PDF herunterladen
Viszeralchirurgie 2001; 36(2): 49-68
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-12711
AKTUELLE CHIRURGIE
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Einflussfaktoren auf die Anastomosenheilung

Factors that Influence Anastomis HealingG. Meyer, R. A. Lang, F. W. Schildberg
  • Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik im Klinikum Großhadern der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
18. Mai 2004 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung.

Die Anastomosenheilung kann in ihrem regelhaften Verlauf von einer Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Faktoren beeinflusst werden. Dabei ist von übergeordneter Bedeutung die Herstellung einer primär gas- und luftdichten, spannungslosen und gut durchbluteten Naht. Der Operateur und seine individuelle Operationstechnik insgesamt, aber weniger die gewählte Anastomosierungstechnik an sich spielt somit eine entscheidende Rolle. Daneben kann das Heilungsergebnis durch eine Reihe weiterer lokaler und allgemeiner Faktoren beeinflusst werden, deren praktische Relevanz für die Klinik allerdings im Einzelnen nur zum Teil gesichert ist. Dennoch ist ihre Kenntnis und Beachtung wegen der durch den Faktorensynergismus bestimmte Einflussnahme auf das Heilungsergebnis wichtig. Der Wunsch nach einer medikamentösen Heilungsmodulation käme vor allem Risikoanastomosen zugute, konnte aber bislang nur partiell erfüllt werden.

Factors that Influence Anastomis Healing.

Normal anastomotic healing can be influenced by numerous different factors. Achieving a primary gas tight, tension free and well perfused suture is of major importance. This is why the surgeon and his own surgical technique rather than the chosen technique of anastomosis play the leading role in anastomotic healing. In addition to this, the healing result may be influenced by a number of other local or general factors. The clinical relevance of most of these factors, however, has not been proven in prospective studies. Nonetheless, it appears to be most important to know and obey these factors, since they do influence the healing result. The goal of drug assisted anastomotic healing is of special healing for anastomoses in risk patients. This goal, however, has only been reached partially until today.

Schlüsselwörter:

Anastomosen - Anastomosenheilung - Anastomosentechnik - Einflussfaktoren - Gastrointestinaltrakt

Key words:

Anastomoses - anastomotic healing - influencing factors - technique of anastomoses - gastro intestinal tract

Literaturverzeichnis

  • 1 Langer S, Kupczyk D. Entstehung der Nahtinsuffizienz.  Langenbecks Arch Chir (Kongreßbericht 1982):. 1982;  358 253-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Meyer G, Lang R A. Anastomosenheilung.  Viszeralchirurgie. 2000;  35 153-165
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jacobs G, Ulrich B. Klammernahtgeräte am Magen und Dünndarm.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1981;  355 465-469
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bell C M, Lewis C B. Effect of neostigmine on integrity of iliorectal anastomoses.  Br Med J. 1968;  3 587-588
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Brolin R E, Ravitch M M. Studies in intestinal healing VI. Effect of pharmacologically induced peristalsis on fresh intestinal anastomoses in dogs.  Arch Surg. 1980;  115 339-343
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Scheele J. Grundlagen der Anastomosenheilung. In: Scheele J (Hrsg) Fibrinklebung. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo; 1984: S 115-119
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Ballantyne G H. Intestinal suturing - review of the experimental foundations for traditional doctrines.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;  26 836-843
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. IV. Effect of suture technique on collagen metabolism in the colonic wall.  Am J Surg. 1980;  139 406-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Zederfeldt B, Jiborn H, Blomquist P. Effects of different suture techniques on healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg) Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York; 1982: S. 110-121
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Arbogast R, Gay B, Höcht B. Der Einfluß des Nahtmaterials auf die mechanische Belastbarkeit von Darmanastomosen.  Chirurg. 1978;  49 640-644
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Debus E S, Lünstedt B, Geiger D, Schultz U, Thiede A. Handnaht, Klammernaht und Kompressionsanastomose - eine kontrollierte, vergleichende Untersuchung von 3 Anastomosenverfahren am Kolon des Schweines. In: Thiede A, Lünstedt B (Hrsg) Standards in der Viszerosynthese. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona Budapest; 1994: S. 24-31
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Czerny V. Zur Darmresektion.  Berl klin Wschr. 1880;  17 637-642-683-684
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Halsted W S. Circular suture of the intestine - an experimental study.  Am J Med Sci. 1887;  94 436-461
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Buchin R, van Geertruyden J. Valeur comparée des sutures intestinales en un plan et en deux plans. Etude expérimentale et clinique.  Acta Chir Belg. 1960;  59 461-480
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chung R S. Gastrointestinal anastomoses constructed with singly placed staples.  Am J Surg. 1980;  139 876-879
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ellison G W. Wound healing in the gastrointestinal tract.  Semin Vet Med Surg. 1989;  4 287-293
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Graffner H, Andersson L, Löwenhielm P, Walther B. The healing process of anastomoses of the colon. A comparative study using single, double-layer or stapled anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;  27 767-771
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Letwin E, Williams H YG. Healing of intestinal anastomosis.  Can J Surg. 1967;  10 109-116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 McAdams A J, Meikle G, Medina R. An experimental comparison of inversion and eversion colonic anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1969;  12 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Yesilkaya Y, Soyhan N, Bengisu N, Sen M, Aritas Y. The effects of different suture techniques on collagen metabolism in experimental distal colonic anastomoses.  Br J Surg. 1985;  72 987-989
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hamilton J E. Reappraisal of open intestinal anastomoses.  Ann Surg. 1967;  165 917-924
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Müller G, Kieninger G, Breucha G, Bustamante I, Neugebauer W. Vergleichende Untersuchungen ein- und zweireihiger Anastomosen am Schweinedünndarm.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1978;  346 37-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nakanishi H. Experimental gut anastomoses and their revascularization.  Aust NZ J Surg. 1975;  45 309-314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jansen A, Becker A E, Brummelkamp W H, Keeman J N, Klopper P J. The importance of the apposition of the submucosal intestinal layers for primary wound healing of intestinal anastomosis.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;  152 51-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ravitch M M. Observations on the healing of wounds of the intestines.  Surgery. 1975;  77 665-673
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Herrmann J B, Woodward S C, Pulaski E J. Healing of colonic anastomoses in the rat.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964;  119 269-275
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Orr N WM. A single-layer intestinal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1969;  56 771-774
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Irvin T T, Edwards J P. Comparison of single-layer inverting, two-layer inverting, and everting anastomoses in the rabbit colon.  Br J Surg. 1973;  60 453-457
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Stoloff D, Snider III T G, Crawford M P, Taylor H W, Cox H U. End-to-end colonic anastomosis. A comparison of techniques in normal dogs.  Vet Surg. 1984;  13 76-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Högström H, Haglund U, Zederfeldt B. Suture technique and early breaking strength of intestinal anastomoses and laparotomy wounds.  Acta Chir Scand. 1985;  151 441-443
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Bronwell A W, Rutledge R, Dalton Jr M L. Single-layer open gastrointestinal anastomosis.  Ann Surg. 1967;  165 925-932
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Goligher J C. Visceral and parietal suture in abdominal surgery.  Am J Surg. 1976;  131 130-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Goligher J C, Lee PWG; Simpkins K C, Lintott D J. A controlled comparison of one- and two-layer techniques of suture for high and low colorectal anastomoses.  Br J Surg. 1977;  64 609-614
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Heifetz C J. Technique of single-layer end-to-end intestinal anastomosis by triangulation.  Surg Clin N Am. 1966;  46 223-228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Irvin T T, Goligher J C, Johnston D. A randomized prospective clinical trial of single-layer and two-layer inverting intestinal anastomoses.  Br J Surg. 1973;  60 457-460
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. II. Breaking strength of the colon after left colon resection and anastomosis.  Am J Surg. 1978;  136 595-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Olinger A, Hildebrandt U, Pistorius G, Lindemann W, Menger M D. Laparoskopische 2-Etagenfusion der lumbalen Wirbelsäule mit Bagby-and-Kuslich (BAK)-Implantaten.  Chirurg. 1996;  67 348-350
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Raab M, Günther M, Godehardt E, Junginger T h. Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen zum Nahtmaterial und zur Nahttechnik am Magen.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1985;  365 267-277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 McAdams A J, Meikle A G, Taylor J O. One layer or two layer colonic anastomoses?.  Am J Surg. 1970;  120 546-550
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Everett W G. A comparison of one layer and two layer techniques for colorectal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1975;  62 135-140
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Reichel K, Nagel R. Erfahrungen und Komplikationen bei der zwei- und einreihigen Enteroanastomose.  Langenbecks Arch klin Chir. 1969;  323 362-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Langer S, Pesendorfer H, Breining H, Cen M. Klinische und tierexperimentelle Studien zur Anastomosentechnik in der Darmchirurgie.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1974;  335 309-320
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Gill W, Fraser J, Carter D C, Hill R. Everted intestinal anastomosis.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1969;  128 1297-1303
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Hell K. 100 konsekutive Kolonresektionen mittels modifizierter einreihiger Naht.  Helv Chir Acta. 1981;  48 833-837
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Matheson N A, Irving A D. Single layer anastomosis after rectosigmoid resection.  Br J Surg. 1975;  62 239-242
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Peters Jr H E, Stanten A. Aseptic single layer anastomosis of the bowel. A review of one hundred seventy-five cases.  Am J Surg. 1971;  122 159-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Bennett R R, Zydeck F A. A comparison of single layer suture patterns for intestinal anastomosis.  J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1970;  157 2075-2080
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses: the effect of suture technic on collagen concentration in the colonic wall.  Am J Surg. 1978;  135 333-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Jonsson T h, Högström H, Zederfeldt B. Effect of interrupted and continuous suturing on intestinal wound margin strength in rats.  Eur Surg Res. 1993;  25 169-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Olsen G B, Letwin E, Williams H TG. Clinical experience with the use of a single-layer intestinal anastomosis.  Can J Surg. 1968;  11 97-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 John S, Fleischer F, Häring R. The enteroanastomosis: a micro-angiographic study of anastomotic healing.  Chir Gastroent. 1976;  10 165-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Shandall A, Lowndes R, Young H L. Colonic anastomotic healing and oxygen tension.  Br J Surg. 1985;  72 606-609
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Lindell B, Zederfeldt B. Cardiac output distribution after left colonic anastomosis in the rat.  Eur Surg Res. 1979;  11 134-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Schäfer K, Göller M, Stanka P, Ernst R, Zumtobel V. Revaskularisation von Kolonanastomosen.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1991;  376 163-171
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Bailey H R, La Voo J W, Max E, Smith K W, Butts D R, Hampton J M. Single-layer polypropylene colorectal anastomosis. Experience with 100 cases.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;  27 19-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Harder F, Kull C h. Fortlaufende einreihige Darmanastomose.  Chirurg. 1987;  58 269-273
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Vogelbach P, Harder F. Die Technik der Dickdarmanastomosen - die fortlaufende einreihige Kolonanastomose. In: Thiede A, Lünstedt B (Hrsg.) Standards in der Viszerosynthese. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona Budapest; 1994: S. 39-45
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Wayand W, Rieger R, Umlauft M. Ein- oder zweireihig? Eine kontrollierte prospektive Studie zum Vergleich zweier Nahttechniken bei gastrointestinalen Anastomosen.  Chirurg. 1984;  55 650-652
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Zoedler T h, Becker H, Röher H D. Die fortlaufende einreihige Anastomose als Standardverfahren im Gastrointestinaltrakt.  Chirurg. 1995;  66 50-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Ellison G W, Jokinen M P, Park R D. End-to-end approximating intestinal anastomosis in the dog: a comparative fluorescein dye, angiographic and histopathologic evaluation.  J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1982;  18 729-736
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Houdart R, Lavergne A, Galian A, Hautefeuille P. Evolution anatomo-pathologique des anastomoses digestives bord à bord en un plan. Etude de 210 anastomoses coliques chez le rat du 2e au 180e jour.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1983;  7 465-473
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Houdart R, Lavergne A, Valleur P, Villet R, Hautefeuille P. Vascular evolution of single-layer end-on colonic anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 475-480
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Jansen A, Becker A E, Brummelkamp W H, Keeman J N, Klopper P J. The importance of the apposition of the submucosal intestinal layers for primary wound healing of intestinal anastomosis.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;  152 51-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Lamesch A, Dociu N. Die mikrochirurgische Darmnaht: Untersuchungen am Rattendarm.  Z Kinderchir. 1977;  21 263-274
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Schäfer K, Loeweneck H, Stanka H, Ernst R, Zumtobel V. Mikrozirkulationsstörungen bei Colonanastomosen und ihre Bedeutung für die Pathogenese der Nahtinsuffizienz.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1990;  375 24-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Carter D C, Jenkins D HR, Whitfield H N. Omental reinforcement of intestinal anastomoses. An experimental study in the rabbit.  Br J Surg. 1972;  59 129-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Getzen L C, Roe R D, Holloway C K. Comparative study of intestinal anastomotic healing in inverted and everted closures.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1966;  123 1219-1227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Herzog B. Die Darmnaht. Eine tierexperimentelle Studie und Erfahrungen mit einer eigenen Nahttechnik. Aktuelle Probleme in der Chirurgie.  Bd. 20 Huber Bern Stuttgart Wien; 1974
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Ravitch M M, Canalis F, Weinshelbaum A, McCormick J. Studies in intestinal healing: III. Observations on everting intestinal anastomoses.  Ann Surg. 1967;  166 670-680
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Polglase A L, Hughes E SR, McDermott F T, Burke F R. A comparison of end-to-end staple and suture colorectal anastomosis in the dog.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;  152 792-796
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Chowcat N L, Savage F J, Hembry R M, Boulos P B. Role of collagenase in colonic anastomoses: a reappraisal.  Br J Surg. 1988;  75 330-334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Healey Jr J E, Mc Bride C M, Gallager H S. Is serosa-to-serosa approximation necessary in intestinal anastomosis?.  Surg Forum. 1964;  15 297-299
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Hertzler J H, Tuttle W M. Experimental method for an everting end-to-end anastomosis in the gastrointestinal tract.  Arch Surg. 1952;  65 398-405
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Hell K, Allgöwer M. Die Colonresektionen. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York; 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 75 Waninger J, Kauffmann G, Schmidt J, Gorenflo M. Mikroangiographische Befunde experimenteller Darmanastomosen.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 198;  7147 87-91
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Wilker D, Sklarek J, Waldner H, Posel P. Nahtfreie Anastomosen an der Ratte, am Kaninchen und am Schwein.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1988;  373 91-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Ravitch M M, Ong T H, Gazzola L. A new, precise, and rapid technique of intestinal resection and anastomosis with staples.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;  139 6-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Hansen H, Sommer H J, Eichelkraut W. Die Durchblutung handgenähter und geklammerter Colonanastomosen.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1987;  370 141-151
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Karppinen V, Myllärniemi H. The vascular supply of healing wound.  Acta Path Microbiol Scand. 1967;  71 59-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Abramowitz H B, McAlister W H. A comparative study of small-bowel anastomoses by angiography and microangiography.  Surgery. 1969;  66 564-569
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Amosov N M, Berezovsky K K. Pulmonary resection with mechanical suture.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1961;  41 325-335
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Ballantyne G H, Burke J B, Rogers G, Lampert E G, Boccia J. Accelerated wound healing with stapled enteric suture lines.  Ann Surg. 1985;  201 360-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Gritsman J J. Mechanical suture by soviet appartus in gastric resection: use in 4000 operations.  Surgery. 1966;  59 663-669
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Ravitch M M, Rivarola A, Grov J V. Rapid creation of gastric pouches with the use of an automatic stapling instrument?.  J Surg Res. 1966;  6 64-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Schumpelick V, Braun J. Rektumresektion mit coloanaler Anastomose. Ergebnisse der Kontinenz und Radikalität.  Chirurg. 1991;  62 25-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Smith D E, Karish A F, Chapman J P, Takaro T. Healing of the bronchial stump after pulmonary resection.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1963;  46 548-556
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Greenstein A, Rogers P, Moss G. Doubled fourth-day colorectal anastomotic strength with complete retention of intestinal mature wound collagen and accelerated deposition following immediate full enteral nutrition.  Surg Forum. 1978;  29 78-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Scott R N, Farac R P, Goodman D G, Militano T C, Geelhoed G W, Chretlem P B. The role of inflammation in bronchial stump healing.  Ann Surg. 1975;  181 381-385
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Ballantyne G H. The experimental basis of intestinal suturing. Effect of surgical technique, inflammation, and infection on enteric wound healing.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;  27 61-71
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Sacks C L. Mechanical aspects of hemostasis with surgical stapling instruments.  Ann NY Acad Sci. 1964;  115 414-417
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Hess J L, Mc Curnin D M, Riley M G, Koehler K J. Pilot study for comparison of chromic catgut suture and mechanically applied staples in enteroanastomosis.  J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1981;  17 409-414
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Chapuis P H, Pheils M T, Dunn D, Bokey E L, Newland R C, Colquhoun K. Mortality, morbidity and survival after colectomy for colon cancer.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1983;  53 223-228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Cohn I, Nance F C. Intestinal antisepsis and peritonitis from perforation. In: Sabiston DC (ed.) Textbook of Surgery. 12th Ed Saunders Philadelphia; 1981: pp. 1073-1076
    Google Scholar
  • 94 Steichen F M. Entwicklung der Maschinennaht und Vergleich mit der manuellen Naht in der Chirurgie.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1987;  372 79-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Beart jr R W, Kelly K A. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses.  Am J Surg. 1981;  141 43-147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Dziki A J, Duncan M D, Harmon J W, Saini M, Malthaner R A, Trad K S, Fernicola M T, Hakki F, Ugarte R M. Advantages of handsewn over stapled bowel anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;  34 442-448
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Penninckx F M, Kerremans R P, Geboes K J. The healing of single- and double-row stapled circular anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;  27 714-719
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Scheele J, Groitl H, Pesch H -J. Auto-Suture oder Handnaht? Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen zum Einfluß der Anastomosentechnik auf die Wundheilung am Verdauungstrakt am Beispiel des Hundekolons.  Coloproctology. 1984;  6 65-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Kozol R A, Mulligan M, Downes R J, Forouhar F A, Kreutzer D L. Early colonic anastomotic edema. Evaluation of stapled vs hand-sewn anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;  31 503-506
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Templeton J L, McKelvey S TD. Low colorectal anastomoses. An experimental assessment of two sutured and two stapled techniques.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 38-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Bubrick M P, Lundeen J W, Hitchcock C R. A comparative radiographic study of low anterior colon anastomoses in dogs.  Surgery. 1981;  89 454-459
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Dunn D H, Robbins P, Decanini C, Goldberg S, Delaney J P. A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn colonic anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1978;  21 636-639
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Koruda M J, Rollandelli R H. Experimental studies on healing of colonic anastomoses.  J Surg Res. 1990;  48 504-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Berman S, Hashizume M, Yang Y, DuPree J, Matsumoto T. Intraoperative hemostasis and wound healing in intestinal anastomoses using the ILA stapling device.  Am J Surg. 1988;  155 520-525
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Lünstedt B, Debus S, Thiede A. Anastomosenheilung bei verschiedenen Nahtverfahren im Gastrointestinaltrakt. Physiologie, experimentelle und klinische Ergebnisse.  Zentralbl Chir. 1993;  118 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Smith C R, Cokelet G R, Adams J T, Schwartz S I. Vascularity of gastrointestinal staple lines demonstrated with silicone rubber injection.  Am J Surg. 1981;  142 563-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Tuchmann A, Dinstl K, Strasser K, Armbruster C. Stapling devices in gastrointestinal surgery.  Int Surg. 1985;  70 23-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Wheeless jr C R, Smith J J. A comparison of the flow of jodine 125 through three different intestinal anastomoses: standard, gambee, and stapler.  Obstet Gynecol. 1983;  62 513-518
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Shikata J, Shida T. Experimental studies by the resin-casting method on the vascular structure of the colon following stapler anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 341-346
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Allendorf J DF, Bessler M, Kayton M L, Whelan R L, Treat M R, Nowygrod R. Tumor growth after laparotomy or laparoscopy. A preliminary study.  Surg Enodosc. 1995;  9 49-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Allgöwer M, Hasse J, Herzog B. Colonresektionen.  Chirurg. 1971;  42 1-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Böttger G. Verhütung und Behandlung von Komplikationen in der Colonchirurgie.  Chirurg. 1971;  42 10-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Deucher F, Blessing H. Resultate der abdominalen und transanalen sphinctererhaltenden Eingriffe beim Rektosigmoidkarzinom.  Schweiz Med Wschr. 1973;  103 769-775
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. I. Bursting strength of the colon after left colon resection and anastomosis.  Am J Surg. 1978;  136 587-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Bary S. von .Klinische und experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Wundheilung des Dickdarmes unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der gewebeständigen Fibrinolyse und Kollagenolyse. Habilitationsschrift Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; 1979
    Google Scholar
  • 116 Chlumsky V. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die verschiedenen Methoden der Darmvereinigung.  Bruns Beitr Klin Chir. 1899;  25 539-600
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Waninger J, Kauffmann G W, Shah I A, Farthmann E H. Influence of the distance between interrupted sutures and the tension of sutures on the healing of experimental colonic anastomoses.  Am J Surg. 1992;  163 319-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Ehrlich H P. Regulation der Wundheilung aus der Sicht des Bindegewebes.  Chirurg. 1995;  66 165-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Jonsson T h, Högström H. Diathermy-induced inflammation does not affect suture holding capacity of intestinal anastomoses.  Eur Surg Res. 1991;  23 235-239
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 Denecke H, Wirsching R. Colorectale Anastomosen.  Chirurg. 1984;  55 638-644
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Fielding L P, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G. Anastomostic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study.  Br Med J. 1980;  281 411-414
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 McArdle C S, Hole D. Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival.  Br Med J. 1991;  302 1501-1505
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Heughan C h, Grislis G, Hunt T K. The effect of anaemia on wound healing.  Ann Surg. 1974;  179 163-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Schrock T R, Deveney C W, Dunphy J E. Factors contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses.  Ann Surg. 1973;  177 513-518
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 125 Stelzner F. Operationstechnisch bedingte Mißerfolge bei der Behandlung des Kolon- und Rektumkarzinoms.  Zentralbl Chir. 1977;  102 1559-1563
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 126 Lünstedt B, Debus S, Thiede A. Standards in der Viszerosynthese.  Anastomosenheilung bei verschiedenen Nahtverfahren im Gastrointestinaltrakt - Physiologie, experimentelle und klinische Ergebnisse. In: Thiede A, Lünstedt B (Hrsg) Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona Budapest; 1994: S. 3-13
    Google Scholar
  • 127 Stephens F O, Hunt T K. Effect of changes in inspired oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions on wound tensile strength: an experimental study.  Ann Surg. 1971;  173 515-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 128 Udenfriend S. Formation of hydroxyproline in collagen.  Science. 1966;  152 1335-1340
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 129 Kivisaari J, Vihersaari T, Renvall S, Niinikoski J. Energy metabolism of experimental wounds at various oxygen environments.  Ann Surg. 1975;  181 823-828
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 130 Silver I A. Local and systemic factors which affect the proliferation of fibroblasts. In: Kulonen E, Pikkarainen J (Eds.) Biology of Fibroblast. Academic Press London; 1973: pp. 507-519
    Google Scholar
  • 131 McLachlin A D, Denton D W. Omental protection of intestinal anastomoses.  Am J Surg. 1973;  125 134-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 Cartier R, Brunette I, Hashimoto K, Bourne W M, Schaff H V. Angiogenetic factor: a possible mechanism for neovascularization produced by omental pedicles.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;  99 264-268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 133 Adams W, Ctercteko G, Bilous M. Effect of an omental wrap on the healing and vascularity of compromised intestinal anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 731-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 134 Goldsmith H S. Protection of low rectal anastomosis with intact omentum.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1977;  144 584-586
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 135 Lanter B, Mason R A. Use of omental pedicle graft to protect low anterior colonic anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1979;  22 448-451
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 136 Everett W G. Suture materials in general surgery.  Progr Surg. 1970;  8 14-37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 137 Howes E L, Sooy J W, Harvey S C. The healing of wounds as determined by their tensile strength.  JAMA. 1929;  92 42-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 138 Khoury G A, Waxman B P. Large bowel anastomoses. I. The healing process and sutured anastomoses. A review.  Br J Surg. 1983;  70 61-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 139 Kracht M, Hay J M, Fagniez P L, Fingerhut A. Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1993;  8 29-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 140 Nöthiger F, Ziegler W, Finger J, Kaufmann R. Nahtmaterial in der Darmanastomose.  Helv Chir Acta. 1980;  14 1-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 141 Winkle jr van W, Hastings J C. Considerations in the choice of suture material for various tissues.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1972;  135 113-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 142 Fontaine C J, Dudley H AF. Assessment of suture materials for intestinal use by an extramucosal inplant technique and a quantitative histological evaluation.  Br J Surg. 1978;  65 288-290
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 143 Lord M G, Broughton A C, Williams H TG. A morphologic study on the effect of suturing the submucosa of the large intestine.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;  146 211-216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 144 Nockemann P F. Die chirurgische Naht. Thieme 3. Auflage Stuttgart New York; 1980
    Google Scholar
  • 145 Edlich R F, Panek P H, Rodenheaver G T, Turnbull V G, Kurtz L D, Edgerton M T. Physical and chemical configuration of sutures in the development of surgical infection.  Ann Surg. 1973;  177 679-688
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 146 Herrmann J B. Changes in the tensile strength and knot security of surgical sutures in vivo.  Arch Surg. 1973;  106 707-710
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 147 Postlethwait R W. Long-term comparative study of nonabsorbable sutures.  Ann Surg. 1970;  171 892-
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 148 Postlethwait R W. Polyglycolic acid surgical suture.  Arch Surg. 1970;  101 489-494
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 149 Foster M E, Brennan S S, Morgan A, Leaper D J. Colonic ischaemia and anastomotic healing.  Eur Surg Res. 1985;  17 133-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 150 Magilligan jr D J, De Weese J A. Knot security and synthetic suture materials.  Am J Surg. 1974;  127 355-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 151 Trimpi H D, Khubchandani I T, Sheets J A, Stasik J J. Advances in intestinal anastomosis: Experimental study and an analysis of 984 patients.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1977;  20 107-117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 152 Hudemann H. Chirurgisches Nahtmaterial. Fischer Jena; 1959
    Google Scholar
  • 153 Deveney K E, Way L W. Effect of different absorbable sutures on healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses.  Am J Surg. 1977;  133 86-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 154 Durdey P, Bucknall T E. Assessment of sutures for use in colonic surgery: An experimental study.  J R Soc Med. 1984;  77 472-477
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 155 Hastings J C, van Winkle W, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W. Effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the stomach and the colon.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;  140 701-707
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 156 Nöthiger F. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Wertigkeit des Nahtmaterials bei der Dickdarmanastomose. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg) Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York; 1982: S. 122-127
    Google Scholar
  • 157 Riddick D H, De Grazia C T, Maenza R M. Comparison of polyglactic and polyglycolic acid sutures in reproductive tissue.  Fertility and Sterility. 1977;  28 1220-1225
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 158 Lünstedt B, Thiede A. Polydioxanon (PDS) - ein neues monofiles, synthetisches, absorbierbares Nahtmaterial. Zugfestigkeitsuntersuchungen in einem klinisch kontrollierten Versuch am Dickdarm des Menschen und physikalische Parameter im in-vitro-Test.  Chirurg. 1983;  54 103-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 159 Stephens F O, Hunt T K, Dunphy J E. Study of traditional methods of care on the tensile strength of skin wounds in rats.  Am J Surg. 1971;  122 78-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 160 Farella S, Cola B; Franchini A. Endoskopische Beurteilung der verschiedenen Heilungsstadien kolorektaler Anastomosen.  Colo-proctology. 1984;  2 86-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 161 Entner M, Heimberger H. One row anastomosis in colonic operations with antibiotic prophylaxis.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985;  161 136-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 162 Thiede A. Biologische Wertigkeit der Nahtmaterialien. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg) Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York; 1982: S.238-252
    Google Scholar
  • 163 Letwin E R. Evaluation of polyglycolic acid sutures in colonic anastomoses.  Can J Surg. 1975;  18 30-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 164 Kapadia C R, Mann J B, McGeehan D, Jose Biglin J E, Waxman B P, Dudley H AF. Behaviour of synthetic absorbable sutures with and without synergistic enteric infection.  Eur Surg Res. 1983;  15 67-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 165 Cowley L L. Wire sutures: braided or monofilament?.  Am J Surg. 1967;  113 472-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 166 Katz S, Izhar M, Mirelman D. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in the suture induced infection.  Ann Surg. 1981;  194 35-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 167 Mc Geehan D, Hunt D, Chaudhuri A, Rutter P. An experimental study of the relationship between synergistic wound sepsis and suture materials.  Br J Surg. 1980;  67 636-638
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 168 Blomstedt R, Österberg B. Fluid absorption and capillarity of suture materials.  Acta Chir Scand. 1977;  143 67-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 169 Dudley H AF, Kapadia C R. Sutures and infection: studies of conventional materials and new synthetic absorbables. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg) Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York; 1982: S. 34-38
    Google Scholar
  • 170 Eichfuss H P. Der Bauchchirurg und sein Nahtmaterial.  Med Welt. 1976;  27 562-565
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 171 Schütze U, Henningsen B, Daum R, Seufert R. Polyglycolic acid sutures for intestinal anastomoses in paediatric surgery. Experimental and first clinical findings.  Z Kinderchir. 1978;  25 76-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 172 Blomstedt B, Österberg B, Bergstrand A. Suture material and bacterial transport. An experimental study.  Acta Chir Scand. 1977;  143 71-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 173 Thiede A, Jostarndt L, Lünstedt B, Sonntag H G. Kontrollierte experimentelle histologische und mikrobiologische Untersuchungen zur Hemmwirkung von Polyglycolsäurefäden bei Infektionen.  Chirurg. 1980;  51 35-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 174 Thiede A, Jostarndt L, Lünstedt B, Sonntag H G. Zum Verhalten kontaminierter absorbierbarer Nahtmaterialien in vivo. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg) Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York; 1982: S 55-63
    Google Scholar
  • 175 Arbogast R, Gay B, Höcht B. Der Einfluß des Nahtmaterials auf die mechanische Belastbarkeit von Darmanastomosen.  Chirurg. 1978;  49 640-644
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 176 Kratzer G L. Intestinal anastomosis and abdominal wound closure using monofilament prolene polypropylene suture: report of fifty cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1978 21: 342-345
    Google Scholar
  • 177 Munday C, McGinn F P. A comparison of polyglycolic acid and catgut sutures in rat colonic anastomoses.  Br J Surg. 1976;  63 870-872
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 178 Hawley P R. Causes and prevention of colonic anastomotic breakdown.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1973;  16 272-277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 179 Hesp F LEM, Hendriks T, Lubbers E JC. de Boer HHM. Wound healing in the intestinal wall. A comparison between experimental ileal and colonic anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;  27 99-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 180 Irvin T T, Hunt T K. The effect of trauma on colonic healing.  Br J Surg. 1974;  61 430-436
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 181 Le Veen H H, Wapnick S, Falk G, Olivas O, Bhat D, Gaurdre M, Patel M. Effects of prophylactic antibiotics on colonic healing.  Am J Surg. 1976;  131 47-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 182 Schardey H M, Kamps T, Rau H G, Gatermann S, Baretton G, Schildberg F W. Bacteria: A major factor of anastomotic insufficiency following gastrectomy.  Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;  38 2564-2567
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 183 Cohn I. jr . Intestinal antisepsis.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970;  130 1006-1014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 184 Högström H, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B, Haglund U. Influence of intraperitoneal Escherichia coli with septicemia on the healing of colonic anastomoses and skin wounds.  Eur Surg Res. 1985;  17 128-132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 185 Lee J T, Ahrenholz D H, Nelson R D, Simmons R L. Mechanisms of the adjuvant effect of hemoglobin in experimental peritonitis. V. The significance of the coordinated iron component.  Surgery. 1979;  86 41-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 186 Mellish R WP, Ty T C, Keller D J. A study of intestinal healing.  J Pediatr Surg. 1968;  3 286-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 187 Canalis F, Ravitch M M. Study of healing of inverting and everting intestinal anastomoses.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968;  126 109-114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 188 Rusca J A, Bornside G H, Cohn I. Everting versus inverting gastrointestinal anastomoses: bacterial leakage and anastomotic disruption.  Ann Surg. 1969;  169 727-735
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 189 Abramowitz H B, Butcher H R. Everting and inverting intestinal anastomosis: an experimental study of comparative safety.  Am J Surg. 1971;  121 52-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 190 Hawley P R, Faulk W P, Hunt T K, Dunphy J E. Collagenase activity in the gastro-intestinal tract.  Br J Surg. 1970;  57 896-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 191 Hesp F LEM, Hendriks T, Lubbers E JC, De Boer H HM. Wound healing in the intestinal wall. Effects of infection on experimental ileal and colonic anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;  27 462-467
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 192 Irvin T T, Hunt T K. Pathogenesis and prevention of disruption of colonic anastomoses in traumatized rats.  Br J Surg. 1974;  61 437-439
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 193 Irvin T T. Collagen metabolism in infected colonic anastomoses.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;  143 220-224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 194 Morgenstern L, Yamakawa T, Ben-Shoshan M, Lippman H. Anastomotic leakage after low colonic anastomosis. Clinical and experimental aspects.  Am J Surg. 1972;  123 104-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 195 Yamakawa T, Patin C S, Sobel S, Morgenstern L. Healing of colonic anastomoses following resection for experimental „diverticulitis”.  Arch Surg. 1971;  103 17-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 196 Högström H, Haglund U. Neutropenia prevents decrease in strength of rat intestinal anastomosis: Partial effect of oxygen free radical scavengers and allopurinol.  Surgery. 1986;  99 716-720
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 197 Ohlsson K. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte collagenase. In: Woolley D, Evanson J (Eds.) Collagenase in normal and pathological connective tissue. Wiley Chichester; 1980: pp. 209-222
    Google Scholar
  • 198 Shandall A A, Williams G T, Hallett M B, Young H L. Colonic healing: a role for polymorphonuclear leucocytes and oxygen radical production.  Br J Surg. 1986;  73 225-228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 199 Starkey P H. Elastase and cathepsin G. In: Barrett AJ (Ed.) The serine proteinases of human neutrophil leucocytes and spleen. Elsevier Amsterdam; 1977: pp. 57-89
    Google Scholar
  • 200 Cronin K, Jackson D S, Dunphy J E. Changing bursting strength and collagen content of the healing colon.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968;  126 747-753
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 201 Jönsson K, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Breaking strength of small intestinal anastomoses.  Am J Surg. 1983;  145 800-803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 202 Foster M E, Johnson C D, Billings P J, Davies P W, Leaper D J. Intraoperative antegrade lavage and anastomotic healing in acute colonic obstruction.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;  29 255-259
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 203 Nagelschmidt M, Becker D, Stuttmann R, Engelhardt G H. Fibronektin-Mangel verzögert die Wundheilung bei Ratten. Langenbecks Arch (Chir Forum) 1986: 33-37
    Google Scholar
  • 204 Nagelschmidt M, Becker D, Bönninghoff N, Engelhardt G H. The effect of fibronectin therapy and fibronectin deficiency on healing of rat burns and excision wounds.  Res Exp Med. 1987;  187 217-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 205 Metzger Z, Hoffeld J T, Oppenheim J J. Suppression of fibroblast proliferation by activated macrophages: Involvement of H2O2 and a non-prostaglandin E product of the cyclooxygenase pathway.  Cell Immunol. 1986;  100 501-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 206 Phan S M, McGarry B M, Loeffler K M, Kunkel S L. Regulation of macrophage-derived fibroblast growth factor release by arachidonate metabolites.  J Leukoc Biol. 1987;  42 106-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 207 Sugarman B J, Aggarwal B B, Hass P E, Figari I S, Palladino jr M A, Shepard H M. Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-α: Effects on proliferation of normal and transformed cells in vitro.  Science. 1985;  230 943-945
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 208 Sugarman B J, Lewis G D, Eessalu T E, Aggarwal B B, Shepard H M. Effects of growth factors on the antiproliferative activity of tumor necrosis factors.  Cancer Res. 1987;  47 780-786
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 209 Ahrendt G M, Gardner K, Barbul A. Loss of colonic structural collagen impairs healing during intra-abdominal sepsis.  Arch Surg. 1994;  129 1179-1183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 210 Högström H, Bondeson L, Haglund U. Neutrophil-induced decrease in wound margin strength after intestinal anastomosis: influence on collagen and mechanisms of granulocyte action.  Eur Surg Res. 1988;  20 260-266
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 211 Jonsson T h, Högström H. Neutrophil-dependent decrease in early wound margin strength.  Arch Surg. 1991;  126 1423-1426
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 212 Nahai F, Lamb J M, Havican R G, Stone H H. Factors involved in disruption of intestinal anastomoses.  Am Surg. 1977;  43 45-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 213 Faß J. Die Wundheilungsstörung in der Chirurgie des colo-rectalen Carcinoms. Eine multifaktorielle Computeranalyse.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1985;  367 63-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 214 Giercksky K E, Danielsen S, Garberg O, Gruener O P, Holter O, Johnson J A, Nygaard K, Ofstad E, Stadaas J, Viddal K O. A single dose tinidazole and doxycycline prophylaxis in elective surgery of colon and rectum. A prospective controlled clinical multicenter study.  Ann Surg. 1982;  195 227-231
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 215 Görtz G, Häring R, Raetzel G, Rodloff A. Cephalosporine zur Infektionsprophylaxe im Rahmen der Kolonchirurgie. FAC Fortschritte d.  antimikrobiellen und antineoplastischen Chemotherapie. 1982;  1 237-245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 216 Hepp J, Käufer C. Infektionsverhütung in der Dickdarm-Chirurgie durch Cefoxitin und orthograde Darmspülung.  Krankenhausarzt. 1982;  55 885-891
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 217 Hildebrandt J, Diettrich H. Moderne mechanisch-antibiotische Vorbereitung bei kolorektalen Operationen. Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie.  Zentralbl Chir. 1985;  110 93-97
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 218 Jostarndt L, Thiede A, Sonntag H G, Hamelmann H. Die systemische Antibioticumprophylaxe in der elektiven Colonchirurgie. Ergebnisse einer kontrollierten Studie.  Chirurg. 1981;  52 398-402
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 219 Kusche J, Stahlknecht C D. Antibiotikaprophylaxe bei colorectalen Operationen. Gibt es ein Mittel der Wahl?.  Chirurg. 1981;  52 577-585
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 220 Lohr J, Wagner P K, Rothmund M. Perioperative Antibiotikaprophylaxe (Einmal- oder Mehrfachgabe) bei elektiven colorectalen Eingriffen.  Chirurg. 1984;  55 512-514
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 221 Cohen S R, Cornell C N, Collins M H, Sell J E, Blanc W A, Altman R P. Healing of ischemic colonic anastomoses in the rat: role of antibiotic preparation.  Surgery. 1985;  97 443-446
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 222 Schardey H M, Kamps T, Rau H G, Baretton G, Gatermann S, Exner H, Schildberg F W. Can oesophago-intestinal anastomotic leakage develop in the complete absence of bacteria? A comparison of normal and germ-free rats.  Int J Surg Science. 1997;  4 9-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 223 Schardey H M, Joosten U, Finke U, Staubach K H, Schauer R, Heiss A, Kooistra A, Rau H G, Nibler R, Lüdeling S, Unertl K. Ruckdeschel G, Exner, H, Schildberg FW. The prevention of anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy with local decontamination.  Ann Surg. 1997;  225 172-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 224 Schardey H M, Krämling H J, Cramer C, Kusenack U, Hadersbeck J, Schildberg F W. Risikofaktoren und pathogene Mikroorganismen bei Patienten mit insuffizienter Ösophago-Jejunostomie nach Gastrektomie.  Zentralblatt Chir. 1998;  123 46-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 225 Curley S A, Allison D C, Smith D E, Doberneck R C. Analysis of techniques and results in 347 consecutive colon anastomoses.  Am J Surg. 1988;  155 597-601
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 226 Rolandelli R H, Koruda M J, Settle R G, Rombeau J L. The effect of enteral feedings supplemented with pectin on the healing of colonic anastomoses in the rat.  Surgery. 1986;  99 703-707
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 227 Rolandelli R H, Koruda M J, Settle R G, Rombeau J L. Effects of intraluminal infusion of short-chain fatty acids on the healing of colonic anastomosis in the rat.  Surgery. 1986;  100 198-204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 228 Blomquist P, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Effect of diverting colostomy on collagen metabolism in the colonic wall. Studies in the rat.  Am J Surg. 1985;  149 330-333
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 229 Blomquist P, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Effect of diverting colostomy on breaking strength of anastomoses after resection of the left side of the colon. Studies in the rat.  Am J Surg. 1985;  149 712-715
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 230 Udén P, Blomquist P, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Influence of proximal colostomy on the healing of a left colon anastomosis: an experimental study in the rat.  Br J Surg. 1988;  75 325-329
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 231 Wara P, Sorensen K, Berg V. Proximal fecal diversion: review of ten years’ experience.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1981;  24 114-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 232 Blomquist P, Ahonen J, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. The effect of relative bowel rest on healing of colonic anastomoses. Collagen synthesis and content in the colonic wall after left colon resection and anastomosis in the rat.  Acta Chir Scand. 1984;  150 677-681
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 233 Blomquist P, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. The effect of relative bowel rest on healing of colonic anastomoses. Breaking strength and collagen in the colonic wall following left colon resection and anastomosis in the rat.  Acta Chir Scand. 1984;  150 671-675
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 234 Högström H, Haglund U, Zederfeldt B. Beneficial effect of proteinase inhibitors on early breaking strength of intestinal anastomoses.  Acta Chir Scand. 1985;  151 529-532
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 235 Young H L, Wheeler M H. Results of a prospective randomized doubleblind trial of aprotinin in colonic surgery.  World J Surg. 1984;  8 367-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 236 Hawley P R, Page Faulk W. A circulatory collagenase inhibitor.  Br J Surg. 1970;  57 900-904
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 237 Högström H, Haglund U. Postoperative decrease in suture holding capacity in laparotomy wounds and anastomoses.  Acta Chir Scand. 1985;  151 533-535
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 238 Jönsson K, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Collagen metabolism in small intestinal anastomosis.  Am J Surg. 1987;  154 288-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 239 Bary S v on, Kortmann H, Köpcke W. Berstungsdrücke des enterotomierten Rattencolons unter Proteinaseinhibition.  Res Exp Med. 1976;  168 123-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 240 Delaney P, Lalor D. Enzyme inhibition in colorectal surgery.  Br J Surg. 1976;  63 23-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 241 Young H L, Wheeler M H. Collagenase inhibition in the healing colon.  J R Soc Med. 1983;  76 32-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 242 Virca G D, Metz G, Schnebli H P. Similarities between human and rat leukocyte elastase and cathepsin G.  Eur J Biochem. 1984;  144 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 243 Fritz H, Wunderer G. Biochemistry and applications of aprotinin, the kallikrein inhibitor from bovine organs. Arzneim.  Forschung / Drug Res. 1983;  33 479-494
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 244 Högström H, Haglund U, Zederfeldt B. Beneficial effect on intestinal anastomoses of S-2441, a synthetic kallikrein-kinin antagonist. Experimental studies in the rat.  Am J Surg. 1985;  150 312-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 245 Ryan G B, Majno G. Acute Inflammation.  Am J Pathol. 1977;  86 183-276
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 246 Högström H, Haglund U. Early decrease in suture line breaking strength. The effect of proposed collagenase inhibition.  Res Exp Med. 1985;  185 451-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 247 Stewart R. Influence of malignant cells on the healing of colonic anastomoses: experimental observations.  Proc Roy Soc Med. 1973;  66 1089-1091
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 248 Hawley P R. Cancer of the colon and rectum: Collagenase activity in patients who have rectal carcinoma.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1976;  19 9-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 249 Albertson S, Hummel III R P, Breeden M, Greenhalgh D G. PDGF and FGF reverse the healing impairment in protein-malnourished diabetic mice.  Surgery. 1993;  114 368-373
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 250 Beickert R, von Imhoff C. Nahtinsuffizienz am Dickdarm: Ist der Operateur ein Risikofaktor?.  Chirurg. 1984;  55 645-649
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 251 Brennan S S, Pickford I R, Evans M, Pollock A V. Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses. A controlled clinical trial.  Br J Surg. 1982;  69 722-724
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 252 Gilmour D G, Aitkenhead A R, Hothersall A P, Mc A. Ledingham I. The effect of hypovolaemia on colonic blood flow in the dog.  Br J Surg. 1980;  67 82-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 253 Irvin T T, Goligher J C. Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses.  Br J Surg. 1973;  60 461-464
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 254 Kühlmayer R, Doberauer B. Die letale Nahtdehiszenz als Risikofaktor der Kolon-Rektumchirurgie.  Wien Med Wschr. 1981;  131 395-399
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 255 Stelzner F. Vorbeugung der intraperitonealen Nahtinsuffizienz (Dünn- und Dickdarm).  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1982;  358 259-263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 256 Wayand W, Rieger R, Umlauft M. Ein- oder zweireihig? Eine kontrollierte prospektive Studie zum Vergleich zweier Nahttechniken bei gastrointestinalen Anastomosen.  Chirurg. 1984;  55 650-652
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 257 Athanasiadis S, Girona J, Gandji D, Lutfi T. Die Bedeutung der Nahttechnik in der Darmchirurgie. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg) Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York; 1982: S. 199-207
    Google Scholar
  • 258 Beickert R, von Imhoff C. Nahtinsuffizienz am Dickdarm: Ist der Operateur ein Risikofaktor?.  Chirurg. 1984;  55 645-649
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 259 Eichfuss H P, Knipper A. Wundheilung am Darm bei akuter und chronischer Peritonitis. In: Häring R (Hrsg) Peritonitis. TM Bad Oeynhausen; 1979: S 154-157
    Google Scholar
  • 260 Merkle P. Entero-enterale Anastomosen.  Chirurg. 1984;  55 632-637
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 261 Meyer G, Lange V, Oevermann E, Schildberg F W. Notfallchirurgie beim kolorektalen Karzinom: Risikofaktoren, onkologischer Stellenwert und therapeutische Möglichkeiten. In: Hollender LF, De Manzini N (Eds) Chirurgie d’urgence. Tome I 1990: pp 413-415
    Google Scholar
  • 262 Slavin J, Nash J R, Kingsnorth A N. Effect of transforming growth factor beta and basic fibroblast growth factor on steroid-impaired healing intestinal wounds.  Br J Surg. 1992;  79 69-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 263 Wilker D, Sklarek J, Waldner H, Izbicki J R, Siebeck M. Untersuchung zur Frühphase der Anastomosenheilung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Peritonitis und Ischämie.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1988;  373 217-221
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 264 Christensen H, Oxlund H, Laurberg S. Postoperative biosynthetic human growth hormone increases the strength and collagen deposition of experimental colonic anastomoses.  Int J Colorect Dis. 1991;  6 133-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 265 Goodman L, Stein G H. Basal and induced amounts of interleukin-6 mRNA decline progressively with age in human fibroblasts.  J Biol Chem. 1994;  269 19 250-19 255
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 266 Hamon G A, Hunt T K, Spencer E M. In vivo effects of systemic insulin-like growth factor-I alone and compleated with insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 on corticosteroid suppressed wounds.  Growth Regul. 1993;  3 53-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 267 Kingsnorth A N, Vowles R, Nash J RG. Epidermal growth factor increases tensile strength in intestinal wounds in pigs.  Br J Surg. 1990;  77 409-412
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 268 Watson R WG, Redmond H P, Mc Carthy J, Burke P E, Bouchier-Hayes D. Exposure of the peritoneal cavity to air regulates early inflammatory responses to surgery in a murine model.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 1060-1065
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 269 Hofstädter F. Pathologie der Wundheilung.  Chirurg. 1995;  66 174-181
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 270 Zederfeldt B. Anastomotic Healing. In: Eigler FW, Gross E, Vogt E (Hrsg) Die Anastomose am Gatrointestinaltrakt. TM Hameln; 1990: S 13-16
    Google Scholar
  • 271 Meßmer K, Wanner K, Reulen H J. Durchblutungsverhalten abdomineller Organe nach Endotoxininjektion beim Hund.  Z Ges Exp Med. 1968;  146 292-308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 272 Leder L D. Wundheilung und Fremdkörperreaktion. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg) Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York; 1982: S226-228
    Google Scholar
  • 273 Lindner J. Morphologie und Biochemie der Wundheilung.  Langenbecks Arch Chir (Kongreßbericht 1982). 1982;  358 153-160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 274 Schäfer K, Stanka H, Ernst R, Zumtobel V. Ausdehnung und Bedeutung von Mikrozirkulationsstörungen für die Pathogenese der Nahtinsuffizienz bei Colonanastomosen. In: Eigler FW, Gross E, Vogt E (Hrsg) Die Anastomose am Gastrointestinaltrakt. TM Hameln; 1990: S 39-47
    Google Scholar
  • 275 Graham M F, Drucker D EM, Diegelmann R F, Elson C O. Collagen synthesis by human intestinal smooth muscle cells in culture.  Gastroenterology. 1987;  92 400-405
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 276 Peterkofsky B. Ascorbate requirement for hydroxylation and secretion of procollagen: relationship to inhibition of collagen synthesis in scurvy.  Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;  54 1135S-1140S
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 277 Bark S, Rettura G, Goldman D, Seifter E, Levenson S, Demetriou A A. Effect of supplemental vitamin A on the healing of colon anastomosis.  J Surg Res.. 1984;  36 470-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 278 Winsey K, Simon R J, Levenson S M, Seifter E, Demetriou A A. Effect of supplemental vitamin A on colon anastomotic healing in rats given preoperative irradiation.  Am J Surg. 1987;  153 153-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 279 Daly J M, Vars H M, Dudrick S J. Effects of protein depletion on strength of colonic anastomoses.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1972;  134 15-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 280 Preshaw R M, Attisha R P, Hollingsworth W J, Todd J D. Randomized sequential trial of parenteral nutrition in healing of colonic anastomoses in man.  Can J Surg. 1979;  22 437-439
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 281 Rahmat A, Norman J N, Smith G. The effect of zinc deficiency on wound healing.  Br J Surg. 1974;  61 271-273
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 282 Jochum M, Witte J, Schiessler H, Selbmann H K, Ruckdeschl G, Fritz H. Clotting and other plasma factors in experimental endotoxemia: inhibition of degradation by exogenous proteinase inhibitors.  Eur Surg Res. 1981;  13 152-168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 283 Müller-Berghaus G. Pathophysiology of generalized intravascular coagulation.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 1977;  3 209-246
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 284 Greuer W, Hee E, Klein-Buchholz F, Marggraf G, Quadripur S, Stankovic P, Weber H G, Wilde G. Spontane periphere Proteolyse. 1. Mitteilung: Methodik und klinische Untersuchungsergebnisse.  Surg Res. 1976;  26 89-103
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 285 Haverkate F, Brakman P. Fibrin plate essay.  Progr Chem Fibrinol Thrombol. 1975;  1 151-162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 286 Rotstein D, Pruett T L, Simmons R L. Fibrin in peritonitis.  Ann Surg. 1986;  203 413-419
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 287 Högström H, Claeson G, Larsson-Backström C, Lundberg D, Wenngren E, Haglund U. Septic shock in the rat: Activation of plasma proteolytic systems and effects of a kallikrein inhibitor/bradykinin antagonist (S-2441).  Acta Chir Scand. 1987;  153 161-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 288 Tagart R EB. Colorectal anastomosis: factors influencing success.  J R Soc Med. 1981;  74 111-118
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 289 Scheele J, Husemann B, Pesch H J. Kolonanastomosen im Tierexperiment. Mechanische und morphologische Befunde.  Z Exp Chir. 1978;  11 110-120
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 290 Lee E. The effect of obstructive jaundice on the migration of reticulo-endothelial cells and fibroblasts into early experimental granulomata.  Br J Surg. 1972;  59 875-877
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 291 Than T, McGee J O’D, Sokhi G S, Patrick R S, Blumgart L H. Skin prolyl hydroxylase in patients with obstructive jaundice.  Lancet. 1974;  2 807-808
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

PD Dr. G. Meyer

Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik
Klinikum Großhadern

Marchioninistr. 15

81377 München

Telefon: 089 - 7095 - 3570

Fax: 089 - 7095 - 8894

eMail: meyerg@gch.med.uni-muenchen.de

      >