CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779593
Case Report

Reading and Writing Impairment in Persons with Crossed Aphasia: A Comparative Study

1   Department of Speech and Hearing, Father Muller College, University of Mangalore, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Deepak Puttanna
1   Department of Speech and Hearing, Father Muller College, University of Mangalore, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Yashaswini Channabasavegowda
2   Department of Speech Language Pathology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, University of Mysore, Mysore, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Persons with aphasia (PWAs) manifest multifaceted deficits like auditory comprehension, spoken language, reading, and writing to varying degrees. Of these, the most debilitating signs are reading and writing impairment. Of late, PWAs express greater interest to improve their reading and writing skills. The deficits in these skills along with deficits in spoken language limit their participation in the community. Reading and writing may be altered contrarily in various stroke conditions across the left and right hemisphere lesions, just like how linguistic impairments are mutually exclusive. Thus, it must be rational to reconcile the possible role of the right hemisphere to process reading and writing inversely alike spoken abilities. Additionally, investigations on reading and writing deficits in left cerebrovascular atrophy (CVA) aphasics and right CVA aphasics (crossed aphasia) are seldom reported in the literature with relevance to Indian population focusing Indian languages. The study aims to compare reading and writing abilities across PWAs with left CVA and right CVA (crossed aphasia).

Methodology The study recruited four native Kannada speaking PWAs (6 months poststroke) aged between 40 and 70 years with impaired linguistic abilities secondary to stroke through convenient sampling. Western Aphasia Battery-Kannada was administered to identify aphasic component, specifically to evaluate the language, reading, and writing aspects in detail and the scores were analyzed based on the scoring.

Results Descriptive statistics revealed both left and crossed PWAs performed equipotent on linguistics tasks. However, reading abilities were better in left CVA individuals and writing was better in crossed PWAs on comparing the mean scores. Correlation analysis revealed positive correlation between language and reading-writing abilities of left CVA PWAs. Negative correlation was evinced in crossed PWAs. Hence, reading and writing difficulties in crossed aphasia can be mostly ascribed to impairment in peripheral mechanisms involved in visual and/or kinesthetic information processing as the right hemisphere is most viable to these processes.

Conclusion The study highlights the unique pattern of reading and writing abilities in crossed aphasia condition. However, careful examination of dissociations in acquired spoken language and written language abilities across differential neuronal networks through larger samples in the future research is warranted.



Publication History

Article published online:
09 April 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Fridriksson J, Hillis AE. Current approaches to the treatment of post-stroke aphasia. J Stroke 2021; 23 (02) 183-201
  • 2 Semenza C, Delazer M, Bertella L. et al. Is math lateralised on the same side as language? Right hemisphere aphasia and mathematical abilities. Neurosci Lett 2006; 406 (03) 285-288
  • 3 Torrisi M, Pollicino P, Corallo F. et al. A case report on crossed aphasia in dextrals: consideration about clinical features and neural network. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (43) e17660
  • 4 Basso A, Capitani E, Laiacona M, Zanobio ME. Crossed aphasia: one or more syndromes?. Cortex 1985; 21 (01) 25-45
  • 5 Brookshire CE, Wilson JP, Nadeau SE, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Kendall DL. Frequency, nature, and predictors of alexia in a convenience sample of individuals with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology 2014; 28 (12) 1464-1480
  • 6 Webster J, Morris J, Malone J, Howard D. Reading comprehension difficulties in people with aphasia: investigating personal perception of reading ability, practice, and difficulties. Aphasiology 2021; 35 (06) 805-823
  • 7 Chengappa SK, Kumar R. Normative & clinical data on the Kannada version of Western Aphasia Battery (WAB-K). Language in India. 2008; 8: 1-15
  • 8 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12 (03) 189-198
  • 9 Coppens P, Hungerford S, Yamaguchi S, Yamadori A. Crossed aphasia: an analysis of the symptoms, their frequency, and a comparison with left-hemisphere aphasia symptomatology. Brain Lang 2002; 83 (03) 425-463
  • 10 Kjellén E, Laakso K, Henriksson I. Aphasia and literacy-the insider's perspective. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2017; 52 (05) 573-584
  • 11 Cistola G, Farrús M, van der Meulen I. Aphasia and acquired reading impairments: what are the high-tech alternatives to compensate for reading deficits?. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2021; 56 (01) 161-173
  • 12 Knollman-Porter K, Wallace SE, Hux K, Brown J, Long C. Reading experiences and use of supports by people with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology 2015; 29 (12) 1448-1472
  • 13 Buklina SB, Kaftanov AN, Melikyan AG, Kopachev DN, Batalov AI. [Crossed aphasia in neurosurgical practice: case report and literature review]. Vopr Neirokhir 2022; 86 (01) 103-111