CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2024; 15(01): 059-104
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786294
Abstracts of presentation during ENDOCON 2024, New Delhi

Medium- and Long-Term Outcomes of Per Rectal Endoscopic Myotomy for Hirschsprung’s Disease

Arun Arora Pagadapelli
1   Shivanand Desai Centre for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Rohan Yewale
1   Shivanand Desai Centre for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Parag Dashatwar
1   Shivanand Desai Centre for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Rajendra Pujari
1   Shivanand Desai Centre for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Harshal Gadhikar
1   Shivanand Desai Centre for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Amol Bapaye
1   Shivanand Desai Centre for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations
 

Introduction: Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR) is characterized by absence of ganglion cells in the submucosal and myenteric plexus of colon. Surgery—standard treatment but has significant morbidity. Per rectal endoscopic myotomy (PREM) is a novel third space procedure described for treatment of HSCR.

Aim: To evaluate technical outcomes and clinical success (measured as stool frequency, unit laxative usage, and improvement in HSCR Anorectal malformation Quality of life questionnaire [HAQL]) pre- and post-PREM.

Methods: Single-arm, single-center prospective observational study of HSCR patients treated with PREM. HSCR diagnosis: history, contrast enema, anorectal manometry, rectal EMR biopsies. Stool frequency, laxative usage, HAQL before and after PREM were compared.

Results: N = 16 (age 14 [± 14.4] years; 11 male) underwent PREM during a 7-year period. Majority (68.8%): symptoms from birth. Transition zone on barium enema + in all (100%), spastic colonic segment with proximal dilation on colonoscopy in 93.8%. Mean aganglionic segment length was 7.0 cm ± 3.9, RAIR was absent in 11 cases (68.75%), present in 5 cases (31.25%). HSCR subtypes: ultrashort segment (8/16, 50%), short segment (5/16, 31.25%), long segment (3/16, 18.75%). Mean procedure time: 91 minutes ± 28.9, mean length of hospital stay: 3.5 days. Median follow up: 8 months (IQR: 4.5–19.5). Median of the first stool frequency: 2 days (IQR: 2–2.5). Stool frequency: 1 in 4.1 (±1.3) days pre versus 1 in 1.4 (±0.8) days post-PREM (p < 0.0001). Mean laxative usage: 4.7 (±3.8) units of laxative (UL) pre versus 0.8 (±0.9) UL post-PREM (p < 0.0001). HAQL scores of 8.5 (±3.9) pre-PREM improved to 1.3 (±0.9) post-PREM (p < 0.0001) ([Table 1]).

Conclusions: PREM is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure to treat SS-HSCR. Outcomes are sustained in the long term as demonstrated by improved stool frequency rates, mean laxative use, and HAQL questionnaire.

Table 1

Characteristics at baseline and follow-up (post-PREM)

N

%

Total subjects

16

 

Gender

Male

11

68.75

Female

5

31.25

Age (in years)

mean ± SD; (range min–max)

14 ± 14.4; (1–49)

Duration of symptoms

Since birth

11

68.8

6 months

1

6.3

1 year

2

12.5

2 year

2

12.5

RAIR

Absent

11

68.75

Present

5

31.25

Ganglion cells

Absent

12

75

Present

4

25

Length of aganglionic segment in cm

Mean ± SD; median (IQR)

7 ± 3.9; 7 (7)

Length of myotomy in cm

11 ± 3.3; 10 (2)

Time to completion in min

90.9 ± 28.9; 85 (35)

Time to first stool POD in days

2.1 ± 0.7; 2 (2–2.5)

Follow-up duration (in months)

14.4 ± 15.9; 8(4.25–19.25)

Follow-up characteristics

N

%

Need for laxatives post-PREM

Lactitol 13.3 g/day (20 mL/day)—half of the initial dose

3

18.8

Lactitol 26.6 g/day (40 mL/day)

1

6.3

Lactulose 6.67 g/day—two-third of initial dose

3

18.8

PEG 17 g/day—half of the initial dose

2

12.5

None

7

43.8

Fecal incontinence post-PREM

Complete improvement

2

12.5

Partial improvement

2

12.5

Comparison of clinical outcomes pre- and post-PREM

Mean ± SD

Median (IQR)

Mean ± SD

Median (IQR)

Pre-PREM

Post-PREM

p -Value

Stool frequency

4.1 ± 1.3

4 (2)

1.4 ± 0.8

1 (1)

<0.0001a

Laxative usage

4.7 ± 3.8

4 (4)

0.8 ± 0.9

0.6 (1.3)

<0.0001a

HAQL questionnaire

8.5 ± 3.9

7 (3)

1.3 ± 0.9

1 (1)

0.0001a

Note: Groups where compared using paired t-test where p <0.05 is considered statistically significant.




Publication History

Article published online:
22 April 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India