CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · South Asian J Cancer 2024; 13(02): 099-105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776789
Original Article
Gastrointestinal Cancer

Colorectal Origin: A Marker of Favorable Outcome in Krukenberg Tumor? Results from Clinical and Prognostic Analysis

Purnima Thakur
1   Department of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
,
2   Department of Radiotherapy, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar Government Medical College, Nahan, Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh, India
,
Ashish Chauhan
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
,
Kapil M. Pal
1   Department of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
,
Shabnam Thakur
1   Department of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
,
Manish Gupta
1   Department of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
,
Shilpa Kaushal
1   Department of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Zoom Image
Purnima Thakur

This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors affecting the survival of patients suffering from Krukenberg tumor (KT) and also to determine the survival in these patients. A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with KT between January 2015 and December 2021 was conducted at a tertiary cancer center. Clinicopathological variables were scrutinized, and survival analysis was performed. Thirty-six patients were enrolled in this study. The median age at diagnosis was 48 years (ranging from 22 to 71 years). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.6 to 13 months). The mean OS for tumors originating in the colorectal region was longer compared to that for tumors of other sites (15.4 vs. 9 months, respectively; p = 0.048). In univariate analysis, patients who received chemotherapy had better survival, while those presenting with ascites had a poor prognosis. No correlation was observed between age, menstrual status, bilaterality, size of ovarian metastases, extent of metastatic disease, metastasectomy, and survival. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that chemotherapy predicted a favorable survival outcome (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.200, 95% CI: 0.046–0.877, p-value = 0.033). KT is an aggressive tumor with a median OS of less than a year. Chemotherapy may improve survival. Patients with a primary tumor in the colorectal region have a better outcome, while those presenting with ascites indicate a poor prognosis.



Publication History

Article published online:
12 February 2024

© 2024. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Serov SF, Scully RE, Sobin LH. Histologic typing of ovarian tumors In International Histological Classification of Tumors, #9. World Health Organization; Geneva: 1973
  • 2 Saphir O, Parker ML. Metastasis of primary carcinoma of the breast: with special reference to spleen, adrenal glands and ovaries. Arch Surg 1941; 42 (06) 1003-1018
  • 3 Al-Agha OM, Nicastri AD. An in-depth look at Krukenberg tumor: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130 (11) 1725-1730
  • 4 Kiyokawa T, Young RH, Scully RE. Krukenberg tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 120 cases with emphasis on their variable pathologic manifestations. Am J Surg Pathol 2006; 30 (03) 277-299
  • 5 Wu F, Zhao X, Mi B. et al. Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of Krukenberg tumor. Mol Clin Oncol 2015; 3 (06) 1323-1328
  • 6 Ayhan A, Tuncer ZS, Bükülmez O. Malignant tumors metastatic to the ovaries. J Surg Oncol 1995; 60 (04) 268-276
  • 7 Xu KY, Gao H, Lian ZJ, Ding L, Li M, Gu J. Clinical analysis of Krukenberg tumors in patients with colorectal cancer—a review of 57 cases. World J Surg Oncol 2017; 15 (01) 1-7
  • 8 Jeung YJ, Ok HJ, Kim WG, Kim SH, Lee TH. Krukenberg tumors of gastric origin versus colorectal origin. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2015; 58 (01) 32-39
  • 9 Lionetti R, De Luca M, Travaglino A. et al. Treatments and overall survival in patients with Krukenberg tumor. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 300 (01) 15-23
  • 10 Seow-En I, Hwarng G, Tan GHC, Ho LML, Teo MCC. Palliative surgery for Krukenberg tumors - 12-year experience and review of the literature. World J Clin Oncol 2018; 9 (01) 13-19
  • 11 S ST, Krishnan SK, Das P. et al. Descriptive Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Cancers: Results from National Cancer Registry Programme, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2022; 23 (02) 409-418
  • 12 Lionetti R, De Luca M, Travaglino A. et al. Prognostic factors in Krukenberg tumor. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 300 (05) 1155-1165
  • 13 Tan KL, Tan WS, Lim JF, Eu KW. Krukenberg tumors of colorectal origin: a dismal outcome–experience of a tertiary center. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25 (02) 233-238
  • 14 Goéré D, Daveau C, Elias D. et al. The differential response to chemotherapy of ovarian metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34 (12) 1335-1339
  • 15 Taylor AE, Nicolson VM, Cunningham D. Ovarian metastases from primary gastrointestinal malignancies: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience and implications for adjuvant treatment. Br J Cancer 1995; 71 (01) 92-96
  • 16 Kubeček O, Laco J, Špaček J. et al. The pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of metastatic tumors to the ovary: a comprehensive review. Clin Exp Metastasis 2017; 34 (05) 295-307
  • 17 Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Chen J, Kim J, Choi SH, Noh SH. Survival benefit of metastasectomy for Krukenberg tumors from gastric cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 94 (02) 477-482
  • 18 Jiang R, Tang J, Cheng X, Zang RY. Surgical treatment for patients with different origins of Krukenberg tumors: outcomes and prognostic factors. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35 (01) 92-97
  • 19 Rosa F, Marrelli D, Morgagni P. et al. Krukenberg Tumors of Gastric Origin: The Rationale of Surgical Resection and Perioperative Treatments in a Multicenter Western Experience. World J Surg 2016; 40 (04) 921-928
  • 20 Cho JH, Lim JY, Choi AR. et al. Comparison of Surgery Plus Chemotherapy and Palliative Chemotherapy Alone for Advanced Gastric Cancer with Krukenberg Tumor. Cancer Res Treat 2015; 47 (04) 697-705
  • 21 Peng W, Hua R-X, Jiang R. et al. Surgical treatment for patients with Krukenberg tumor of stomach origin: clinical outcome and prognostic factors analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8 (07) e68227
  • 22 Xie H, Erickson BJ, Sheedy SP, Yin J, Hubbard JM. The diagnosis and outcome of Krukenberg tumors. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12 (02) 226-236
  • 23 Huang Z, Li B, Qin H, Mo X. Invasion characteristics and clinical significance of tumor-associated macrophages in gastrointestinal Krukenberg tumors. Front Oncol 2023; 13: 1006183
  • 24 Yu P, Huang L, Cheng G. et al. Treatment strategy and prognostic factors for Krukenberg tumors of gastric origin: report of a 10-year single-center experience from China. Oncotarget 2017; 8 (47) 82558-82570
  • 25 Tai H, Yang Q, Wu Z. et al. PD-L1 Expression Predicts a Distinct Prognosis in Krukenberg Tumor with Corresponding Origins. J Immunol Res 2018; 2018: 9485285