Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-12695
Digital Neurorrhaphy after the Age of 60 Years
Publication History
Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jrm/200102/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-2001-12695-1.jpg)
ABSTRACT
Fifteen patients over the age of 60 years (average age: 65 years), with 19 digital nerve lacerations, were evaluated more than 1 year after injury. Two-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein evaluation, and subjective return of sensibility were examined by a certified hand therapist before and after local anesthetic block of the uninjured digital nerve. Sixty-three percent of the patients regained moving two-point discrimination less than 15 mm; 100 percent regained Semmes-Weinstein values of less than 4.56; and 84 percent of the patients subjectively noted greater than half of their normal sensation. Crossover innervation was a factor in four of 14 repairs. Based on the data, useful sensation can be regained by repairing a digital nerve in the majority of patients older than 60 years of age.
REFERENCES
- 1 Gould J S. Digital nerves. In: Gelberman RH (ed): Operative Nerve Repair and Reconstruction Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1991
- 2 Wang W Z, Crain G M, Baylis W, Tsai T M. Outcome of digital nerve injuries in adults. J Hand Surg . 1996; 21A 138
- 3 Poppen N K, McCarroll H R, Doyle J R, Niebauer J J. Recovery of sensibility after suture of digital nerves. J Hand Surg . 1979; 3B 212
- 4 Altissimi M, Mancini G B, Azzara A. Results of primary repair of digital nerves. J Hand Surg . 1991; 16B 546
- 5 Efstathopopolous D, Gerostathopoulos N, Misitzis D. Clinical assessment of primary digital nerve repair. Acta Orthop Scad . 1995; 66 45
- 6 Wallace W A. The damaged digital nerve. Hand . 1975; 7 139
- 7 Young L, Wray R C, Weeks P M. A randomized prospective comparison of fascicular and epineurial digital nerve repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1981; 68 89
- 8 Honner R, Fragiadakis E G, Lamb D W. An investigation of the factors affecting the result of digital nerve division. Hand . 1960; 2 1
- 9 Almquist E, Eeg-Olofsson O. Sensory-nerve-conduction velocity and two-point discrimination in sutured nerves. J Bone Joint Surg . 1970; 52A 791
- 10 Buncke H J. Digital nerve repairs. Surg Clin North America . 1972; 52 1267
- 11 Vertruyen M F, Burgeon M A, Dachy B S, Ley R E. Sensory recovery after microsurgical repair of digital nerves. Acta Chir Belg . 1994; 94 325
- 12 Al-Ghazal S K, McKiernan M, McCann J. Results of clinical assessment after primary digital nerve repair. J Hand Surg . 1994; 19B 255
- 13 Steinberg D R, Koman L A. Factors Affecting the Results of Peripheral Nerve Repair and Reconstruction. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1991
- 14 Sullivan D J. Results of digital neurorrhaphy in adults. J Hand Surg . 1985; 10B 41
- 15 Dellon A L. The moving two-point discrimination test: clinical evaluation of the quickly adapting fiber/receptor system. J Hand Surg . 1978; 3A 474
- 16 Levin S, Pearsall G, Ruderman R J. Von Frey's method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: an engineering analysis of the Weinstein-Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J Hand Surg . 1978; 3 211
- 17 Strauch B, Lang A, Ferder M. The ten test. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1997; 99 1074
-
18 Brushart T B. In: Green's Operative Hand Surgery, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingston 1999
- 19 Mailander P, Berger A, Schaller E, Ruhe K. Results of primary nerve repair in the upper extremity. Microsurgery . 1989; 10 147
- 20 Calder J S, McAllister M R. Interpreting the results of unilateral digital nerve repair. J Hand Surg . 1993; 18B 797
- 21 Chow S P, Ng C. Can a divided digital nerve of one side of the finger be left unrepaired?. J Hand Surg . 1993; 18B 629
- 22 Tadjalli H E, McIntyre F H, Dolynchuk K N, Murray K A. Importance of crossover innervation in digital nerve repair demonstrated by nerve isolation technique. Ann Plast Surg . 1995; 35 32