Download PDF
J Wrist Surg 2024; 13(04): 346-351
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777734
Scientific Article

A Comparison of Rib Osteochondral Graft to Medial Femoral Trochlear Osteocartilaginous Graft for the Salvage of the Fragmented Scaphoid Proximal Pole: A Single-Center Experience with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Stephen Butler
1   Victorian Hand Surgery Associates, Fitzroy, Australia
,
John Galbraith
2   Hand Unit, Dandenong Hospital, Dandenong, Australia
,
Eugene T. H. Ek
2   Hand Unit, Dandenong Hospital, Dandenong, Australia
3   Hand and Wrist Biomechanics Laboratory, O'Brien Institute at St. Vincent's Institute, Melbourne, Australia
,
Anthony Berger
1   Victorian Hand Surgery Associates, Fitzroy, Australia
4   Department Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, St.Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
,
David McCombe
1   Victorian Hand Surgery Associates, Fitzroy, Australia
3   Hand and Wrist Biomechanics Laboratory, O'Brien Institute at St. Vincent's Institute, Melbourne, Australia
4   Department Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, St.Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
5   Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
,
Stephen K. Tham 
1   Victorian Hand Surgery Associates, Fitzroy, Australia
2   Hand Unit, Dandenong Hospital, Dandenong, Australia
3   Hand and Wrist Biomechanics Laboratory, O'Brien Institute at St. Vincent's Institute, Melbourne, Australia
4   Department Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, St.Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
› Author Affiliations Funding The authors acknowledge funding from the Victorian Hand Surgery Associates Research Fund. The research fund did not exert influence over any aspects of the study.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose Fragmented fractures of the proximal pole of the scaphoid that cannot be internally fixed may be salvaged by four-corner arthrodesis or proximal row carpectomy. Replacement of the proximal scaphoid with costal-osteochondral graft (COG) or the medial femoral trochlea (MFT) graft are two alternative solutions for this clinical presentation. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of the COG and the MFT graft with a minimum 2-year follow-up from a single centre.

Methods A retrospective study was performed to investigate the outcome of COG and MFT with a minimum 2 year follow up. Demographic data and clinical assessment including wrist range of motion and grip strength measurements and Oxford Knee score were collected. Patients completed the outcome measures of Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and a ten-point visual analogue score for pain (VAS). Radiological examination was performed on all wrists at follow-up.

Results The visual analogue score, DASH and PRWE were similar between the two groups. There was radiographic evidence of arthritis between the radial styloid and distal scaphoid in all patients that underwent COG but no evidence in those that underwent MFT graft reconstruction. There were different complications in each group. Thirty percent of patients that underwent MFT reconstruction had persistent knee pain at follow up.

Conclusion Though there are notable differences in the follow-up period, patients undergoing MFT risk developing knee pain, while those undergoing COG risk radiographic progression of wrist arthritis.

Level of Evidence III – Comparative study.

Keywords

scaphoid - proximal pole - costal-osteochondral - rib graft - medial femoral trochlea

Ethical Approval

This study received approval from the institutional ethics review board, St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne) HREC. Approval number LRR 072/20.


Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all volunteers as per institutional ethics review board protocol.




Publication History

Received: 20 June 2023

Accepted: 21 November 2023

Article published online:
22 December 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Vender MI, Watson HK, Wiener BD, Black DM. Degenerative change in symptomatic scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am 1987; 12 (04) 514-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Berkhout MJ, Bachour Y, Zheng KH, Mullender MG, Strackee SD, Ritt MJ. Four-corner arthrodesis versus proximal row carpectomy: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 17 years. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (07) 1349-1354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wagner ER, Werthel JD, Elhassan BT, Moran SL. Proximal row carpectomy and 4-corner arthrodesis in patients younger than age 45 years. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (06) 428-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wall LB, Didonna ML, Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. Proximal row carpectomy: minimum 20-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (08) 1498-1504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Eaton RG, Akelman E, Eaton BH. Fascial implant arthroplasty for treatment of radioscaphoid degenerative disease. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (05) 766-774
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Carter PR, Malinin TI, Abbey PA, Sommerkamp TG. The scaphoid allograft: a new operation for treatment of the very proximal scaphoid nonunion or for the necrotic, fragmented scaphoid proximal pole. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (01) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Herbert TJ, Lanzetta M. Idiopathic avascular necrosis of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg [Br] 1994; 19 (02) 174-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gras M, Wahegaonkar AL, Mathoulin C. Treatment of avascular necrosis of the proximal pole of the scaphoid by arthroscopic resection and prosthetic semireplacement arthroplasty using the pyrocarbon adaptive proximal scaphoid implant (APSI): long-term functional outcomes. J Wrist Surg 2012; 1 (02) 159-164
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Poumellec MA, Camuzard O, Pequignot JP, Dreant N. Adaptive proximal scaphoid implant: indications and long-term results. J Wrist Surg 2019; 8 (04) 344-350
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bürger HK, Windhofer C, Gaggl AJ, Higgins JP. Vascularized medial femoral trochlea osteocartilaginous flap reconstruction of proximal pole scaphoid nonunions. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (04) 690-700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sandow MJ. Proximal scaphoid costo-osteochondral replacement arthroplasty. J Hand Surg [Br] 1998; 23 (02) 201-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Elhassan B, Noureldin M, Kakar S. Proximal scaphoid pole reconstruction utilizing ipsilateral proximal hamate autograft. Hand (N Y) 2016; 11 (04) 495-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Capito AE, Higgins JP. Scaphoid overstuffing: the effects of the dimensions of scaphoid reconstruction on scapholunate alignment. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (12) 2419-2425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M, Roth JH. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma 1998; 12 (08) 577-586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [corrected]. Am J Ind Med 1996; 29 (06) 602-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K. et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (08) 1010-1014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Larsen CF, Mathiesen FK, Lindequist S. Measurements of carpal bone angles on lateral wrist radiographs. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16 (05) 888-893
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Nattrass GR, King GJ, McMurtry RY, Brant RF. An alternative method for determination of the carpal height ratio. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76 (01) 88-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Haussman P. Long-term results after silicone prosthesis replacement of the proximal pole of the scaphoid bone in advanced scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg [Br] 2002; 27 (05) 417-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Veitch S, Blake SM, David H. Proximal scaphoid rib graft arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (02) 196-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Yao J, Read B, Hentz VR. The fragmented proximal pole scaphoid nonunion treated with rib autograft: case series and review of the literature. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (11) 2188-2192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Zechmann-Mueller NA, Collocott S, Heiss-Dunlop W. Costo-osteochondral graft (rib graft) reconstruction of the irreparable proximal scaphoid. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020; 45 (07) 693-699
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pet MA, Assi PE, Yousaf IS, Giladi AM, Higgins JP. Outcomes of the medial femoral trochlea osteochondral free flap for proximal scaphoid reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45 (04) 317-326.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Higgins JP, Burger HK. Proximal scaphoid arthroplasty using the medial femoral trochlea flap. J Wrist Surg 2013; 2 (03) 228-233
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Higgins JP, Bürger HK. Osteochondral flaps from the distal femur: expanding applications, harvest sites, and indications. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (07) 483-490
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hugon S, Koninckx A, Barbier O. Vascularized osteochondral graft from the medial femoral trochlea: anatomical study and clinical perspectives. Surg Radiol Anat 2010; 32 (09) 817-825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hill JR, Heckmann N, McKnight B, White EA, Ghiassi A, Patel BA. Medial femoral trochlea osteochondral graft: a quantitative anatomic comparison to the proximal pole of the scaphoid. J Wrist Surg 2020; 9 (04) 283-288
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Windhofer C, Wong VW, Larcher L, Paryavi E, Bürger HK, Higgins JP. Knee donor site morbidity following harvest of medial femoral trochlea osteochondral flaps for carpal reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (05) 610-614.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar