RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787001
Effect of Grinding and Polishing Protocols on Surface Roughness, Flexural Strength, and Phase Transformation of High-Translucent 5 mol% Yttria-Partially Stabilized Zirconia
Autor*innen
Funding The work was supported by the Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University (grant number DRF66027).
Abstract
Objectives This study evaluated surface roughness, biaxial flexural strength, and phase transformation of 5Y-PSZ after grinding and polishing with different protocols.
Material and Methods Two commercial 5Y-PSZ, Lava Esthetic (L) and Cercon xt (C), were used and divided into 3 groups: LC and CC represented unpolished control groups; LE and CE were polished with protocol I (EVE DIASYNT® PLUS HP following with EVE DIACERA RA); and LJ and CJ were polished with protocol II (Superfine diamond bur following with Jota ZIR Gloss polishing kit). Surface roughness was evaluated after polishing step-by-step with a contact-type profilometer. After high-gross polishing, the specimens were subjected to biaxial flexural strength test, crystallographic microstructure analysis using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD), and surface micro-topography using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Statistical Analysis Surface roughness differences after each step and biaxial flexural strength between groups were evaluated with one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. Changes in surface roughness across four different time points within groups were assessed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc analysis.
Results After high-gross polishing, both polishing protocols showed significantly lower surface roughness than the grinding group (p < 0.05). The LE and CE groups exhibited the highest surface roughness values, which were significant differences from the LJ and CJ groups (p < 0.05). The LE group showed significantly lower biaxial flexural strength compared to the LC group (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the CE and CJ groups compared to the control group (p > 0.05). Furthermore, all polishing protocols did not change the phase transformation of zirconia.
Conclusion Polishing protocol II provided a smoother surface than the protocol I after high-gross polishing, while the biaxial flexural strength of materials remained unaffected.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. Juni 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Donovan TE. Porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) alternatives. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009; 21 (01) 4-6
- 2 Pereira GK, Silvestri T, Camargo R. et al. Mechanical behavior of a Y-TZP ceramic for monolithic restorations: effect of grinding and low-temperature aging. Mater Sci Eng C 2016; 63: 70-77
- 3 Hannink RHJ, Kelly PM, Muddle BC. Transformation toughening in zirconia-containing ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 2000; 83 (03) 461-487
- 4 Zhang F, Reveron H, Spies BC, Van Meerbeek B, Chevalier J. Trade-off between fracture resistance and translucency of zirconia and lithium-disilicate glass ceramics for monolithic restorations. Acta Biomater 2019; 91: 24-34
- 5 Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Novel zirconia materials in dentistry. J Dent Res 2018; 97 (02) 140-147
- 6 Kwon SJ, Lawson NC, McLaren EE, Nejat AH, Burgess JO. Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120 (01) 132-137
- 7 Hmaidouch R, Müller WD, Lauer HC, Weigl P. Surface roughness of zirconia for full-contour crowns after clinically simulated grinding and polishing. Int J Oral Sci 2014; 6 (04) 241-246
- 8 Preis V, Grumser K, Schneider-Feyrer S, Behr M, Rosentritt M. The effectiveness of polishing kits: influence on surface roughness of zirconia. Int J Prosthodont 2015; 28 (02) 149-151
- 9 Caglar I, Ates SM, Yesil Duymus Z. The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont 2018; 10 (02) 132-137
- 10 Vichi A, Fabian Fonzar R, Goracci C, Carrabba M, Ferrari M. Effect of finishing and polishing on roughness and gloss of lithium disilicate and lithium silicate zirconia reinforced glass ceramic for CAD/CAM systems. Oper Dent 2018; 43 (01) 90-100
- 11 Sabrah AH, Cook NB, Luangruangrong P, Hara AT, Bottino MC. Full-contour Y-TZP ceramic surface roughness effect on synthetic hydroxyapatite wear. Dent Mater 2013; 29 (06) 666-673
- 12 Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109 (01) 22-29
- 13 Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 1999; 15 (06) 426-433
- 14 Ho CMB, Ding H, Chen X, Tsoi JKH, Botelho MG. The effects of dry and wet grinding on the strength of dental zirconia. Ceram Int 2018; 44 (09) 10451-10462
- 15 Mai HN, Hong SH, Kim SH, Lee DH. Effects of different finishing/polishing protocols and systems for monolithic zirconia on surface topography, phase transformation, and biofilm formation. J Adv Prosthodont 2019; 11 (02) 81-87
- 16 Aliaga R, Miotto LN, Candido LM, Fais L, Pinelli L. Does diamond stone grinding change the surface characteristics and flexural strength of monolithic zirconia?. Oper Dent 2020; 45 (03) 318-326
- 17 Huh YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Evaluation of various polishing systems and the phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116 (03) 440-449
- 18 Inokoshi M, Zhang F, De Munck J. et al. Influence of sintering conditions on low-temperature degradation of dental zirconia. Dent Mater 2014; 30 (06) 669-678
- 19 Işeri U, Ozkurt Z, Yalnız A, Kazazoğlu E. Comparison of different grinding procedures on the flexural strength of zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 107 (05) 309-315
- 20 Happe A, Röling N, Schäfer A, Rothamel D. Effects of different polishing protocols on the surface roughness of Y-TZP surfaces used for custom-made implant abutments: a controlled morphologic SEM and profilometric pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 113 (05) 440-447
- 21 Siegel SC, von Fraunhofer JA. Dental cutting with diamond burs: heavy-handed or light-touch?. J Prosthodont 1999; 8 (01) 3-9
- 22 Ahmad R, Morgano SM, Wu BM, Giordano RA. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94 (05) 421-429
- 23 Amaya-Pajares SP, Ritter AV, Vera Resendiz C, Henson BR, Culp L, Donovan TE. Effect of finishing and polishing on the surface roughness of four ceramic materials after occlusal adjustment. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28 (06) 382-396
- 24 Khayat W, Chebib N, Finkelman M, Khayat S, Ali A. Effect of grinding and polishing on roughness and strength of zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119 (04) 626-631
- 25 Nakamura K, Tarkeshi A, Niklasson A. et al. Influence of crystalline phase transformation induced by airborne-particle abrasion and low-temperature degradation on mechanical properties of dental zirconia ceramics stabilized with over 5 mol% yttria. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2022; 125: 104890
- 26 Kozmacs C, Hollmann B, Arnold WH, Naumova E, Piwowarczyk A. Polishing of monolithic zirconia crowns-results of different dental practitioner groups. Dent J 2017; 5 (04) 30
- 27 Incesu E, Yanikoglu N. Evaluation of the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 124 (01) 100-109
- 28 Sagsoz O, Demirci T, Demirci G, Sagsoz NP, Yildiz M. The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016; 8 (06) 417-422
- 29 Ccahuana VZ, Ozcan M, Mesquita AM, Nishioka RS, Kimpara ET, Bottino MA. Surface degradation of glass ceramics after exposure to acidulated phosphate fluoride. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18 (02) 155-165
- 30 Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17 (Suppl. 02) 68-81
- 31 Belichko DR, Konstantinova TE, Maletsky AV. et al. Influence of hafnium oxide on the structure and properties of powders and ceramics of the YSZ–HfO2 composition. Ceram Int 2021; 47 (03) 3142-3148
- 32 Choi JH, Mao Y, Chang JP. Development of hafnium based high-k materials—A review. Mater Sci Eng 2011; 72 (06) 97-136
- 33 Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, Ban S, Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res 2013; 57 (04) 236-261
- 34 Mao L, Kaizer MR, Zhao M, Guo B, Song YF, Zhang Y. Graded ultra-translucent zirconia (5Y-PSZ) for strength and functionalities. J Dent Res 2018; 97 (11) 1222-1228
- 35 Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53 (04) 304-313
- 36 Liu E, Xiao G, Jia W, Shu X, Yang X, Wang Y. Strain-induced phase transformation behavior of stabilized zirconia ceramics studied via nanoindentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017; 75: 14-19
- 37 McLaren EA, Lawson N, Choi J, Kang J, Trujillo C. New high-translucent cubic-phase-containing zirconia: clinical and laboratory considerations and the effect of air abrasion on strength. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2017; 38 (06) e13-e16
- 38 Abdulmajeed A, Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Närhi TO. Strength and phase transformation of different zirconia types after chairside adjustment. J Prosthet Dent 2024; 132 (02) 455-463
- 39 Karakoca S, Yılmaz H. Influence of surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of Y-TZP ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 91 (02) 930-937
- 40 Wertz M, Schmidt MB, Hoelzig H. et al. Rhombohedral phase formation in yttria-stabilized zirconia induced by dental technical tools and its impact on dental applications. Materials (Basel) 2022; 15 (13) 4471
- 41 Turteltaub S, Suiker ASJ. A multiscale thermomechanical model for cubic to tetragonal martensitic phase transformations. Int J Solids Struct 2006; 43 (14) 4509-4545
- 42 Hatanaka GR, Polli GS, Fais LMG, Reis JMDSN, Pinelli LAP. Zirconia changes after grinding and regeneration firing. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118 (01) 61-68
- 43 Hasegawa H. Rhombohedral phase produced in abraded surfaces of partially stabilized zirconia (PSZ). J Mater Sci Lett 1983; 2 (03) 91-93
- 44 Inokoshi M, Shimizu H, Nozaki K. et al. Crystallographic and morphological analysis of sandblasted highly translucent dental zirconia. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (03) 508-518
- 45 Quinn JB, Quinn GD. A practical and systematic review of Weibull statistics for reporting strengths of dental materials. Dent Mater 2010; 26 (02) 135-147
