Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787756
Contributors to Electronic Health Record-Integrated Secure Messaging Use: A Study of Over 33,000 Health Care Professionals
Authors
Funding This study was supported by a grant from the American Medical Association's Practice Transformation Initiative.
Abstract
Objectives Electronic health record (EHR)-integrated secure messaging is extensively used for communication between clinicians. We investigated the factors contributing to secure messaging use in a large health care system.
Methods This was a cross-sectional study that included 14 hospitals and 263 outpatient clinic locations. Data on EHR-integrated secure messaging use over a 1-month period (February 1, 2023, through February 28, 2023) were collected. A multilevel mixed effects model was used to assess the contribution of clinical role, clinical unit (i.e., specific inpatient ward or outpatient clinic), hospital or clinic location (i.e., Hospital X or Outpatient Clinic Building Y), and inpatient versus outpatient setting toward secure messaging use.
Results Of the 33,195 health care professionals who worked during the study period, 20,576 (62%) were secure messaging users. In total, 25.3% of the variability in messaging use was attributable to the clinical unit and 30.5% was attributable to the hospital or clinic location. Compared with nurses, advanced practice providers, pharmacists, and physicians were more likely to use secure messaging, whereas medical assistants, social workers, and therapists were less likely (p < 0.001). After adjusting for other factors, inpatient versus outpatient setting was not associated with secure messaging use.
Conclusion Secure messaging was widely used; however, there was substantial variation by clinical role, clinical unit, and hospital or clinic location. Our results suggest that interventions and policies for managing secure messaging behaviors are likely to be most effective if they are not only set at the organizational level but also communicated and tailored toward individual clinical units and clinician workflows.
Keywords
communication - electronic health records - adoption of new technology - secure messaging - interprofessional communicationProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
This study was approved by the Washington University institutional review board with a waiver of informed consent (IRB no.: 202205084).
Publication History
Received: 15 January 2024
Accepted: 22 May 2024
Article published online:
24 July 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Edwards A, Fitzpatrick L-A, Augustine S. et al. Synchronous communication facilitates interruptive workflow for attending physicians and nurses in clinical settings. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (09) 629-637
- 2 Spencer R, Coiera E, Logan P. Variation in communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2004; 44 (03) 268-273
- 3 Manojlovich M, Harrod M, Hofer TP, Lafferty M, McBratnie M, Krein SL. Using qualitative methods to explore communication practices in the context of patient care rounds on general care units. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35 (03) 839-845
- 4 In US, SMS text messaging tops mobile phone calling. New York: NIELSEN.; Accessed October 3, 2008 at: https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2008/in-us-text-messaging-tops-mobile-phone-calling.html
- 5 Byrd TF, Fancher KG, Liebovitz DM, O'Leary KJ. Trends in secure mobile communication technology use among hospitalists in North America, 2016–2021. Health Policy Technol 2022; 11 (04) 100689
- 6 Liu X, Sutton PR, McKenna R. et al. Evaluation of secure messaging applications for a health care system: a case study. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 140-150
- 7 Steitz BD, Unertl KM, Levy MA. An analysis of electronic health record work to manage asynchronous clinical messages among breast cancer care teams. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (04) 877-887
- 8 Hagedorn PA, Singh A, Luo B, Bonafide CP, Simmons JM. Secure text messaging in healthcare: latent threats and opportunities to improve patient safety. J Hosp Med 2020; 15 (06) 378-380
- 9 Patel N, Siegler JE, Stromberg N, Ravitz N, Hanson CW. Perfect storm of inpatient communication needs and an innovative solution utilizing smartphones and secured messaging. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (03) 777-789
- 10 Chandra S, Oberg M, Hilburn G, Wu DT, Adhyaru BB. Improving communication in a large urban academic safety net hospital system: implementation of secure messaging. J Med Syst 2023; 47 (01) 56
- 11 Luu T, Spiegelman L, Nykin D. et al. Implementation of an electronic health record-based messaging system in the emergency department: effects on physician workflow and resident burnout. J Patient Saf 2022; 18 (02) e542-e546
- 12 Arscott WT, Gray K, Kuska D. et al. Evaluating the impact of secure mobile messaging on communication and cancer care team satisfaction in a large radiation oncology clinic. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15 (08) e733-e738
- 13 Przybylo JA, Wang A, Loftus P, Evans KH, Chu I, Shieh L. Smarter hospital communication: secure smartphone text messaging improves provider satisfaction and perception of efficacy, workflow. J Hosp Med 2014; 9 (09) 573-578
- 14 Wu R, Lo V, Morra D. et al. A smartphone-enabled communication system to improve hospital communication: usage and perceptions of medical trainees and nurses on general internal medicine wards. J Hosp Med 2015; 10 (02) 83-89
- 15 Haun JN, Hathaway W, Chavez M. et al. Clinical practice informs secure messaging benefits and best practices. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (04) 1003-1011
- 16 Byrd IV TF, Speigel PS, Cameron KA, O'Leary KJ. Barriers to adoption of a secure text messaging system: a qualitative study of practicing clinicians. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38 (05) 1224-1231
- 17 Aziz S, Barber J, Singh A, Alayari A, Rassbach CE. Resident and nurse perspectives on the use of secure text messaging systems. J Hosp Med 2022; 17 (11) 880-887
- 18 Feinberg J, Shaw S, Kashyap N. et al. Evaluating the impact of a new smartphone texting tool on patient care in obstetrics, an emergent healthcare setting. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (05) 879-887
- 19 Hansen JE, Lazow M, Hagedorn PA. Reducing interdisciplinary communication failures through secure text messaging: a quality improvement project. Pediatr Qual Saf 2018; 3 (01) e053
- 20 Baratta LR, Harford D, Sinsky CA, Kannampallil T, Lou SS. Characterizing the patterns of electronic health record-integrated secure messaging use: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25: e48583
- 21 Small W, Iturrate E, Austrian J, Genes N. Electronic health record messaging patterns of health care professionals in inpatient medicine. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (12) e2349136-e2349136
- 22 Kwan B, Bell JF, Longhurst CA, Goldhaber NH, Clay B. Implementation of an electronic health record-integrated instant messaging system in an academic health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024; 31 (04) 997-1000
- 23 Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H. et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60 (04) 290-297
- 24 Python Software Foundation. Python Language Reference, Version 3.9.16. 2021
- 25 Grossi A, Hoxhaj I, Gabutti I. et al. Hospital contextual factors affecting the implementation of health technologies: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21 (01) 407
- 26 Cresswell K, Sheikh A. Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82 (05) e73-e86
- 27 Gagnon M-P, Desmartis M, Labrecque M. et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst 2012; 36 (01) 241-277
- 28 Alexander G, Staggers N. A systematic review of the designs of clinical technology: findings and recommendations for future research. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2009; 32 (03) 252-279
- 29 Boonstra A, Broekhuis M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10 (01) 231
- 30 Pourmand A, Roberson J, Gallugi A, Sabha Y, O'Connell F. Secure smartphone application-based text messaging in emergency department, a system implementation and review of literature. Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36 (09) 1680-1685
- 31 Byrd IV TF, Kim JS, Yeh C, Lee J, O'Leary KJ. Technology acceptance and critical mass: development of a consolidated model to explain the actual use of mobile health care communication tools. J Biomed Inform 2021; 117: 103749
- 32 Liebowitz SJ, Margolis SE. Network externality: an uncommon tragedy. J Econ Perspect 1994; 8 (02) 133-150
- 33 Yousef CC, Salgado TM, Farooq A. et al. Predicting health care providers' acceptance of a personal health record secure messaging feature. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (01) 148-160
