Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787655
Original Article

Patient-Based Ratio Method for Permanent Zone Donor Area Calculation in Hair Transplant

Sudhanshu Punia
1   Aesthetic and Cosmetic Plastic Surgery, Divine Aesthetic Surgery, Greater Kailash, New Delhi, India
,
Aakanksha Goel 
1   Aesthetic and Cosmetic Plastic Surgery, Divine Aesthetic Surgery, Greater Kailash, New Delhi, India
,
Amit Gupta
1   Aesthetic and Cosmetic Plastic Surgery, Divine Aesthetic Surgery, Greater Kailash, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Most common type of hair loss is androgenetic alopecia. Orentreich's donor dominance theory and the definition of safe donor area are the theoretical foundation of modern hair transplantation. In safe donor area no progression of permanent hair loss occurs. Its knowledge is important to prevent loss of transplanted hair. Estimation is not tailored to every patient, also in early stages, the margins are assumed to be free from future hair loss. Our study is an attempt to find and establish a relationship between safe zone dimensions and other standard scalp dimensions, and effectively predict the complete safe zone in early stages of hair loss.

Materials and Methods From July to December 2022, the first 100 patients with Norwood IV onwards of hair loss were included. Then, the distance between the vertex and the point of change in occipital hair quality and density was measured, and from this point till occipital protuberance were taken. The ratio between the two was taken. In the next 100 patients of Norwood II to IVa, the applicability of the new ratio to assess the permanent zone was used.

Results Ratio method takes into account the patient's measurements, that is, permanent zone and total distance from vertex occiput. The ratio range we got is:

Permanent zone: total distance from vertex to occiput: 0.43–0.53

Therefore, the permanent zone would be equal to = total distance from vertex to occiput × 0.43–0.53. With the lower limit being the occiput. Over 90% of the patients did not have significant reduction in density of transplanted hair.

Conclusion The authors suggest the use of this ratio method to determine the dimensions of the permanent zone especially in patients with early grades of hair loss as per the Norwood scale. It is a simple, effective, and easily applicable concept that can ensure long-lasting results in patients undergoing hair transplants.

Keywords

ratio method in hair transplant - divine permanent zone - permanent donor zone


Publication History

Article published online:
12 June 2024

© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Khumalo NP, Jessop S, Gumedze F, Ehrlich R. Hairdressing and the prevalence of scalp disease in African adults. Br J Dermatol 2007; 157 (05) 981-988
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hamilton JB. Patterned loss of hair in man; types and incidence. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1951; 53 (03) 708-728
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Orentreich N. Autografts in alopecias and other selected dermatological conditions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1959; 83: 463-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Knudsen RG. The donor area. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2004; 12 (02) 233-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hoffmann R, Happle R. Current understanding of androgenetic alopecia. Part II: clinical aspects and treatment. Eur J Dermatol 2000; 10 (05) 410-417
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Unger W. Delineating the safe donor area for hair transplanting. J Am Acad Cosmet Surg 1994; 4: 239-243
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, Gilchrest BA, Paller AS, Leffell DJ, Wolff K. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Cole J, Devroye J. A calculated look at the donor area. Hair Transplant Forum Intl 2001; 11: 150-154
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Bernstein RM, Rassman WR. Follicular transplantation. Patient evaluation and surgical planning. Dermatol Surg 1997; 23 (09) 771-784 , discussion 801–805
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rassman WR, Carson S. Micrografting in extensive quantities. The ideal hair restoration procedure. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21 (04) 306-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Park JH, Na YC, Moh JS, Lee SY, You SH. Predicting the permanent safe donor area for hair transplantation in Koreans with male pattern baldness according to the position of the parietal whorl. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 277-284
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chouhan K, Kota RS, Kumar A, Gupta J. Assessment of safe donor zone of scalp and beard for follicular unit extraction in Indian men: a study of 580 cases. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2019; 12 (01) 31-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kumaresan M, Mysore V. Controversies in hair transplantation. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2018; 11 (04) 173-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yepuri V, Mysore V. Effects of hormones on hair. In: Mysore V. ed. Hair Transplantation. 1st ed.. New Delhi, India: Jaypee; 2016: 21-23
    Google Scholar