RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-16899
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Der Familien-Belastungs-Fragebogen (FaBel-Fragebogen)
Testung und Validierung der deutschen Version der „Impact on Family Scale” bei Familien mit behinderten KindernThe Testing and Validation of the German Version of the Impact on Family Scale in Families with Children with Disabilities (Familien-Belastungs[FaBel]-Questionnaire)Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
31. August 2001 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/ppmp/2001910/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-2001-16899-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Im deutschen Sprachraum fehlte bisher ein Verfahren zur Erfassung der familiären Belastung durch die Erkrankung von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Die im angloamerikanischen Sprachraum entwickelte Impact on Family Scale zur Selbstbeurteilung der Auswirkung chronischer Erkrankungen im Kindesalter auf die Familie wurde ins Deutsche übersetzt und psychometrisch geprüft. Als deutschsprachiger Familien-Belastungs-Fragebogen (FaBel-Fragebogen) enthält der Fragebogen 33 Likert-skalierte Items zur Erfassung der täglichen sozialen Belastung der Eltern, der persönlichen Belastung, der Belastung der Geschwisterkinder, der finanziellen Belastung, der Bewältigungsprobleme mit der Belastung sowie eines Summenwertes (total score) der Belastungen insgesamt. Der Fragebogen wurde in einer Querschnittsuntersuchung bei 273 Familien mit chronisch kranken und behinderten Kindern eingesetzt und auf die psychometrischen Gütekriterien Reliabilität und Validität geprüft. Die Ergebnisse der Prüfung des FaBel-Fragebogens zeigen eine gute Akzeptanz durch die Befragten, eine akzeptable Konstruktvalidität des Verfahrens, gute interne Konsistenz und Hinweise auf diskriminante Validität. Die psychometrische Struktur des Verfahrens konnte an einem anderen Kollektiv von Kindern mit chronischen Erkrankungen bestätigt werden. Die Ergebnisse weisen auf die Eignung des FaBel-Fragebogens zur Erfassung der familiären Belastung bei chronischen Erkrankungen und Behinderungen von Kindern und Jugendlichen hin.
The Testing and Validation of the German Version of the Impact on Family Scale in Families with Children with Disabilities (Familien-Belastungs[FaBel]-Questionnaire)
Despite increased interest in the wellbeing of families with children with chronic conditions and disabilities, instruments to assess family impact of health conditions are still lacking in German speaking countries. The Impact on Family Scale has been developed in the Anglo-american literature as a self report instrument to assess the consequences of chronic conditions and disability in childhood and adolescence for the family. The present paper describes the translation and psychometric testing of a German version of the Impact on Family scale (Familien-Belastungs[FaBel]-Questionnaire). The questionnaire contains 33 Likert-scaled items to assess the general negative impact of parents, the description of social relationships, the concern for siblings, the financial impact and problems in coping as well as a total score. The FaBel questionnaire was used and tested for psychometric criteria of reliability and validity in a cross-sectional study of 273 families with children with chronic conditions and disabilities. The results of this psychometric testing of the FaBel-Questionnaire show acceptance by responders, acceptable construct validity, good internal consistency and discriminant validity. The psychometric structure of the questionnaire corresponds with psychometric results with another German population of children with chronic conditions. The results suggest the applicability of the instrument to assess family impact of chronic disease and disability in children and adolescents.
Key words
Psychosocial strain - Family - Disability - Assessment - Chronic
Literatur
- 1 Stein R, Riessman C. The Development of an Impact-on-Family-Scale: Preliminary Findings. Medical Care. 1980; 4 465-472
- 2 Bullinger M, Ravens-Sieberer U. Health-related quality of life assessment in children: A review of the literature. European Review of Applied Psychology. 1995; 45 245-254
- 3 Thyen U. Chronische Erkrankungen und Behinderungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen - häusliche Pflege, Belastungen der Mütter, familiäre Funktion und psychosoziale Unterstützung. Lübeck; Habilitationsschrift an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Medizinischen Universität zu Lübeck 1999
- 4 Seiffke-Krenke I. (Hrsg) .Jahrbuch der Medizinischen Psychologie, Bd. 4: Krankheitsverarbeitung bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Berlin; Springer 1990: 300-315
- 5 Drotar D. Relating parent and family functioning to the psychological adjustment of children with chronic health conditions: What have we learned? What do we need to know?. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 1997; 22 149-165
- 6 Comitee on Children with Disabilities. Provision of related services for children with chronic disabilities. Pediatrics. 1993; 92 879-881
- 7 Eiser C. Growing up with a chronic disease: The impact on children and their families. London, Philadelphia; Jessica Kingsley Publishers 1993
-
8 Perrin J M, Thyen U, Bloom S.
Care at Home for Children with Chronic Illness - Program and Policy Implications. In: Fox DM, Raphael C (eds) Home-Based Care for a New Century. Malden, MA; Milbank Memorial Fund & Blackwell Publishers 1997: 219-243 - 9 Thompson R J, Gustafson K E. Adaptation to Chronic Childhood Illness. Washington DC; American Psychological Association 1996
- 10 Lavigne J V, Faier-Routman J. Psychological adjustment to pediatric physical disorders: a meta-analytical review. J Ped Psychol. 1992; 13 7-22
- 11 Stein R E, Jessop D J. Does pediatric home care make a difference for children with chronic illness? Findings from the Pediatric Ambulatory Care Treatment Study. Pediatrics. 1984; 73 845-53
- 12 Pless I B. The family as a resource unit in health care: changing patterns. Soc-Sci-Med. 1984; 19 385-9
- 13 Perrin J M, MacLean W E, Perrin E C. Parental perceptions of health status and psychologic adjustment of children with asthma. Pediatrics. 1989; 83 26-30
- 14 Perrin E C, Newacheck P W, Pless B. et al . Issues involved in the definition and classification of chronic health conditions. Pediatrics. 1993; 91 787-793
- 15 Saddler A L, Hillman S B, Benjaminis D. The influence of disabling condition visibility on family functioning. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 1992; 18 425-439
- 16 Stein R EK, Baumann L J, Westbrook L E. et al . Framework for identifying children who have chronic conditions: The case for a new definition. Journal of Pediatrics. 1993; 122 342-347
- 17 Jessop D J, Riessman C K, Stein R EK. Chronic Childhood Illness and Maternal Mental Helath. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998; 9 147-156
- 18 Ireys H T, Grason H A, Guyer B. Assuring Quality of Care for Children with Special Needs in Managed Care Organizations. Roles for Pediatricians. 1996; 98 178-185
- 19 Ireys H T, Silver E J. Perception of the Impact of a child's chronic illness: does it predict maternal mental health?. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1996; 17 77-83
- 20 McCormick M C, Charney E B, Stemmler M M. Assessing the Impact of a Child with Spina Bifida on the Family. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986; 28 53-61
- 21 Loebig M. Mother's Assessment of the Impact of Children with Spina Bifida on the Family. Maternal Child Nursing Journal. 1990; 19 251-264
- 22 McCormick M C, Stemmler M M, Athreya B H. The Impact of Childhood Rheumatic Diseases on the Family. Arthritis Rheum. 1986; 29 827-879
- 23 Sheeber L B, Johnson J H. Applicability of the Impact on Family Scale of Assessing Families with Behaviorally Difficult Children. Psychological Reports. 1992; 71 155-159
- 24 Juniper E F, Guyatt G H, Feeney D H. et al . Measuring quality of life in the parents of children with asthma. Quality of Life Res. 1996; 5 27-34
- 25 Wade S, Taylor H G, Drotar D. et al . Family Burden and Adaptation During the Initial Year after Traumatic Brain Injury in Children. Pediatrics. 1998; 102 110-116
- 26 Lee S K, Penner P L, Cox M. Impact of very low birth weight infants on the family ant its relationship toparental attitudes. Pediatrics. 1991; 88 105-109
- 27 Patterson J M, Leonard B J, Titus J C. Home Care for medically fragile Children: Impact on Family Health and Well-being. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1992; 13 248-255
-
28 Bullinger M, Cella D, Anderson R, Aaronson N K.
Creating and evaluating cross-national instruments. In: Spilker B Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia; Lippincott-Raven 1996: 659-668 - 29 Hayes R, Hayashi T, Carson S, Ware J. Users Guide for the Multitrait Analysis Program (MAP). Rand Coorperation Report No. N-2786-RC 1988
- 30 Lienert G. Testaufbau und Testanalyse. Weinheim; Beltz 1969
- 31 Kazis L E, Anderson J J, Meenan R F. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Medical Care. 1989; 27 (Suppl) 178-189
- 32 Cohen J. A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992; 112 155-159
- 33 Newacheck P W, Stoddard J J. Prevalence and impact of multiple childhood chronic illness. J Pediatr. 1994; 124 40-48
- 34 Stein R EK. (ed) .Caring for Children with Chronic Illness: Issues and Strategies. New York; Springer Publishing Company 1989
- 35 Perrin J M, Shayne M W, Bloom S R. Home and Community Care for Chronically Ill Children. New York, NY; Oxford University Press 1993
- 36 Steinhausen H C. Psychosoziale Aspekte bei chronischen Erkrankungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 1996; 40 2007-2009
1 Total Impact: 19 Items (F1, F4, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, F13, F15, F18, F19, F20, F21, F22, F23, F24, F26, F27).
2 General Negative Impact: 10 Items (F6, F9, F10, F14, F18, F21, F22, F23, F24, F27).
3 Disruption of Social Relations: 9 Items (F7, F8, F10, F11, F13, F15, F17, F18, F20).
4 Financial Support: 3 Items (F1, F4, F10).
5 Coping/Mastery: 4 Items (F12, F16, F17, F25).
6 Siblings: 6 Items (F28, F29, F30, F31, F32, F33).
Dr. Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer (MPH)
Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie, Pav. 69
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Martinistraße 52
20246 Hamburg
eMail: ravens@uke.uni-hamburg.de