Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Child Science 2024; 14(01): e59-e65
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788731
Original Article

Efficacy of Metronidazole in the Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Mass

Seiya Ogata
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
,
Hirofumi Shimizu
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
,
Kakeru Machino
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
,
Keiichi Kakuta
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
,
Kotaro Mimori
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
,
Yosuke Minami
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
,
Yudai Goto
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
,
Michitoshi Yamashita
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
,
Hideaki Tanaka 
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background In patients with complicated appendicitis, interval appendectomy (IA) with a single broad-spectrum antibiotic sometimes fails. We reviewed our experience of adding metronidazole (MNZ) in such situations.

Methods Medical records of children with an appendiceal mass treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics followed by IA from March 2009 to May 2019 were reviewed. In the latter period (after April 2015, Group L, n = 14), MNZ was added if symptoms were not improved by a 3- to 4-day course of antibiotics. The body temperature, white blood cell count (WBC), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), treatment failure, and hospital stay for the initial treatment were collected in the earlier period (Group E, n = 14) and Group L.

Results There was no treatment failure. Group E tended to require a longer hospital stay (14.0 vs. 11.1 days, p = 0.099); however, the temperature, WBC, and CRP on admission were not significantly different. In the MNZ-added group (n = 8), the mean rate of change (per day) in WBC before and after the addition of MNZ were −288 ± 1,155 and −3,870 ± 1,634, respectively (p = 0.001). All patients underwent IA in about 3 months.

Conclusions This preliminary study may indicate the efficacy of MNZ combined with a broad-spectrum antibiotic followed by IA for intractable appendiceal masses.

Keywords

children - complicated appendicitis - appendiceal mass - interval appendectomy - metronidazole

Authors' Contribution

H.S. and M.Y. designed the study. S.O., K.Ma., K.K., K.Mi., Y.M., and Y.G. manage the patients. S.O. collected the data, and S.O., H.S., and H.T. analyzed the data. S.O. wrote the draft and H.T. critically reviewed the manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 06 November 2023

Accepted: 14 July 2024

Article published online:
01 August 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Kogut KA, Blakely ML, Schropp KP. et al. The association of elevated percent bands on admission with failure and complications of interval appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36 (01) 165-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Henry MC, Gollin G, Islam S. et al. Matched analysis of nonoperative management vs immediate appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (01) 19-23 , discussion 23–24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Levin T, Whyte C, Borzykowski R, Han B, Blitman N, Harris B. Nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis in children: can CT predict outcome?. Pediatr Radiol 2007; 37 (03) 251-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Weber TR, Keller MA, Bower RJ, Spinner G, Vierling K. Is delayed operative treatment worth the trouble with perforated appendicitis is children?. Am J Surg 2003; 186 (06) 685-688 , discussion 688–689
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Nadler EP, Reblock KK, Vaughan KG, Meza MP, Ford HR, Gaines BA. Predictors of outcome for children with perforated appendicitis initially treated with non-operative management. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2004; 5 (04) 349-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Talishinskiy T, Limberg J, Ginsburg H, Kuenzler K, Fisher J, Tomita S. Factors associated with failure of nonoperative treatment of complicated appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51 (07) 1174-1176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Thompson GC, Schuh S, Gravel J. et al; Pediatric Emergency Research Canada. Variation in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis at Canadian Pediatric Hospitals. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22 (07) 811-822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS. et al. Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2010; 11 (01) 79-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lee JY, Ally S, Kelly B, Kays D, Thames L. Once daily dosing of ceftriaxone and metronidazole in children with perforated appendicitis. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2016; 21 (02) 140-145
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rangel SJ, Anderson BR, Srivastava R. et al; Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings (PRIS) Network. Intravenous versus oral antibiotics for the prevention of treatment failure in children with complicated appendicitis: has the abandonment of peripherally inserted catheters been justified?. Ann Surg 2017; 266 (02) 361-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Shang Q, Geng Q, Zhang X, Guo C. The efficacy of combined therapy with metronidazole and broad-spectrum antibiotics on postoperative outcomes for pediatric patients with perforated appendicitis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96 (47) e8849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Taleb M, Nardi N, Arnaud A. et al. Simplification of first-line antibacterial regimen for complicated appendicitis in children is associated with better adherence to guidelines and reduced use of antibiotics. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2018; 52 (02) 293-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Vane DW, Fernandez N. Role of interval appendectomy in the management of complicated appendicitis in children. World J Surg 2006; 30 (01) 51-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bratton SL, Haberkern CM, Waldhausen JHT. Acute appendicitis risks of complications: age and Medicaid insurance. Pediatrics 2000; 106 (1 Pt 1): 75-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Martín-Del Olmo JC, Concejo-Cutoli P, Vaquero-Puerta C, López-Mestanza C, Gómez-López JR. Clinical prediction rules in acute appendicitis: which combination of variables is more effective at predicting?. Cir Cir 2022; 90 (S2): 42-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (06) 877-881
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kharbanda AB, Vazquez-Benitez G, Ballard DW. et al. Development and validation of a novel pediatric appendicitis risk calculator (pARC). Pediatrics 2018; 141 (04) e20172699
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Becker T, Kharbanda A, Bachur R. Atypical clinical features of pediatric appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14 (02) 124-129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Risteski T, Sokolova R, Memeti S. et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in pediatric patients: operative and postoperative experience. J Clin Trials Exp Investig. 2022; 1: 49-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mendoza-Zuchini A, Arce-Polania LC, Pérez-Rivera CJ. Intravenous antibiotic therapy after laparoscopic appendectomy in acute complicated appendicitis: the patient clinical response is the key. Cir Cir 2023; 91 (04) 479-485
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tannoury J, Abboud B. Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19 (25) 3942-3950
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, Tekkis PP. A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 2010; 147 (06) 818-829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Farr BJ, Carey DE, Mooney DP. When to take it out? Optimal timing of interval appendectomy in 500 consecutive children. J Pediatr Surg 2021; 56 (10) 1822-1825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gonzalez DO, Deans KJ, Minneci PC. Role of non-operative management in pediatric appendicitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2016; 25 (04) 204-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lee SL, Islam S, Cassidy LD, Abdullah F, Arca MJ. 2010 American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Clinical Trials Committee. Antibiotics and appendicitis in the pediatric population: an American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Clinical Trials Committee systematic review. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (11) 2181-2185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Willis ZI, Duggan EM, Gillon J, Blakely ML, Di Pentima MC. Improvements in antimicrobial prescribing and outcomes in pediatric complicated appendicitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2018; 37 (05) 429-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar