PDF herunterladen
Synthesis 2001(11): 1681-1685
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-16759
PAPER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

A Practical One-Pot Synthesis of 5-Aryl-2-furaldehydes

Michael S. McClure, Frank Roschangar*, Stephen J. Hodson, Alan Millar, Martin H. Osterhout
GlaxoSmithKline, Chemical Development - Synthetic Chemistry, Five Moore Drive, P.O. Box 13398, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
Fax: +1(919)3158735; e-Mail: fr83278@gsk.com;
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 25 April 2001
Publikationsdatum:
28. September 2004 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

A useful one-pot synthesis of 5-aryl-2-furaldehydes via palladium-mediated Suzuki coupling of aryl halides with in situ generated 5-(diethoxymethyl)-2-furylboronic acid is described. The procedure has general applicability, delivers high yields, and is amenable to scale-up.

Key words

furylboronic acids - Suzuki cross-coupling - Pd/C - 5-aryl-2-furaldehydes

    References

  • 1a Keay BA. Chem. Soc. Rev.  1999,  28:  209 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 1b Hou XL. Cheung HY. Hon TY. Kwan PL. Lo TH. Tong SY. Wong HNC. Tetrahedron  1998,  54:  1955 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 1c Friedrichsen W. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry   Vol. II:  Bird CW. Elsevier; New York: 1996.  p.351 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2a Lai S. Shizuri Y. Yamamura S. Kawai K. Niwa M. Furukawa H. Heterocycles  1991,  32:  307 
    Google Scholar
  • 2b Nakatsuka S. Feng B. Goto T. Kihara K. Tetrahedron Lett.  1986,  27:  3399 
    Google Scholar
  • 2c DvoŻáËková S. Sedmera P. PotÏilová H. Santav F. imánek V. Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun.  1984,  49:  1536 
    Google Scholar
  • 3a Bailey TR, and Young DC. inventors; International Patent  WO-0010573. 
  • 3c Bailey TR, and Young DC. inventors; International Patent  WO-0013708. 
  • 3e Young DC, and Bailey TR. inventors; International Patent  WO-0018231. 
  • 3g Kobayashi K, Nishiyama T, and Nakaide S. inventors; Japanese Patent  JP-11302280. 
  • 3i Scott IL, Biediger RJ, and Market RV. inventors; International Patent  WO-9853790. 
  • 4a Cockerill GS, and Lackey KE. inventors; International Patent  WO-0104111. 
  • 5a Pong SF. Pelosi SSJr. Wessels FL. Yu C.-N. Burns RH. White RE. Anthony DRJr. Ellis KO. Wright GC. White RLJr. Arzneim.-Forsch.  1983,  33:  1411 
    Google Scholar
  • 5b Burch HA. White RE. Wright GC. Goldenberg MM. J. Pharm. Sci.  1980,  69:  107 
    Google Scholar
  • 5c Snyder HRJr. Davis CS. Bickerton RK. Halliday RP. J. Med. Chem.  1967,  101:  807 
    Google Scholar
  • 6 D’Auria M. Gazz. Chim. Ital.  1989,  119:  419 
    Google Scholar
  • 7a Itahara T. J. Org. Chem.  1985,  50:  5272 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7b Itahara T. J. Org. Chem.  1985,  50:  5546 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bussolari JC. Rehborn DC. Org. Lett.  1999,  1:  965 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9a Hanefeld W. Jung M. Liebigs Ann. Chem.  1994,  59 
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 9b For an elegant one-pot synthesis of 5-(tributylstannyl)-2-furaldehyde from 2-furaldehyde, see: Denat F. Gaspard-Iloughmane JD. Synthesis  1992,  954 
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 10a Starling SM. Raslan DS. de Oliveira AB. Synth. Commun.  1998,  28:  1013 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10b Bracher F. Hildebrand D. Liebigs Ann. Chem.  1992,  1315 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Davis CS. Lougheed GS. J. Heterocycl. Chem.  1967,  4:  153 
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Pelter A. Rowlands M. Clements G. Synthesis  1987,  51 
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Arcadi A. Burini A. Cacchi S. Delmastro M. Marinelli F. Pietroni B. Synlett  1990,  47 
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 16a Florentin D. Roques BP. Fournie-Zaluski MC. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr.  1976,  13:  1999 
    Google Scholar
  • 16b Florentin D. Roques B. C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, Ser. C   1970,  270 :  1608 
    Google Scholar
  • 17a Guerry P, Jolidon S, Masciadri R, Stalder H, and Then R. inventors; International Patent  WO-9616046.  , 29
  • The palladium-catalyzed preparation of 5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)-2-furaldehyde from 5-bromo-2-furaldehyde may have been an attractive alternative approach:
  • 19a Baudoin O. Guénard D. Guéritte F. J. Org. Chem.  2000,  65:  9268 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19b Ishiyama T. Itoh Y. Kitano T. Miyaura N. Tetrahedron Lett.  1997,  38:  3447 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19c Murata M. Watanabe S. Masuda Y. J. Org. Chem.  1997,  62:  6458 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19d Ishiyama T. Murata M. Miyaura N. J. Org. Chem.  1995,  60:  7508 ; however, the high price tag of 5-bromo-2-furaldehyde and the boron reagent [4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane or bis(pinacolato)diboron] presented a significant drawback
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • The effect of donor solvents such as THF and DME on aggregation and reactivity of organolithium species has been investigated:
  • 20a Streitwieser A. Juaristi E. Kim Y.-J. Pugh JK. Org. Lett.  2000,  2:  3739 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20b Reich HJ. Green DP. Medina MA. Goldenberg WS. Gudmundsson B. Dykstra RR. Philips NH. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1998,  120:  7201 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20c Remenar JF. Lucht BL. Collum DB. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1997,  119:  5567 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21a Brown HC. Cole TE. Organometallics  1985,  4:  816 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21b Brown HC. Cole TE. Organometallics  1983,  2:  1316 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suzuki cross-coupling reactions with in situ generated boronic acids have been described:
  • 23a O’Neill BT. Yohannes D. Bundesmann MW. Arnold EP. Org. Lett.  2000,  2:  4201 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23b Andersen NG. Maddaford SP. Keay BA. J. Org. Chem.  1996,  61:  9556 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23c Maddaford SP. Keay BA. J. Org. Chem.  1994,  59:  6501 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23d Cristofoli WA. Keay BA. Tetrahedron Lett.  1991,  32:  5881 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24a Stanforth SP. Tetrahedron  1998,  54:  263 
    Google Scholar
  • 24b Suzuki A. Pure Appl. Chem.  1994,  66:  213 
    Google Scholar
  • 24c Miyaura N. Yanagi T. Suzuki A. Synth. Commun.  1981,  11:  513 
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Rosso VW. Lust DA. Bernot PJ. Grosso JA. Modi SP. Rusowicz A. Sedergran TC. Simpson JH. Srivastava SK. Humora MJ. Anderson NG. Org. Proc. Res. Dev.  1997,  1:  311 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26a O’Keefe DF. Dannock MC. Marcuccio SM. Tetrahedron Lett.  1992,  33:  6679 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26b Kong K.-C. Cheng C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1991,  113:  6313 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27a Badone D. Baroni M. Cardamone R. Ielmini A. Guzzi U. J. Org. Chem.  1997,  62:  7170 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27b Campi EM. Jackson WR. Marcuccio SM. Naeslund GM. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.  1994,  2395 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27c Bumagin NA. Bykov VV. Beletskaya IP. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci.  1989,  38:  2206 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bumagin NA. Bykov VV. Beletskaya IP. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci.  1990,  39:  2426 
    Google Scholar
  • 29a Dyer UC. Shapland PD. Tiffin PD. Tetrahedron Lett.  2001,  42:  1765 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29b Ennis DS. McManus J. Wood-Kaczmar W. Richardson J. Smith GE. Carstairs A. Org. Process Res. Dev.  1999,  3:  248 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29c Gala D. Stamford A. Jenkins J. Kugelman M. Org. Process Res. Dev.  1997,  1:  163 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29d Marck G. Villiger A. Buchecker R. Tetrahedron Lett.  1994,  35:  3277 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
14

Although initial investigations indicated 2-(2-furyl)-1,3-dioxolane to be superior to 2-(diethoxymethyl)furan (4) for boronic acid generation, it has limited availability, and the resulting in situ generated boronic acid is less reactive in the Suzuki coupling. Therefore, our studies were focused on acetal 4.

15

5-Formyl-2-furylboronic acid (2a), available from Frontier Scientific, costs ca. $26,000/mol, while 2-(diethoxymethyl)furan (4) retails at Aldrich for ca. $1,000/mol ($340/kg for bulk quantities).

18

Column: Phenomenex Luna C18(2) 50 mm × 2.0 mm 3 micron. Mobile phase: A = 0.05 % (v/v) TFA in H2O, B = 0.05 % (v/v) TFA in MeCN. Gradient Profile: 0% to 95% B over 8 min. UV detection at λ = 280 nm. 1.0 mL/min flowrate with injection volume of 1.0 µL.

22

Typical degradation products observed upon prolonged standing were 2-(diethoxymethyl)furan (4) and the putative ”dimer" 6 (LC-MS) as shown in the Figure below:

Figure

30

The only type of Pd/C employed for this and all other experiments described herein was 10 wt% (dry basis)palladium on activated carbon, 50% water wet, Degussa type E101NE/W; it was used as purchased from Aldrich.

31

It is conceivable that EtOH enhances solubilization of the reaction components. We determined that omission of EtOH or use of EtOH-DME ratios less than 1:2 resulted in competitive degradation of 5-(diethoxymethyl)-2-furylboronic acid (2b) to 2-(diethoxymethyl)furan (4), thereby preventing complete conversion.