Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2018; 127(03): 76-81
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-102281
CME-Fortbildung
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Das MARC-SYSTEM: Anwendungsfehler bei der Polymerisation erkennen?

Katharina Konerding
,
Bernd W. Sigusch
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 March 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Der Leser soll nach dem Durcharbeiten des Artikels
▪ für die Einflussfaktoren beim Einsatz von Polymerisationslampen bzw. Light curing Units (LCU) sensibilisiert sein,
▪ ein geschärftes Bewusstsein für die klinisch korrekte Anwendung während der Polymerisation von lichthärtenden Füllungsmaterialien haben,
▪ mögliche anwendungsbedingte Fehlerquellen bei der Polymerisation kennen, um das zahnärztliche Praxispersonal entsprechend schulen und einweisen zu können und
▪ regelmäßig den Lichtleiter der Polymerisationslampe (LCU) auf mögliche Verschmutzungen und Defekte kontrollieren.
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Brambilla E, Gagliani M, Ionescu A. et al. The influence of light-curing time on the bacterial colonization of resin composite surfaces. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1067-1072
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Price RB, Felix CM, Whalen JM. Factors affecting the energy delivered to simulated class I and class v preparations. J Can Dent Assoc 2010; 76: a94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Corciolani G, Vichi A, Davidson CL. et al. The influence of tip geometry and distance on light-curing efficacy. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 325-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Price RB, Labrie D, Rueggeberg FA. et al. Correlation between the beam profile from a curing light and the microhardness of four resins. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 1345-1357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sigusch BW, Völpel A, Braun I. et al. Influence of different light curing units on the cytotoxicity of various dental composites. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1342-1348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Konerding KL, Heyder M, Kranz S. et al. Study of energy transfer by different light curing units into a class III restoration as a function of tilt angle and distance, using a MARC Patient Simulator (PS). Dent Mater 2016; 32: 676-686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Price R, Watts JL, Barghi DC. et al. Effective use of dental curing lights: A guide for the dental practitioner. ZMK 2014; 4: 12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Price RB, McLeod ME, Felix CM. Quantifying light energy delivered to a Class I restoration. J Can Dent Assoc 2010; 76: a23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Koupis NS, Martens LC, Verbeeck RM. Relative curing degree of polyacid-modified and conventional resin composites determined by surface Knoop hardness. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 1045-1050
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bauer H, Ilie N. Effects of aging and irradiation time on the properties of a highly translucent resin-based composite. Dent Mater J 2013; 32: 592-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Thomé T, Steagall jr. W, Tachibana A. et al. Influence of the distance of the curing light source and composite shade on hardness of two composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2007; 15: 486-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sigusch BW, Pflaum T, Völpel A. et al. Resin-composite cytotoxicity varies with shade and irradiance. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 312-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fan PL, Schumacher RM, Azzolin K. et al. Curing-light intensity and depth of cure of resin-based composites tested according to international standards. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133: 429-434 quiz 491–493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rueggeberg FA, Cole MA, Looney SW. et al. Comparison of manufacturer-recommended exposure durations with those determined using biaxial flexure strength and scraped composite thickness among a variety of light-curing units. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009; 21: 43-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Vandewalle KS, Roberts HW, Rueggeberg FA. Power distribution across the face of different light guides and its effect on composite surface microhardness. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008; 20: 108-117 discussion 118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Alves EB, Alonso RC, Correr GM. et al. Transdental photo-activation technique: hardness and marginal adaptation of composite restorations using different light sources. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 421-425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Scott BA, Felix CA, Price RB. Effect of disposable infection control barriers on light output from dental curing lights. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70: 105-110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kakaboura A, Tzoutzas J, Pitsinigos D. et al. The effect of sterilization methods on the light transmission characteristics and structure of light-curing tips. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 918-923
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ernst CP, Busemann I, Kern T. et al. Feldtest zur Lichtemissionsleistung von Polymerisationsgeräten in zahnärztlichen Praxen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2006; 61: 466-471
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Felix CA, Price RB, Andreou P. Effect of reduced exposure times on the microhardness of 10 resin composites cured by high-power LED and QTH curing lights. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72: 147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Santini A, Watterson C, Miletic V. Temperature rise within the pulp chamber during composite resin polymerisation using three different light sources. Open Dent J 2008; 2: 137-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ward JD, Wolf BJ, Leite LP. et al. Clinical effect of reducing curing times with high-intensity LED lights. Angle Orthod 2015; 85: 1064-1069
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Halvorson RH, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Energy dependent polymerization of resin-based composite. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 463-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jandt KD, Sigusch BW. Future perspectives of resin-based dental materials. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1001-1006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar