Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2023; 41(01/02): 005-011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777323
Review Article

Breaking Boundaries: Toward Consistent Gender-Sensitive Language in Sexual and Reproductive Health Guidelines

Rhonda M. Garad 
1   Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University and Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
,
Mahnaz Bahri-Khomami 
1   Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University and Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
,
Maureen Busby
2   Department CEO, PCOS Vitality, Ireland, United Kingdom
,
Tania S. Burgert 
3   Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
,
Jacky Boivin 
4   Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, School of Psychology (College of Biomedical and Life Sciences), Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
,
Helena J. Teede 
1   Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University and Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This review assesses gender-sensitive language in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) guidelines, including a guideline for polycystic ovary syndrome. We conducted a systematic search across databases like Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane until July 31, 2023, using terms related to gender-inclusivity, SRH, and guideline protocols. Criteria for inclusion were gender-sensitive language, SRH focus, and guideline relevance, excluding non-English articles or those without policy considerations. Our search yielded 25 studies, with 6 included for qualitative synthesis. Results showed significant gaps in using gender-sensitive language in SRH guidelines. The debate on this language mirrors broader societal discourse. Recognizing gender diversity is essential for research, clinical practices, and societal norms. While promoting inclusion, drawbacks like unintended erasure or miscommunication should also be addressed. A gender-additive approach balances inclusivity and biological accuracy. Precise and inclusive discourse is crucial. Future research should focus on systemic approaches in the SRH sector.

Keywords

gender - gender-sensitive language - sexual and reproductive health - guidelines - sex - health

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Article published online:
05 December 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Department of Health. Clinical practice guidelines. Australian Government. Accessed August 1, 2022 at: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/qupp-review~qupp-clinical-practice-guidelines
    PubMed
  • 2 Caughey AB, Krist AH, Wolff TA. et al. USPSTF approach to addressing sex and gender when making recommendations for clinical preventive services. JAMA 2021; 326 (19) 1953-1961
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Greenhalgh T, Thorne S, Malterud K. Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?. Eur J Clin Invest 2018; 48 (06) e12931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J 2009; 26 (02) 91-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rioux C, Weedon S, London-Nadeau K. et al. Gender-inclusive writing for epidemiological research on pregnancy. J Epidemiol Community Health 2022; 76 (09) 823-827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kirubarajan A, Patel P, Leung S, Park B, Sierra S. Cultural competence in fertility care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer people: a systematic review of patient and provider perspectives. Fertil Steril 2021; 115 (05) 1294-1301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fix L, Durden M, Obedin-Maliver J. et al. Stakeholder perceptions and experiences regarding access to contraception and abortion for transgender, non-binary, and gender-expansive individuals assigned female at birth in the U.S. Arch Sex Behav 2020; 49 (07) 2683-2702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Moseson H, Fix L, Ragosta S. et al. Abortion experiences and preferences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224 (04) 376.e1-376.e11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Likis FE. New aims and scope for the Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health support health equity, sexual and reproductive health, and gender-inclusive language. J Midwifery Womens Health 2019; 64 (04) 369-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gribble KD, Bewley S, Bartick MC. et al. Effective communication about pregnancy, birth, lactation, breastfeeding and newborn care: the importance of sexed language. Front Glob Womens Health 2022; 3: 818856
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Richardson SS. Sex Itself: The Search for Male and Female in the Human Genome. University of Chicago Press; 2019
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Money J, Hampson JG, Hampson JL. An examination of some basic sexual concepts: the evidence of human hermaphroditism. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1955; 97 (04) 301-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Butler J. Gender Trouble. Routledge; 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Rioux C, Paré A, London-Nadeau K. et al. Sex and gender terminology: a glossary for gender-sensitive epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 2022; 76 (08) 764-768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Morrison T, Dinno A, Salmon T. The erasure of intersex, transgender, nonbinary, and agender experiences through misuse of sex and gender in health research. Am J Epidemiol 2021; 190 (12) 2712-2717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wugalter K, Perovic M, Karkaby L, Einstein G. The double-edged sword of PCOS and gender: exploring gender-diverse experiences of polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Transgender Health 2023; 1-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Schweisberger CL, Hornberger L, Barral R. et al. Gender diversity in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2022; 35 (11) 1422-1428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Teede H. International evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome 2023. Accessed August 9, 2023 at: https://www.monash.edu/medicine/mchri/pcos/guideline
    PubMed
  • 19 Dinour LM. Speaking out on “breastfeeding” terminology: recommendations for gender-sensitive language in research and reporting. Breastfeed Med 2019; 14 (08) 523-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kinney R, Praamsma N, Malinowski A, Cassi P, Hennessy E. Testing inclusive language revisions of the breastfeeding attrition prediction tool using cognitive interviewing: a pilot study. J Hum Lact 2023; 39 (03) 529-539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pendleton J. (En) Gendering the word ‘midwife’: semantics, etymology, and orientations. J Gend Stud 2022; 31 (05) 560-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hopper PJ, Traugott EC. Grammaticalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Silver A. Birth beyond the binary| AIMS. AIMS Journal. 2019; 31 (02) 15-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Green H, Riddington A. Gender-Sensitive Language in Perinatal Services: Mission Statement and Rationale. Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals; 2020
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Dahlen S. Do We Need the Word ‘Woman’ in Healthcare?. Oxford University Press; 2021: 483-484
    Google Scholar