Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779711
Effect of Medial Opening Wedge and External Rotational Humeral Osteotomies on Medial Elbow Compartment Pressure: An Ex Vivo Study
Funding This study was funded by Fusion Implants, United Kingdom.

Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to assess if the level of osteotomy (50 or 75% the length of the humerus), osteotomy angle (5, 10, or 20 degrees), direction of bone alteration (external rotational or medial opening wedge osteotomies), or orientation of osteotomy (perpendicular to the humeral long axis or perpendicular to the weight-bearing axis of the limb) affect pressure through the medial compartment of the elbow.
Study Design Humeral osteotomies were performed at 50 and 75% the length of the humerus on 12 canine cadaver thoracic limbs and patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) printed plates applied to induce the desired alteration. Sensors were placed into the medial and lateral aspects of the elbow joint and the limb compressed to 90 N in a universal testing system.
Results Increasing the angle of the induced change had a significant effect on the decreased load through the medial compartment. Performing the osteotomy at 75% of humeral length from proximal was significantly more effective at reducing the medial elbow load than performing it at 50%. Opening wedge osteotomies were more effective than external rotational osteotomies, but both were effective. Changing the direction of the osteotomy (comparing transverse to oblique) did not significantly affect the load reduction through the medial compartment.
Conclusion Performing an osteotomy at a more distal location along the humerus and increasing the angle of the induced change increased the effectiveness of load-shifting humeral osteotomies.
Authors' Contribution
E.C. contributed to the study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, and writing of the initial manuscript. A.B. contributed to conception of the study, study design, acquisition of data, and data analysis and interpretation. T.W.M. contributed to data analysis and interpretation. D.J. contributed to conception of the study, study design, and data analysis and interpretation. M.B.W. contributed to conception of the study, study design, and data analysis and interpretation. All the authors revised and approved the manuscript before submitting.
Publication History
Received: 11 April 2023
Accepted: 12 January 2024
Article published online:
23 February 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany