PDF herunterladen
Facial Plast Surg 2025; 41(01): 12-20
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779626
Original Article

Trials, Tribulations, and Techniques for Transitioning to an Extended Deep Plane Facelift for All Patients: Insight from a Very Experienced Surgeon's Perspective

Edwin F. Williams III
1   The Williams Center for Plastic Surgery, Latham, New York
,
Matthew J. Urban
1   The Williams Center for Plastic Surgery, Latham, New York
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The extended deep plane facelift is a powerful technique to correct aging of the midface and neck. After many years of superficial muscular aponeurotic system lift techniques, the senior author transitioned to an extended deep plane facelift for all patients. The primary catalyst for this shift in practice was the pursuit of superior rejuvenation of the midface. Consistent uniform elevation of the deep plane with complete ligament release and management of the soft tissue flap were the most significant challenges in the early adoption period. Navigating the transition was facilitated by consultation with experienced colleagues and frequent cadaver dissections. This manuscript details the authors' current technique. Complications and recovery from this technique are similar to those reported with historical techniques and are minimized with proper preparation, precision, and perioperative management. In our experience the results from this procedure are extremely reproducible, durable, and natural, and patients are overwhelmingly extremely satisfied.

Keywords

extended deep plane - facelift - facial aging - complications - technique

Update in Facial Rejuvenation 2024–The Experts Perspective




Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Februar 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Luu NN, Friedman O. Facelift surgery: history, anatomy, and recent innovations. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (05) 556-563
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hamra ST. Building the composite face lift: a personal odyssey. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (01) 85-96
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Jacono A, Bryant LM. Extended deep plane facelift: incorporating facial retaining ligament release and composite flap shifts to maximize midface, jawline and neck rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 527-554
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Lee DD, Lee KW, Williams III EF. A comprehensive approach to midface rejuvenation: our philosophy, algorithm, and surgical technique. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (02) 160-167
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Mani M. Total composite flap facelift and the deep-plane transition zone: a critical consideration in SMAS-release midface lifting. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (05) 533-545
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Setzen G, Williams III EF. Tissue response to suture materials implanted subcutaneously in a rabbit model. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (07) 1788-1795
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Ireton JE, Unger JG, Rohrich RJ. The role of wound healing and its everyday application in plastic surgery: a practical perspective and systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2013; 1 (01) 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Kamer FM, Frankel AS. SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: an objective comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 878-881
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Jacono AA, Parikh SS. The minimal access deep plane extended vertical facelift. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (08) 874-890
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Jacono AA, Alemi AS, Russell JL. A meta-analysis of complication rates among different SMAS facelift techniques. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (09) 927-942
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar