PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2024; 09(01): e78-e88
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1785213
Original Article

Reconstruction of Upper Extremity Peripheral Nerve Injuries Using an Epineurial-Like Collagen Device—A Prospective Clinical Study

Alex O'Beirne
1   Western Orthopaedic Clinic, Murdoch, WA, Australia
,
Jaslyn Cullen
2   Jaslyn Cullen Occupational Therapy, Perth, WA, Australia
,
Euphemie Landao-Bassonga
3   Bone and Brain Group, Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
4   Centre for Orthopaedic Research, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
,
Monica Zheng
5   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
,
Clair Lee
4   Centre for Orthopaedic Research, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
,
Priya Kaluskar
3   Bone and Brain Group, Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
4   Centre for Orthopaedic Research, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
,
Andrew Tai
3   Bone and Brain Group, Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
4   Centre for Orthopaedic Research, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
,
Minghao Zheng
3   Bone and Brain Group, Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
4   Centre for Orthopaedic Research, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
› Institutsangaben Funding This work is supported by a general grant from the Perron Institute of Neurological and Translational Research
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Epineurium acts as a barrier to protect nerves from injury and maintains its structural and functional integrity. A device was developed to mimic the native structure of epineurium. The aim of this study was to evaluate its biological characteristics and clinical performance in the reconstruction of upper extremity peripheral nerves.

Methods Scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and enhanced microcomputed tomography were used to examine the ultrastructural characteristics of the device. A prospective case series with 2-year follow-up was undertaken and reported. Patients who required nerve reconstruction in the upper extremities were included and underwent single or multiple nerve reconstructions in one or both upper limbs.

Results The device mimics the structural and biological properties of epineurium. During surgical use, it can form compression-free and self-engaged wrapping around the repaired nerves. A total of 36 peripheral nerve reconstructions were performed using either nerve transfer or nerve grafting in 19 patients. Of these, 14 patients had upper limb nerve injuries and 5 had C5 to C8 spinal cord injuries resulting in tetraplegia. Nerve reconstruction using the device restored peripheral nerve function, with functional motor recovery (FMR) observed in 76% of the most proximal target muscle at 12 months and 85% of most proximal muscles at 24 months post-treatment. FMR was observed in 61% of all target muscles at 12 months and 75% at 24 months post-treatment.

Conclusion The device restored FMR in the upper extremities in patients with peripheral nerve or spinal cord injuries.

Level of Evidence Therapeutic IV

KeywoRds

nerve reconstruction - epineurium - nerve transfer - upper extremity

Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 15. Dezember 2023

Angenommen: 29. Januar 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. April 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Li NY, Onor GI, Lemme NJ, Gil JA. Epidemiology of peripheral nerve injuries in sports, exercise, and recreation in the United States, 2009 - 2018. Phys Sportsmed 2021; 49 (03) 355-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kouyoumdjian JA, Graça CR, Ferreira VFM. Peripheral nerve injuries: a retrospective survey of 1124 cases. Neurol India 2017; 65 (03) 551-555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Devi BI, Konar SK, Bhat DI, Shukla DP, Bharath R, Gopalakrishnan MS. Predictors of surgical outcomes of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries in children: an institutional experience. Pediatr Neurosurg 2018; 53 (02) 94-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Daly W, Yao L, Zeugolis D, Windebank A, Pandit A. A biomaterials approach to peripheral nerve regeneration: bridging the peripheral nerve gap and enhancing functional recovery. J R Soc Interface 2012; 9 (67) 202-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ciaramitaro P, Mondelli M, Logullo F. et al; Italian Network for Traumatic Neuropathies. Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries: epidemiological findings, neuropathic pain and quality of life in 158 patients. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2010; 15 (02) 120-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lundborg G, Richard P. Richard P. Bunge memorial lecture. Nerve injury and repair–a challenge to the plastic brain. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2003; 8 (04) 209-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Siemionow M, Brzezicki G. Chapter 8: current techniques and concepts in peripheral nerve repair. Int Rev Neurobiol 2009; 87: 141-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lundborg G. A 25-year perspective of peripheral nerve surgery: evolving neuroscientific concepts and clinical significance. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25 (03) 391-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Johnson EO, Zoubos AB, Soucacos PN. Regeneration and repair of peripheral nerves. Injury 2005; 36 (Suppl. 04) S24-S29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Grinsell D, Keating CP. Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 698256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dy CJ, Aunins B, Brogan DM. Barriers to epineural scarring: role in treatment of traumatic nerve injury and chronic compressive neuropathy. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (04) 360-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ducic I, Safa B, DeVinney E. Refinements of nerve repair with connector-assisted coaptation. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (03) 256-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dahlin LB, Lundborg G. Use of tubes in peripheral nerve repair. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2001; 12 (02) 341-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Brogan DM, Dy CJ, Rioux-Forker D, Wever J, Leversedge FJ. Influences of repair site tension and conduit splinting on peripheral nerve reconstruction. Hand (N Y) 2022; 17 (06) 1048-1054
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Den Dunnen WF, Van der Lei B, Schakenraad JM. et al. Long-term evaluation of nerve regeneration in a biodegradable nerve guide. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (08) 508-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Huang YC, Huang YY. Biomaterials and strategies for nerve regeneration. Artif Organs 2006; 30 (07) 514-522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Molander H, Engkvist O, Hägglund J, Olsson Y, Torebjörk E. Nerve repair using a polyglactin tube and nerve graft: an experimental study in the rabbit. Biomaterials 1983; 4 (04) 276-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE. An alternative to the classical nerve graft for the management of the short nerve gap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82 (05) 849-856
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dienstknecht T, Klein S, Vykoukal J. et al. Type I collagen nerve conduits for median nerve repairs in the forearm. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (06) 1119-1124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Safa B, Jain S, Desai MJ. et al. Peripheral nerve repair throughout the body with processed nerve allografts: results from a large multicenter study. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (05) 527-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Leckenby JI, Furrer C, Haug L, Juon Personeni B, Vögelin E. A retrospective case series reporting the outcomes of Avance nerve allografts in the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 368e-381e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Peltonen S, Alanne M, Peltonen J. Barriers of the peripheral nerve. Tissue Barriers 2013; 1 (03) e24956
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Millesi H, Zöch G, Reihsner R. Mechanical properties of peripheral nerves. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (314) 76-83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Stolinski C. Structure and composition of the outer connective tissue sheaths of peripheral nerve. J Anat 1995; 186 (Pt 1): 123-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mason S, Phillips JB. An ultrastructural and biochemical analysis of collagen in rat peripheral nerves: the relationship between fibril diameter and mechanical properties. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2011; 16 (03) 261-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bozkurt A, Dunda SE, Mon O'Dey D, Brook GA, Suschek CV, Pallua N. Epineurial sheath tube (EST) technique: an experimental peripheral nerve repair model. Neurol Res 2011; 33 (10) 1010-1015
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lubiatowski P, Unsal FM, Nair D, Ozer K, Siemionow M. The epineural sleeve technique for nerve graft reconstruction enhances nerve recovery. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (03) 160-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nawrotek K, Tylman M, Rudnicka K, Balcerzak J, Kamiński K. Chitosan-based hydrogel implants enriched with calcium ions intended for peripheral nervous tissue regeneration. Carbohydr Polym 2016; 136: 764-771
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Nawrotek K, Tylman M, Rudnicka K, Gatkowska J, Wieczorek M. Epineurium-mimicking chitosan conduits for peripheral nervous tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym 2016; 152: 119-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pletikosa Z. Sutureless Repair of Transected Nerves using Photochemically Bonded Collagen Membranes. Sydney: University of Western Sydney; 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 31 (Britain) MRCG. Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System. London: HMSO; 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Roganovic Z, Pavlicevic G. Difference in recovery potential of peripheral nerves after graft repairs. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (03) 621-633 , discussion 621–633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Paternostro-Sluga T, Grim-Stieger M, Posch M. et al. Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40 (08) 665-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Two-point discrimination tester. J Hand Surg Am 1985; 10 (6 Pt 1): 906-907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Novak CB, Katz J. Neuropathic pain in patients with upper-extremity nerve injury. Physiother Can 2010; 62 (03) 190-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Austin PJ, Wu A, Moalem-Taylor G. Chronic constriction of the sciatic nerve and pain hypersensitivity testing in rats. J Vis Exp 2012; (61) 3393
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Guida F, De Gregorio D, Palazzo E. et al. Behavioral, biochemical and electrophysiological changes in spared nerve injury model of neuropathic pain. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21 (09) 3396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Garg R, Merrell GA, Hillstrom HJ, Wolfe SW. Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: a systematic review and analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (09) 819-829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ali ZS, Heuer GG, Faught RW. et al. Upper brachial plexus injury in adults: comparative effectiveness of different repair techniques. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (01) 195-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Poppler LH, Ee X, Schellhardt L. et al. Axonal growth arrests after an increased accumulation of Schwann cells expressing senescence markers and stromal cells in acellular nerve allografts. Tissue Eng Part A 2016; 22 (13-14): 949-961
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Domeshek LF, Novak CB, Patterson JMM. et al. Nerve transfers—a paradigm shift in the reconstructive ladder. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (06) e2290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Yang LJ, Chang KW, Chung KC. A systematic review of nerve transfer and nerve repair for the treatment of adult upper brachial plexus injury. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (02) 417-429 , discussion 429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Texakalidis P, Hardcastle N, Tora MS, Boulis NM. Functional restoration of elbow flexion in nonobstetric brachial plexus injuries: a meta-analysis of nerve transfers versus grafts. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (02) 261-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Sallam AA, El-Deeb MS, Imam MA. Nerve transfer versus nerve graft for reconstruction of high ulnar nerve injuries. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (04) 265-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Bhandari PS, Deb P. Management of isolated musculocutaneous injury: comparing double fascicular nerve transfer with conventional nerve grafting. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (10) 2003-2006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 van Zyl N, Hill B, Cooper C, Hahn J, Galea MP. Expanding traditional tendon-based techniques with nerve transfers for the restoration of upper limb function in tetraplegia: a prospective case series. Lancet 2019; 394 (10198): 565-575
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar