RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806756
Strategy and Measures to Improve Breast Imaging Services at General Facility Hospital
Funding and Sponsorship None.
Abstract
Background
Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide and is the most common cancer affecting women in Saudi Arabia. This research aims to highlight the strategy and measures needed to improve breast imaging services focusing on imaging justification, optimization, acquisition, and interpretation.
Patients and Methods
The Find, Organize, Clarify, Understand, Select – Plan, Do, Check, Act (FOCUS-PDCA) methodology of quality improvement was adopted. In phase one, identification of deficiencies or problems was made by evaluating imaging requests, time management, workforce, and resource utilization between 2015 and 2017 (3 years). These were presented on a fishbone diagram. Optimization of services was made by appointing or training reliable breast imaging staff. The action plan and changes were subsequently implemented and their effects, in terms of improvement in justified imaging requests, increase in the number of screening studies, imaging acquisition, reporting by specialists, and adherence to a standard Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System mammography reporting format, were evaluated from 2018 till the end of 2021.
Results
Total mammographic studies almost doubled in a year (from an average of 225 per annum in preintervention years to 443 exams postintervention), in which mammography screening studies increased three times in the postintervention period. Breast imaging referrals were streamlined primarily under primary care physicians and breast surgeons, with more than double referrals for the screening studies. Standard reporting was achieved in more than 90% of studies compared to 60% initially.
Conclusion
Breast imaging services can be improved by promoting awareness and education to patients and primary physicians, streamlining imaging requests, properly utilizing time and resources, ensuring imaging acquisition, and interpretation by specialists.
Data Availability Statement
Data associated with the research will be provided upon reasonable request from the authors.
Authors' Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by K.B.W., A.A.G.A., S.A.A., and M.Z.U.H. The first draft of the manuscript was written by K.B.W., A.W., L.H.A.-J., M.A.A. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Principles
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. März 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68 (06) 394-424
- 2 Waheed KB, Hassan MZU, Hassan DA. et al. Breast cancers missed during screening in a tertiary-care hospital mammography facility. Ann Saudi Med 2019; 39 (04) 236-243
- 3 Culbertson MG, Bennett K, Kelly CM, Sharp L, Cahir C. The psychosocial determinants of quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a scoping review. BMC Cancer 2020; 20 (01) 948
- 4 American Cancer Society. Recommendations for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer. 2021 . Accessed December 30, 2021 at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/screening-tests-and-early-detection.html
- 5 Iranmakani S, Mortezazadeh T, Sajadian F. et al. A review of various modalities in breast imaging: technical aspects and clinical outcomes. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2020; 51: 1-22
- 6 Drukteinis JS, Mooney BP, Flowers CI, Gatenby RA. Beyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screening. Am J Med 2013; 126 (06) 472-479
- 7 World Health Organization. International Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC) Saudi Arabia. Source: Globocan 2018. . Accessed January 5, 2022 at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/682-saudi-arabia-fact-sheets.pdf
- 8 Narayan AK, Lee CI, Lehman CD. Screening for breast cancer. Med Clin North Am 2020; 104 (06) 1007-1021
- 9 Coleman C. Early detection and screening for breast cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 2017; 33 (02) 141-155
- 10 AlSaleh KA. Efficacy of breast cancer screening program in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2022; 43 (04) 428-430
- 11 Abulkhair OA, Al Tahan FM, Young SE, Musaad SM, Jazieh AR. The first national public breast cancer screening program in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 2010; 30 (05) 350-357
- 12 da Costa Vieira RA, Biller G, Uemura G, Ruiz CA, Curado MP. Breast cancer screening in developing countries. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2017; 72 (04) 244-253
- 13 Gastounioti A, McCarthy AM, Pantalone L, Synnestvedt M, Kontos D, Conant EF. Effect of mammographic screening modality on breast density assessment: digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiology 2019; 291 (02) 320-327
- 14 Magny SJ, Shikhman R, Keppke AL. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. August 31, 2021. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; ; January 2022
- 15 Brown SL, Massoudi BL, Pina JM, Madamala K. Public health quality improvement exchange: a tool to support advancements in public health practice. Online J Public Health Inform 2018; 10 (03) e223
- 16 Cox M, Sandberg K. Modeling causal relationships in quality improvement. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2018; 48 (07) 182-185
- 17 Kryzanowski J, Bloomquist CD, Dunn-Pierce T, Murphy L, Clarke S, Neudorf C. Quality improvement as a population health promotion opportunity to reorient the healthcare system. Can J Public Health 2019; 110 (01) 58-61
- 18 Kudla AU, Brook OR. Quality and efficiency improvement tools for every radiologist. Acad Radiol 2018; 25 (06) 757-766
- 19 Reilly JB, Myers JS, Salvador D, Trowbridge RL. Use of a novel, modified fishbone diagram to analyze diagnostic errors. Diagnosis (Berl) 2014; 1 (02) 167-171
- 20 Duffy SW, Vulkan D, Cuckle H. et al. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality (UK Age trial): final results of a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21 (09) 1165-1172
- 21 Oshima SM, Tait SD, Fish L, Greenup RA, Grimm LJ. Primary care provider perspectives on screening mammography in older women: a qualitative study. Prev Med Rep 2021; 22: 101380
- 22 Haas JS, Barlow WE, Schapira MM. et al; PROSPR (Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens) consortium. Primary care providers' beliefs and recommendations and use of screening mammography by their patients. J Gen Intern Med 2017; 32 (04) 449-457
- 23 World Health Organization. Promoting Cancer Early Diagnosis. 2021 . Accessed December 29, 2021 at: https://www.who.int/activities/promoting-cancer-early-diagnosis#:~:text=Early%20diagnosis%20of%20cancer%20focuses,and%20higher%20costs%20of%20care
- 24 Greenfield G, Foley K, Majeed A. Rethinking primary care's gatekeeper role. BMJ 2016; 354: i4803
- 25 National Cancer Institute. Mammograms. 2021 . Accessed January 2, 2022 at: https://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/mammograms-fact-sheet#what-is-a-mammogram
- 26 Valier ARS. Looking to improve your practice? Consider the science of quality improvement to get started. J Athl Train 2020; 55 (11) 1137-1141
- 27 Ramzi S, Cant PJ. Comparison of the urgent referral for suspected breast cancer process with patient age and a predictive multivariable model. BJS Open 2021; 5 (02) zraa023
- 28 Leithner D, Horvat JV, Ochoa-Albiztegui RE. et al. Imaging and the completion of the omics paradigm in breast cancer. Radiologe 2018; 58 (Suppl. 01) 7-13
- 29 Al-Zalabani AH, Alharbi KD, Fallatah NI, Alqabshawi RI, Al-Zalabani AA, Alghamdi SM. Breast cancer knowledge and screening practice and barriers among women in Madinah, Saudi Arabia. J Cancer Educ 2018; 33 (01) 201-207
- 30 National Cancer Policy Forum, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Assessing and Improving the Interpretation of Breast Images: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); ; October 23, 2015
- 31 Pollack EB, Abbey G, DuCharme P. et al. Developing breast imaging services in low-resource settings. Appl Radiol 2022; 51 (02) 28-32
- 32 Ginsburg O, Yip CH, Brooks A. et al. Breast cancer early detection: a phased approach to implementation. Cancer 2020; 126 (Suppl. 10) 2379-2393
- 33 González Moreno IM, Trejo-Falcón J, Matsumoto MM. et al. Radiology volunteers to support a breast cancer screening program in Peru: description of the project, preliminary results, and impressions. Radiologia (Engl Ed) 2022; 64 (03) 256-265
- 34 Scheel JR, Nealey EM, Orem J. et al. ACR BI-RADS use in low-income countries: an analysis of diagnostic breast ultrasound practice in Uganda. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13 (02) 163-169
- 35 Mariani G, Kasznia-Brown J, Paez D. et al. Improving women's health in low-income and middle-income countries. Part I: challenges and priorities. Nucl Med Commun 2017; 38 (12) 1019-1023
- 36 Hickman SE, Baxter GC, Gilbert FJ. Adoption of artificial intelligence in breast imaging: evaluation, ethical constraints and limitations. Br J Cancer 2021; 125 (01) 15-22