Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809943
The Relationship between the Frontal Branch of the Superficial Temporal Artery and the Temporal Hairline in Bicoronal Incisions: Cadaveric and Clinical Study
Authors
Abstract
Introduction
Classic bicoronal skin incisions for bifrontal craniotomy are usually performed near the course of the superficial temporal artery (STA). This frequently results in injuries to the frontal branch (fSTA) or even the STA's main trunk. We investigate the usual course of the fSTA and evaluate a previously proposed modification to bicoronal scalp incisions for its rate of STA preservation.
Materials and Methods
Sixteen sides of cadaveric heads were dissected. We investigated the location of the fSTA in relation to the temporal peak of the hairline. We also performed a retrospective study of 19 patients with cerebral aneurysms who underwent microsurgery using the modified bicoronal incision. The patients were treated at our facility between June 2017 and Jan 2022. Patients' data were retrospectively reviewed and evaluated for postoperative STA preservation.
Results
The majority of fSTAs (68.75%) passed through and just anterior to the temporal peak. The average distances between the fSTA and the temporal peak from the anterior and posterior aspects were 0.44 (0.2–0.7) cm and 0.52 (0.3–0.8) cm. The mean distance between the STA bifurcation and the zygomatic root was 3 cm. Using the modified bicoronal scalp incision, the right fSTA of 14/19 (73.7%) patients and the left fSTA of 16/19 (84.2%) patients were preserved in the scalp flap.
Conclusion
The most anterior part of the fSTA was located very close to the temporal peak of the hairline. The modified bicoronal skin incision for bifrontal craniotomy and modified transbasal craniotomy was an effective means of STA preservation.
Keywords
bicoronal incision - modified bicoronal incision - frontal branch of STA - hairline - superficial temporal artery - temporal peakPublication History
Article published online:
26 June 2025
© 2025. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Hartley F, Kenyon JH. Experiences in cerebral surgery. Ann Surg 1907; 45 (04) 481-530
- 2 Kadakia S, Badhey A, Ashai S, Lee TS, Ducic Y. Alopecia following bicoronal incisions. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (03) 220-224
- 3 Munro IR, Fearon JA. The coronal incision revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (01) 185-187
- 4 Kerawala CJ, Grime RJ, Stassen LF, Perry M. The bicoronal flap (craniofacial access): an audit of morbidity and a proposed surgical modification in male pattern baldness. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 38 (05) 441-444
- 5 Farooq G, Rehman L, Bokhari I, Rizvi SRH. Modern microsurgical resection of olfactory groove meningiomas by classical bicoronal subfrontal approach without orbital osteotomies. Asian J Neurosurg 2018; 13 (02) 258-263
- 6 Hu CY, Wu CT, Chen CC, Fu CH. Bicoronal incision and frontal-basal approach for removal of sinonasal fibrous dysplasia complicated by orbital subperiosteal abscess. World Neurosurg 2020; 143: 389-391
- 7 Uemura T, Kawano H, Watanabe H, Kikuchi M. Multiple peripheral osteomas related to frontal exposure by bicoronal incision. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (03) 733-734
- 8 Atlan G, Jammet P, Schmitt-Bernard CF, Dupoirieux L, Souyris F. Bicoronal incision for nasal bone grafting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 23 (01) 2-5
- 9 Liu JK, Christiano LD, Gupta G, Carmel PW. Surgical nuances for removal of retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas via the transbasal subfrontal translamina terminalis approach. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28 (04) E6
- 10 Aryan HE, Ozgur BM, Jandial R, Levy ML. Subfrontal transbasal approach and technique for resection of craniopharyngioma. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 18 (6A): E10
- 11 Suanchan N, Sriamornrattanakul K, Phumyoo T. The course of the main trunk and parietal branch of the superficial temporal artery for a pterional scalp flap with superficial temporal artery preservation: cadaveric and clinical study. Asian J Neurosurg 2025; 20 (03) 581-589
- 12 Ingprasert S, Pathomvanich D, Pinyopawasutthi P. Donor site assessment for female hairline restoration in Southeast Asians. Dermatol Surg 2018; 44 (07) 1012-1017
- 13 Tanikawa R. Technical points of interhemispheric approach for anterior communicating aneurysms. Surge Cereb Stroke. 2002; 30: 208-212
- 14 Katsuno M, Tanikawa R, Miyazaki T. et al. The results of interhemispheric approach for unruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Nosotchu No Geka 2012; 40: 106-111
- 15 Noda K, Tanikawa R, Kamiyama H. et al. Interhemispheric approach for Acom aneurysm. Jpn J Neurosurg (Tokyo) 2012; 21: 834-841
- 16 Takeuchi S, Tanikawa R, Katsuno M. et al. An effective method of frontal sinus reconstruction after bifrontal craniotomy: experience with 103 patients. World Neurosurg 2015; 83 (06) 907-911
- 17 Jean-Philippe H, Benoît B, Françoise K, Michael D. Anatomy and external landmarks of the superficial temporal artery using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 2021; 43 (02) 283-290
- 18 Koziej M, Trybus M, Hołda M. et al. The superficial temporal artery: anatomical map for facial reconstruction and aesthetic procedures. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (08) 815-823
- 19 Pinar YA, Govsa F. Anatomy of the superficial temporal artery and its branches: its importance for surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 2006; 28 (03) 248-253
- 20 Kleintjes WG. Forehead anatomy: arterial variations and venous link of the midline forehead flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (06) 593-606
- 21 Salas E, Ziyal IM, Bejjani GK, Sekhar LN. Anatomy of the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve and indications for interfascial dissection. Neurosurgery 1998; 43 (03) 563-568 , discussion 568–569
- 22 Sriamornrattanakul K, Akharathammachote N, Wongsuriyanan S. Suprafascial dissection for pterional craniotomy to preserve the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve with less temporal hollowing. Surg Neurol Int 2021; 12: 559
- 23 Gabrielli MA, Monnazzi MS, Gabrielli MF, Hochuli-Vieira E, Pereira-Filho VA, Mendes Dantas MV. Clinical evaluation of the bicoronal flap in the treatment of facial fractures. Retrospective study of 132 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40 (01) 51-54
- 24 Rajmohan S, Tauro D, Bagulkar B, Vyas A. Coronal/hemicoronal approach - a gateway to craniomaxillofacial region. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9 (08) PC01-PC05
- 25 Tayfur V, Edizer M, Magden O. Anatomic bases of superficial temporal artery and temporal branch of facial nerve. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21 (06) 1945-1947
- 26 Tubbs RS, O'Neil Jr JT, Key CD. et al. Superficial temporal artery as an external landmark for deeper-lying brain structures. Clin Anat 2007; 20 (05) 498-501
- 27 Kim BS, Jung YJ, Chang CH, Choi BY. The anatomy of the superficial temporal artery in adult Koreans using 3-dimensional computed tomographic angiogram: clinical research. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2013; 15 (03) 145-151
- 28 Koziej M, Wnuk J, Polak J. et al. The superficial temporal artery: a meta-analysis of its prevalence and morphology. Clin Anat 2020; 33 (08) 1130-1137
- 29 Shin KJ, Shin HJ, Lee SH, Koh KS, Song WC. Surgical anatomy of the superficial temporal artery to prevent facial nerve injury during arterial biopsy. Clin Anat 2018; 31 (04) 608-613
