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Mouriquand P D, Boddy S. Salvage procedures for failed Benchekroun hydraulic valves: experiences in four patients.  Br J Urol. 1996;  77 740-744
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Mundy A R. The future of Urology. Vorgetragen anlässlich der Jahrestagung der British Association of Urological Surgeons. Dublin 25. - 28. Juni 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Narayanaswamy B, Wilcox D T, Cuckow P M, Duffy P G, Ransley P G. The Yang-Monti ileovesicostomy: a problematic channel?.  BJU Int. 2001;  87 861-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Nieh P T. The Kock pouch urinary reservoir.  Urol Clin North Am. 1997;  24 755-772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Okada Y, Shichiri Y, Terai A, Kakehi Y, Terachi T, Arai Y, Yoshida O. Management of late complications of continent urinary diversion using the Kock pouch and the Indiana pouch procedures.  Int J Urol. 1996;  3 334-339
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Riedmiller H. Kommentar.  Akt Urol. 1998;  29 II
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Riedmiller H, Bürger R, Müller S, Thüroff J W, Hohenfellner R. Continent appendix stoma: a modification of the Mainz pouch technique.  J Urol. 1990;  143 1115-1116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Ronzoni G, De Vecchis M, Raschi R, Cuneo L, Cagossi M. Rome pouch: preperitoneal continent ileal reservoir with hydraulic valve.  Br J Urol. 1992;  70 514-518
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Roth S, Weining C, Hertle L. Continent cutaneous urinary diversion using the full-thickness bowel flap tube continence mechanism: a simplified tunneling technique.  J Urol. 1996;  156 1922-1925
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Sanda M G, Jeffs R D, Gearhart J P. Evolution of outcomes with the ileal hydraulic valve continent diversion: reevaluation of the Benchekroun catheterizable stoma.  World J Urol. 1996;  14 108-111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Skinner D G, Lieskovsky G, Boyd S D. Continuing experience with the continent ileal reservoir (Kock pouch) as an alternative to cutaneous urinary diverison: an update after 250 cases.  J Urol. 1987;  137 1140-1145
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Stein R, Pfitzenmaier J, Behringer M, Hohenfellner R, Thüroff J W. The long-term results (5 - 16 years) of the Mainz pouch I technique at a single institution.  J Urol. 2001;  165 (suppl) A360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Studer U E, Hautmann R E, Hohenfellner M, Mills R D, Okada Y, Rowland R G, Tobisu K, Tsukamoto T. Indications for continent diversion following cystectomy and factors affecting long term results. Vorgetragen anlässlich des 5. International Consensus Meeting on Bladder Cancer, Tokio, Japan. 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Sullivan H, Gilchrist R K, Merricks J W. Ileocecal substitute bladder: long-term follow-up.  J Urol. 1973;  109 43-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Tasker J H. Ileo-cystoplasty: a new technique: an experimental study with report of a case.  Br J Urol. 1953;  25 349-353
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Thüroff J W, Alken P, Riedmiller H, Engelmann U, Jacobi G H, Hohenfellner R. The Mainz pouch (mixed augmentation ileum and cecum) for bladder augmentation and continent diversion.  J Urol. 1986;  136 17-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Thüroff J W, Alken P, Riedmiller H, Jacobi G H, Hohenfellner R. 100 cases of Mainz pouch: continuing experience and evolution.  J Urol. 1988;  140 283-288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Verhoogen J. Neostomie uretero-caecale. Formation d'une nouvelle poche vesicale et d'un nouvel uretre.  Ass Franc d'Urol. 1908;  12 362-365
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Watson H S, Bauer S B, Peters C A, Mandell J, Colodny A H, Atala A, Retik A B. Comparative urodynamics of appendiceal and ureteral Mitrofanoff conduits in children.  J Urol. 1995;  154 878-882
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Weijerman P C, Schurmans J R, Hop W C, Schroder F H, Bosch J L. Morbidity and quality of life in patients with orthotopic and heterotopic continent urinary diversion.  Urology. 1998;  51 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Woodhouse C RJ. Long-term results of the Mitrofanoff-Stoma.  Dial Ped Urol. 1999;  22 7-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Woodhouse C RJ. Reconstructive Urology (1).  In: Gerharz EW, Emberton M, O'Brien T (Hrsg.). Classic Papers in Urology. London: Isis Medical Media 1999: 183-203
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Woodhouse C RJ, MacNeily A E. The Mitrofanoff principle: expanding upon a versatile technique.  Br J Urol. 1994;  74 447-453
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Yang W-H. Yang needle tunneling technique in creating antireflux and continent mechanisms.  J Urol. 1993;  150 830-834
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Zingg E, Tscholl R. Continent cecoileal conduit: preliminary report.  J Urol. 1977;  118 724-728
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. E. W. Gerharz

Julius Maximilians-Universität

Josef Schneider Str. 2

97080 Würzburg

Phone: +49 931 201 5181

Fax: +49 931 201 3828

Email: elmar.gerharz@mail.uni-wuerzburg.de