Prospective Evaluation of 3 Risk Stratification Scores in Cardiac Surgery[1]

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate 3 different risk stratification scores in cardiac surgery, based on the hospital results of 1299 patients. Methods: From June 1995 to December 1997, all patients (n = 1299) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or heart valve surgery were prospectively enrolled. The postoperative in-hospital outcome (mortality, morbidity and length of hospital stay) was analysed in relation to three different risk stratification scores (Parsonnet, Higgins and French score). Results: The results of 1299 patients (mean age 62.8 ± 10.2 years) were analysed. 10 patients died, accounting for a total mortality of 0.8 %. 13 patients (1 %) underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In 25 patients (1.9 %), perioperative myocardial infarction occurred. Performance of the 3 systems was assessed by evaluating discrimination with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the ROC curve was 0.761 for Parsonnet, 0.786 for Higgins and 0.798 for French score. The French and the Higgins score showed an increase of in-hospital mortality, morbidity and length of stay in relation to increasing risk classes. Conclusion: For objective evaluation of the outcome in cardiac surgery, case-mix severity needs to be considered, which is refIected by preoperative risk stratification scores. In our study, all the 3 scores showed a high discrimination and are appropriate tools to assess mortality in cardiac surgery. Especially the French and the Higgins score (restricted to 5 groups), due to their simplicity, were useful to predict postoperative outcome in clinical routine.

Key words:

Cardiac surgery - - Risk stratification - - Outcome

1 Oral presentation at the Symposium on Risk Stratification in Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery in Cologne (Germany), 15^th to 16^th of October 1999.

References

• 1 Berwick D M. Continuous improvement as an ideal Health Care.  N Engl J Med.. 1989;  320 (1) 53-6
• 2 Chassin M R, Hannan E L, De Buono B A. Benefits and hazard of reporting medical outcomes publicty.  N Engl J Med.. 1996;  334 394-8
• 3 Donabedian A. The Quality of Care. How can it be assessed?.  JAMA. 1988;  260 1743-8
• 4 Ruef C. Qualitätssicherung - eine neue Aufgabe für Schweizer Spitäler?.  Schweizerische Aerztezeitung.. 1995;  76 1747-55
• 5 Nollert G, Reichart B. Qualitätssicherung in der Kardiochirurgie: Allgemeine und eigene Konzepte.  Herz.. 1996;  21 383-8
• 6 Martinez-Alario J, Tuesta I D, Plasencia E, Santana M, Mora M L. Mortality prediction in cardiac surgery patients: Comparative performance of Parsonnet and general severity systems.  Circulation.. 1999;  99 2378-82
• 7 Nashef S AM, Roques F, Michel P. et al . European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE).  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.. 1999;  16 9-13
• 8 Parsonnet V, Dean D, Bernstein A D. A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease.  Circulation.. 1989;  79 (Suppl. I) I-3-12
• 9 Higgins T L, Estafanous F G, Loop F D. et al . Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. A clinical severity score.  JAMA.. 1992;  267 2344-8
• 10 Roques F, Gabrielle F, Michel P. et al . Quality of care in adult heart surgery: proposal for a self-assessment approach based on a French multicenter study.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.. 1995;  9 433-40
• 11 Favaloro R G. Critical Analysis of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A 30 year journey.  J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1998;  No. 4 (Suppl. B) 1B-63B
• 12 Pocock S J, Henderson R A, Rickards A F. et al . Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery.  The Lancet.. 1995;  346 1184-9
• 13 The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators . Comparison of Coronary Bypass Surgery with Angioplasty in Patients with Multivessel Disease.  N Engl J Med.. 1996;  335 217-25
• 14 Estafanous F G, Loop F D, Higgins T L. et al . Increased and decreased morbidity of coronary artery bypass grafting between 1986 and 1994.  Ann Thorac Surg.. 1998;  65 (2) 383-9
• 15 Disch D L, O'Connor G T, Birkmeyer J D. et al . Changes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: 1987 - 1990. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.  Ann Thorac Surg.. 1994;  57 416-23
• 16 Naunheim K S, Fiore A C, Wadley J J. et al . The dranging profile of the patient undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.  J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1988;  11 494-8
• 17 Jones E L, Weintraub W S, Craver J M. et al . Coronary bypass surgery: is the operation different today?.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.. 1991;  101 108-15
• 18 Estafanous F G, Koch C G. Anesthesia for coronary artery surgery: current issues.  Ann Cardiac Surg.. 1994;  7 104-16
• 19 Loop F D. A 20-year experience in coronary artery reoperation.  Eur Heart J.. 1989;  10 (Suppl. H) 78-84
• 20 Kurki T SO, Kataja M. Preoperative prediction of postoperative morbidity in coronary artery bypass grafting.  Ann Thorac Surg.. 1996;  61 1740-5
• 21 Grover F L, Hammermesiter K E, Shroyer A L. Quality initiatives and the power of the database. What they are and how they run.  Ann Thorac Surg.. 1995;  60 1514-21
• 22 Jones R H, Hannan E L, Hammermeister K E. et al . Identification of preoperative variables needed for risk adjustement of short-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.  J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1996;  28 1478-87
• 23 Pinna-Pintor P, Bobbio M, Sandrelli L. et al . Risk stratification for open heart operations: Comparison of centers regardless of the influence of the surgical team.  Ann Thorac Surg.. 1997;  64 410-3
• 24 Goerre S. Herzeingriffe in der Schweiz 1995.  Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. . 1997;  86 (11) 425-31
• 25 Unger F. Open heart surgery in Europe 1993.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.. 1996;  10 120-8

1 Oral presentation at the Symposium on Risk Stratification in Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery in Cologne (Germany), 15^th to 16^th of October 1999.