CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2024; 15(01): 059-104
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786314
Abstracts of presentation during ENDOCON 2024, New Delhi

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD): Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in Southern India

Palabatla Rahul
1   Lisie Institute of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation (LIGHT), Ernakulam, Kerala, India
,
Prakash Zacharias
1   Lisie Institute of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation (LIGHT), Ernakulam, Kerala, India
,
Shibi Mathew
1   Lisie Institute of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation (LIGHT), Ernakulam, Kerala, India
,
Hasim Ahamed
1   Lisie Institute of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation (LIGHT), Ernakulam, Kerala, India
,
Remya R. Pai
1   Lisie Institute of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation (LIGHT), Ernakulam, Kerala, India
,
Kiran Josy Kanjamala
1   Lisie Institute of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation (LIGHT), Ernakulam, Kerala, India
,
Anvin Kurian Thomas
1   Lisie Institute of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation (LIGHT), Ernakulam, Kerala, India
,
S. Swaran Kumar
1   Lisie Institute of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation (LIGHT), Ernakulam, Kerala, India
,
Mathew Philip
1   Lisie Institute of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation (LIGHT), Ernakulam, Kerala, India
› Author Affiliations
 

Introduction: ESD is a well-established resection technique for removal of gastrointestinal tumors. We analyzed the clinical profile and outcomes in patients who underwent ESD in a tertiary care center in Southern India.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study involving the patients who underwent ESD from July 2019 to December 2023 in our institute was done. Patients underwent OGDscopy/colonoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and biopsy if needed prior to procedure.

Results: A total of 110 patients underwent the procedure, 57 (52%) are male and 53 (48%) are female. Mean age was 65.5 ± 12.1 years. Mean hospital stay was 4.16 ± 1.9 days. Largest lesion excised was 11 cm. Location of the lesion and biopsy details are tabulated ([Table 1]).

Lateral margins were involved in only 9, focal dysplasia was seen in 18, margins were clear in 83 (of which margin clearance of <1 mm was in 12). Deep margins were involved in 12 (3 had focal involvement), in the rest margins were clear in 98 (of which margin clearance of <1 mm was seen in 23).

Lymphovascular invasion was seen in only 9 (8%) requiring further management (surgical/oncological). Even in patients with deep margin involvement, almost 50% were managed conservatively and are on follow-up.

6 (5%) had circumferential lesions, of which one was removed piece-meal. On follow-up, 2 patients had stricture development requiring dilatation.

Complications: delayed bleed was seen in 5 patients, requiring endoscopic interventions, and muscle injury was seen in 15 patients managed with hemoclips.

Conclusion: ESD is feasible and effective for management of GI tumors with reduced hospital stay and low complication rate. Patient selection is very important in achieving clinical success.

Zoom Image
Table 1


Publication History

Article published online:
22 April 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India