CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787871
Original Article

Normative Values for Thumb Length in Central Indian Adult Population

1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Government Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
M. R. Thatte
2   Department of Plastic Surgery, Bombay Hospital Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Mansi Saraf
3   Department of Surgery, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Government Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Rajesh Bobba
3   Department of Surgery, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Government Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Dhananjaya Sharma
3   Department of Surgery, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Government Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Jagmoah Singh Dhakar
4   Department of Community Medicine, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Government Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction This article aims to establish the relative thumb length in comparison to the index finger in central Indian adults.

Materials and Methods Five hundred normal adult hands (1,000 thumbs), 316 men and 184 women, mean age 30 years, were included in the study. The relative length of the thumb was measured using the length of the proximal phalanx of the index finger (thumb–proximal phalanx index) and the distance between the proximal digital crease and proximal interphalangeal crease of the index finger (thumb–digital crease index).

Results The tip of a normal adducted thumb extends to 69% of the length of the proximal phalanx of the index finger and 38% of the distance between the two proximal creases of the index finger. The tip of a normal adducted thumb extends to 68% for male and 69% for female of the length of the proximal phalanx of the index finger. For the dominant hand the tip of a normal adducted thumb extends to 68%, while for nondominant hand it reaches 71% of the length of the proximal phalanx of the index finger. The difference between the laterality, gender, and hand dominance was not statistically significant.

Conclusion The tip of a normal adducted thumb extends to 69% of the length of the proximal phalanx of the index finger and 38% of the distance between the two proximal creases of the index finger. Relative normal thumb length is independent of gender, laterality, or hand dominance.

Authors' Contributions

P.A. was responsible for data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. M.R.T. contributed to conceptualization, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. M.S. focused on data collection and data analysis, while R.B. also handled data collection and data analysis. D.S. took part in manuscript writing and editing, and J.S.D. was involved in data analysis.




Publication History

Article published online:
25 June 2024

© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Tachdjian M. Congenital longitudinal deficiency of the thumb. In: Tachdjian M. ed. Pediatric Orthopaedics. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990: 260-269
  • 2 Catalano III LW, Browne RH, Carter PR, Frobish AC, Ezaki M, Littler JW. The Littler line method and the area under a Gaussian curve: a new method of assessing digital range of motion. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (01) 23-30
  • 3 Campbell Reid DA, McGrouther DA. Congenital anomalies of the thumb. In: Campbell Reid DA, McGrouther DA. eds. Surgery of the Thumb. London: Butterworths; 1986: 171-202
  • 4 Sunil TM. Clinical indicators of normal thumb length in adults. J Hand Surg Am 2004; 29 (03) 489-493
  • 5 Park AE, Fernandez JJ, Schmedders K, Cohen MS. The Fibonacci sequence: relationship to the human hand. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28 (01) 157-160
  • 6 Goldfarb CA, Gee AO, Heinze LK, Manske PR. Normative values for thumb length, girth, and width in the pediatric population. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30 (05) 1004-1008 Erratum in: J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006 Sep;31(7):1242. PMID: 16182058
  • 7 Jain DK, Sugumar A. Normative study of paediatric hand in an Indian population and a novel method of measurement of first web space arc radius. Int J Orthopaed Sci 2017; 3: 1-4
  • 8 Mutluay ŞD. Normative values for thumb length in young adult population. Mkutfd. 2019; 10 (38) 94-98
  • 9 Decramer A, De Smet L. Clinical measurement of normal thumb length in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 2007; 16 (01) 66-69
  • 10 Odita JC, Okolo AA, Ukoli F. Normal values for metacarpal and phalangeal lengths in Nigerian children. Skeletal Radiol 1991; 20 (06) 441-445
  • 11 Poznanski AK, Gartman S. A bibliography covering the use of metacarpophalangeal pattern profile analysis in bone dysplasias, congenital malformation syndromes, and other disorders. Pediatr Radiol 1997; 27 (05) 358-365
  • 12 Mohite Hemlata S, Kakade Satish V, Mohite Sandeep S, Roy Priya P, Doshi Megha A. Estimation of stature & gender from thumb indices in Indian population. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2021; 16 (01) 66-75
  • 13 Vijaya Kumari N, Karthikeyan A. Estimation of stature from length of thumb in Salem population. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol. 2019; 12 (02) 142-146
  • 14 Haroon TM, Tiwari RVC, Mahajan A. et al. Occlusal vertical dimension and its association with length of thumb: an original research. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2022; 14 (Suppl. 01) S304-S306
  • 15 Chandra P, Gupta A, Singh P, Kulshreshtha V, Garg S, Prakash G. A study of correlation between stature and thumb length. J Anat Sci 2016; 24 (01) 47-51