Synlett 1999; 1999(2): 267
DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-5991
synlett spotlight
© Georg Thieme Verlag, Rüdigerstr. 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany. All rights reserved. This journal, including all individual contributions and illustrations published therein, is legally protected by copyright for the duration of the copyright period. Any use, exploitation or commercialization outside the narrow limits set by copyright legislation, without the publisher's consent, is illegal and liable to criminal prosecution. This applies in particular to photostat reproduction, copying, cyclostyling, mimeographing or duplication of any kind, translating, preparation of microfilms, and electronic data processing and storage.

Spotlight 2, Metathesis. The Schrock and Grubbs Catalysts

Brian A. Chauder*
  • *Department of Chemistry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 1999 (online)

A cursory glance at the current synthetic literature attests to the explosion in the application of metathesis. The ring-closure metathesis (RCM) is the most widely used concept and the Grubbs ruthenium alkylidenes 1 and 2 and the Schrock molybdenum alkylidene 3 are the exclusive catalysts. All three catalysts are reactive with a diverse range of substrates, are tolerant of many functional groups (e.g. ROH, RCOR, RCHO, RCONR2) and are effective in RCMs from simple 5-, 6-, 7-membered to 17-membered carbo-and hetero-cyclic arrays. Although the Schrock catalyst is the most reactive, it has a narrower functional group tolerance (e.g. incompatible with ROH and RCO2H groups). In a further contrast, the Schrock catalyst promotes RCM of di-, tri- and even tetra-substituted alkenes whereas the Grubbs catalysta are successful for only disubstituted alkenes (Ene-yne RCm is an exception). Typcial RCM conditions are high dilution (10-50 mM) and slow substrate addition, especially when competitive polymerization is observed.

    >