CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2024; 15(01): 4-9
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778073
Research Article

Retained Biliary Plastic Stents: Clinical Presentation, Complications, and Management

1   Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Aditya Kale*
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Shashank Pujalwar
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Arun Vaidya
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Sidharth Harindranath
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Ankita Singh
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Vaibhav Padole
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Jitendra Yadav
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Akash Shukla
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Biliary plastic stent (PS) mandates timely removal or replacement. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had affected the accessibility to medical therapy resulting in delay. We evaluated the burden of retained biliary PS, clinical profile, and impact of COVID-19 pandemic on stent retention.

Material and Method Endoscopy database records between November 2019 and April 2022 were reviewed retrospectively to identify patients who had undergone stent exchange or removal > 3 months, that is, retained stents. Demography, comorbidity, indication and outcomes of index endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, size and duration of indwelling biliary PS, clinical presentation, imaging findings, cholangiography findings, stent-related complications, and stone formation and endotherapy details were noted.

Results A total of 252 patients (100 [39.68%] males; median age 47 years [interquartile range [IQR] 32–56 years]) had common bile duct (CBD) stent retention. Median duration of retained CBD stent was 5 months (IQR = 4–6 months). Seventy (27.8%) were symptomatic with cholangitis (22, 8.7%), only jaundice (16, 6.3%), and only biliary abdominal pain (32, 12.7%). Sixty-one of 70 (87.1%) had abnormal imaging; 59/70 (84.3%) had new onset biliary stone or sludge (p ≤ 0.005). Stent retention > 6 months was significantly associated with stent fragmentation (0 vs. 20, p < 0.005) and choledocholithiasis (9 vs. 58, p < 0.005). Small caliber stent retention was more symptomatic (7 vs. 10 French [12/28 [42.85%] vs. 58/224 [25%], p = 0.049]). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase levels, and CBD stent retention > 6 months were significantly associated with complications. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, serum AST > 2× upper limit normal (odds ratio [OR] = 5.487, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.1–9.9, p ≤ 0.005) and CBD stent retention > 6 months (OR = 8.6, CI = 3.1–23.92, p ≤ 0.005) were associated with complications. Out of 101 COVID-19 pandemic-attributed delay, 56/101 (55.44%) had symptomatic stent dysfunction. Endoscopic technical success rate was 97%, unsuccessful ones were due to large stones and impacted stents; with no mortality.

Conclusion CBD PS stent retention, although mostly asymptomatic, can result in significant morbidity like jaundice, cholangitis, stent migration, fragmentation, or impaction in one-fourth of patients. Use of 7 Fr stent, retention duration > 6 months, abnormal imaging findings, and AST > twice the upper limit were significantly associated with complications. Endoscopic management was successful in 97% of patients.

* Co-first authors




Publication History

Article published online:
22 April 2024

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L. et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2019; 51 (05) 472-491
  • 2 Bagul A, Pollard C, Dennison AR. A review of problems following insertion of biliary stents illustrated by an unusual complication. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92 (04) W27–31
  • 3 Odabasi M, Arslan C, Akbulut S. et al. Long-term effects of forgotten biliary stents: a case series and literature review. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014; 7 (08) 2045-2052
  • 4 Jaleel R, Simon EG, Gupta P, Patnaik I, David D, Chowdhury SD. Retained biliary plastic stents - lest we forget. Trop Doct 2021; 51 (02) 177-180
  • 5 Sohn SH, Park JH, Kim KH, Kim TN. Complications and management of forgotten long-term biliary stents. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23 (04) 622-628
  • 6 Duman AE, Yılmaz H, Hülagü S. Biliary stents are forgotten more frequently in elderly patients. Turk J Med Sci 2021; 51 (06) 3067-3072
  • 7 Costa L, Bracco P, Vada S, Trossarelli L, Jacobson K. A chemical analysis of the clogging process of polymeric biliary endoprostheses. Biomaterials 2001; 22 (23) 3113-3119
  • 8 Donelli G, Guaglianone E, Di Rosa R, Fiocca F, Basoli A. Plastic biliary stent occlusion: factors involved and possible preventive approaches. Clin Med Res 2007; 5 (01) 53-60
  • 9 Kumar S, Chandra A, Kulkarni R, Maurya AP, Gupta V. Forgotten biliary stents: ignorance is not bliss. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (01) 191-195
  • 10 Döbrönte Z, Patai A. Fokozott mütéti kockázatú betegek nagy epeúti köveinek palliatív kezelése endoscopos endoprothesis implantatióval. [Palliative treatment of large bile duct stones by endoscopic implantation of endoprosthesis in high risk patients] Orv Hetil 1996; 137 (09) 461-464
  • 11 Leung JW, Ling TK, Kung JL, Vallance-Owen J. The role of bacteria in the blockage of biliary stents. Gastrointest Endosc 1988; 34 (01) 19-22
  • 12 De Palma GD, Galloro G, Siciliano S, Magno L, Catanzano C. Risultati dell'utilizzo di protesi per via endoscopica nel trattamento della litiasi difficile della via biliare principale. [Results of the use of endoprostheses in the treatment of retained common bile duct stones] Minerva Chir 2000; 55 (12) 823-827
  • 13 Soderlund C, Linder S. Covered metal versus plastic stents for malignant common bile duct stenosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63 (07) 986-995
  • 14 Walter D, van Boeckel PG, Groenen MJ. et al. Cost efficacy of metal stents for palliation of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction in a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2015; 149 (01) 130-138
  • 15 Pisello F, Geraci G, Li Volsi F, Modica G, Sciumè C. Permanent stenting in “unextractable” common bile duct stones in high risk patients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008; 393 (06) 857-863
  • 16 Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Tijssen JG, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Biliary endoprostheses in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable common bile duct stones: report on 117 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42 (03) 195-201
  • 17 Lawrence C, Romagnuolo J, Payne KM, Hawes RH, Cotton PB. Low symptomatic premature stent occlusion of multiple plastic stents for benign biliary strictures: comparing standard and prolonged stent change intervals. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72 (03) 558-563
  • 18 Moesch C, Sautereau D, Cessot F. et al. Physicochemical and bacteriological analysis of the contents of occluded biliary endoprostheses. Hepatology 1991; 14 (06) 1142-1146
  • 19 Kaneko J, Kawata K, Watanabe S. et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for stent-stone complex formation following biliary plastic stent placement in patients with common bile duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018; 25 (10) 448-454 Lexicon grading Kaneko
  • 20 Freitas M, Lima Capela T, Macedo Silva V. et al. Real-life patency of plastic biliary stents in the pandemic era: is stent removal after 6 months safe and effective?. Scand J Gastroenterol 2023; 58 (07) 798-804