Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1814145
Incremental Value of Digital PET/MRI over PET/CT in the Assessment of Neoplastic Liver Lesions
Authors
Abstract
Objectives
The objective of this study was to assess the performance of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) compared with PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the clinical management of patients with neoplastic hepatic lesions.
Materials and Methods
This is a retrospective study and includes a sample size of 15 patients, referred for diagnostic evaluation and staging of neoplastic hepatic lesions. The patients included in this study underwent a simultaneous PET/CT scan on uMI-Vista and a complementary liver PET/MRI scan on uPMR 790. PET/CT and PET/MRI were compared based on the number of detected lesions, the smallest detected lesion diameter, and tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR). The histopathological analysis was considered the standard of reference.
Results
PET/MRI reported extra information in 87% (13/15) of patients, and additional lesions were identified in 73% (11/15) of patients. Furthermore, PET/MRI could identify subcentimeter liver lesions and added great value in the evaluation of lesion viability. Overall, 40 additional lesions were detected with PET/MRI in contrast with PET/CT within the given patient cohort. The smallest revealed lesion measured 2 mm in the long-axis diameter, and the average long-axis diameter of small lesions detected by PET/MRI across 15 patients was 3.4 mm with a standard deviation of 1.3 mm. These findings significantly affected the final outcomes in 12 out of 15 patients, leading to modifications in the response assessment category in 5 patients and defined the malignant hepatic lesions on staging/restaging scans (10/15).
Discussion
PET/MRI has been found to outperform PET/CT in terms of conspicuity of liver lesions, with better sensitivity and specificity. Overall, coregistered PET and MR images have been shown to outperform PET/CT in the imaging of liver lesions, with better delineation of small lesions as well as reliable localization of lesions to the corresponding liver segment.
Conclusion
In addition to a significant decrease in radiation exposure, the PET/MRI combination resulted in higher detection rates and more precise characterization of small malignant liver lesions and tends to be more powerful than PET/CT, which has a direct impact on the patient's diagnosis, staging, and further therapeutic strategies.
Keywords
PET/MRI - liver lesions - molecular imaging - multimodality scanning - neoplastic hepatic lesions - PET/CTAuthors' Contributions
All authors contributed to the study's conception and design, as well as to material preparation, data collection, and analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
IRB Approval
The study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board, Omega Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study, or the requirement for written consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Ethical Standards
All procedures involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (revised in 2013) and its subsequent amendments.
Declaration of GenAI Use
During the preparation of this article, the authors used ChatGPT to support the writing of the introduction section. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the final version of the publication.
Publication History
Article published online:
18 December 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M, Warren RS, Thoeni RF. Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 2002; 224 (03) 748-756
- 2 Kim SH, Kim SH, Lee J, Kim MJ, Jeon YH, Park Y. et al. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 1675-1681
- 3 Schwenzer NF, Pfannenberg C, Reimold M. et al. Imaging of oncologic patients using PET/MRI: prospects and challenges. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81 (03) 508-516
- 4 Antoch G, Stattaus J, Nemat AT. et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative staging. Radiology 2003; 229 (02) 526-533
- 5 Veit P, Antoch G, Stergar H. et al. Detection of liver metastases using FDG PET: comparison of PET with PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 33 (02) 167-179
- 6 Jadvar H, Colletti PM. Competitive advantage of PET/MRI. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83 (01) 84-94
- 7 Donati OF, Hany TF, Reiner CS. et al. Value of retrospective fusion of PET and MR images in detection and characterization of hepatic metastases: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 40 (09) 1370-1380
- 8 Lee DH, Lee JM, Baek JH. et al. Diagnostic performance of integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI for detection and characterization of malignant liver lesions: comparison with PET/CT and gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 44 (02) 475-485
- 9 Ehman EC, Johnson GB, Villanueva-Meyer JE. et al. PET/MRI: where might it replace PET/CT?. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 46 (05) 1247-1262
- 10 Ishii S, Shimao D, Hara T. et al. Comparison of integrated whole-body PET/MR and PET/CT: is PET/MR alternative to PET/CT in routine clinical oncology?. Ann Nucl Med 2016; 30 (03) 225-233
- 11 Beiderwellen K, Grueneisen J, Ruhlmann V. et al. 18F-FDG PET/MRI vs PET/CT for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85 (02) 459-465
- 12 Zhou N, Meng X, Zhang Y. et al. Diagnostic value of delayed PET/MR in liver metastasis in comparison with PET/CT. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 717687
- 13 Hussain D, Abbas N, Khan J. Recent breakthroughs in PET-CT multimodality imaging: innovations and clinical impact. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11 (12) 1213
- 14 Szyszko TA, Cook GJR. PET/CT and PET/MRI in head and neck malignancy. Clin Radiol 2018; 73 (01) 60-69
- 15 Tan GJ, Berlangieri SU, Lee ST, Scott AM. FDG PET/CT in the liver: lesions mimicking malignancies. Abdom Imaging 2014; 39 (01) 187-195

