Digital Neurorrhaphy after the Age of 60 Years

ABSTRACT

Fifteen patients over the age of 60 years (average age: 65 years), with 19 digital nerve lacerations, were evaluated more than 1 year after injury. Two-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein evaluation, and subjective return of sensibility were examined by a certified hand therapist before and after local anesthetic block of the uninjured digital nerve. Sixty-three percent of the patients regained moving two-point discrimination less than 15 mm; 100 percent regained Semmes-Weinstein values of less than 4.56; and 84 percent of the patients subjectively noted greater than half of their normal sensation. Crossover innervation was a factor in four of 14 repairs. Based on the data, useful sensation can be regained by repairing a digital nerve in the majority of patients older than 60 years of age.

REFERENCES

• 1 Gould J S. Digital nerves. In: Gelberman RH (ed): Operative Nerve Repair and Reconstruction Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1991
• 2 Wang W Z, Crain G M, Baylis W, Tsai T M. Outcome of digital nerve injuries in adults.  J Hand Surg . 1996;  21A 138
• 3 Poppen N K, McCarroll H R, Doyle J R, Niebauer J J. Recovery of sensibility after suture of digital nerves.  J Hand Surg . 1979;  3B 212
• 4 Altissimi M, Mancini G B, Azzara A. Results of primary repair of digital nerves.  J Hand Surg . 1991;  16B 546
• 5 Efstathopopolous D, Gerostathopoulos N, Misitzis D. Clinical assessment of primary digital nerve repair.  Acta Orthop Scad . 1995;  66 45
• 6 Wallace W A. The damaged digital nerve.  Hand . 1975;  7 139
• 7 Young L, Wray R C, Weeks P M. A randomized prospective comparison of fascicular and epineurial digital nerve repairs.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1981;  68 89
• 8 Honner R, Fragiadakis E G, Lamb D W. An investigation of the factors affecting the result of digital nerve division.  Hand . 1960;  2 1
• 9 Almquist E, Eeg-Olofsson O. Sensory-nerve-conduction velocity and two-point discrimination in sutured nerves.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1970;  52A 791
• 10 Buncke H J. Digital nerve repairs.  Surg Clin North America . 1972;  52 1267
• 11 Vertruyen M F, Burgeon M A, Dachy B S, Ley R E. Sensory recovery after microsurgical repair of digital nerves.  Acta Chir Belg . 1994;  94 325
• 12 Al-Ghazal S K, McKiernan M, McCann J. Results of clinical assessment after primary digital nerve repair.  J Hand Surg . 1994;  19B 255
• 13 Steinberg D R, Koman L A. Factors Affecting the Results of Peripheral Nerve Repair and Reconstruction.  Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1991
• 14 Sullivan D J. Results of digital neurorrhaphy in adults.  J Hand Surg . 1985;  10B 41
• 15 Dellon A L. The moving two-point discrimination test: clinical evaluation of the quickly adapting fiber/receptor system.  J Hand Surg . 1978;  3A 474
• 16 Levin S, Pearsall G, Ruderman R J. Von Frey's method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: an engineering analysis of the Weinstein-Semmes pressure aesthesiometer.  J Hand Surg . 1978;  3 211
• 17 Strauch B, Lang A, Ferder M. The ten test.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1997;  99 1074
• 18 Brushart T B. In: Green's Operative Hand Surgery, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingston 1999
• 19 Mailander P, Berger A, Schaller E, Ruhe K. Results of primary nerve repair in the upper extremity.  Microsurgery . 1989;  10 147
• 20 Calder J S, McAllister M R. Interpreting the results of unilateral digital nerve repair.  J Hand Surg . 1993;  18B 797
• 21 Chow S P, Ng C. Can a divided digital nerve of one side of the finger be left unrepaired?.  J Hand Surg . 1993;  18B 629
• 22 Tadjalli H E, McIntyre F H, Dolynchuk K N, Murray K A. Importance of crossover innervation in digital nerve repair demonstrated by nerve isolation technique.  Ann Plast Surg . 1995;  35 32