Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1802555
“Eklavya”: Do-It-Yourself Model: A Rolled Latex Sheet Conduit for Microsurgical Training
Funding None.
Abstract
Objective To introduce a simple and innovative low-fidelity microsurgical model using daily articles available in any plastic surgery operation theatre and to determine its quality, ease of use and cost-effectiveness.
Materials and Methods The model is essentially made by rolling a loose disposable glove upon a K-wire to create a true micro-vessel (< 2 mm). Adjustment in the size and thickness of the conduit can be made. Model was assessed by data obtained from subjective questionnaire to 29 experienced microsurgeons with more than 5 years of independent microsurgical practice. This experience of our model was compared with their experience with other material and animal tissue.
Results The chicken femoral is the best compared to rat model overall, but rolled latex is as good or second best as far as some of the features assessed.
Conclusion “Eklavya” microsurgical model provides a valuable alternative to traditional animal models, allowing trainees to practice and hone their skills without the ethical and financial concerns associated with live animal use.
Note
The model is named after “Eklavya,” a character in the Mahabharata who developed mastery over his craft in archery, by learning on his own, only to lose it by sacrificing the thumb of his dominant hand to his chosen guru “Dronacharya.” Who knows, Eklavya would have benefited from microsurgical procedures that exist today!
Publication History
Article published online:
03 February 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Smith CD, Scarf D. Spacing repetitions over long timescales: a review and a reconsolidation explanation. Front Psychol 2017; 8: 962
- 2 Fox JG, Lipman NS. Infections transmitted by large and small laboratory animals. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1991; 5 (01) 131-163
- 3 Kaufman T, Hurwitz DJ, Ballantyne DL. The foliage leaf in microvascular surgery. Microsurgery 1984; 5 (01) 57-58
- 4 Al Azrak M, Ogawa R. Dermatologic microsutures using human hair: a useful technique in cutaneous stitching. Eplasty 2017; 17: e24
- 5 Stogowski P, Fliciński F, Białek J, Dąbrowski F, Piotrowski M, Mazurek T. Microsurgical Anastomosis Rating Scale (MARS10): a final product scoring system for initial microsurgical training. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2021; 29 (04) 243-249
- 6 Weber D, Moser N, Rösslein R. A synthetic model for microsurgical training: a surgical contribution to reduce the number of animal experiments. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1997; 7 (04) 204-206
- 7 Kang BY, Jeon BJ, Lee KT, Mun GH. Comprehensive analysis of chicken vessels as microvascular anastomosis training model. Arch Plast Surg 2017; 44 (01) 12-18
- 8 Mutoh T, Ishikawa T, Ono H, Yasui N. A new polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel vascular model (KEZLEX) for microvascular anastomosis training. Surg Neurol Int 2010; 1: 74
- 9 Acland R, Raja Sabapathy S. Acland's Practice Manual for Microvascular Surgery. 3rd ed.. Mumbai: The Indian Society for Surgery of the Hand (ISSH); 2008
- 10 Kamath JB, Kamath SJ. A custom-made latex conduit for simulation of microvascular repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (05) 1634-1635
- 11 Aderibigbe RO, Ademola SA, Michael IA, Olawoye OA, Iyun AO, Oluwatosin OM. Latex glove conduit as improvised blood vessel model for microvascular anastomosis training. JPRAS Open 2020; 24: 15-19
- 12 Almarghoub MA. A simple and cost-effective method for practicing microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (03) e2146
- 13 Hsieh YH, Chang TNJ. Novel and efficient synthetic microvascular anastomosis training model. Int Microsur J 2017;1