Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775588
Propofol versus Desflurane in Moyamoya Disease Patients—A Pilot Study
Funding Support was provided solely from institutional and/or departmental sources.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00053244/202304/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0043-1775588_2370028-1.jpg)
Abstract
Objectives The choice of inhalational or intravenous anesthetic agents is debatable in neurosurgical patients. Desflurane, a cerebral vasodilator, may be advantageous in ischemic cerebral pathologies. Hence, we planned to compare desflurane and propofol in patients with moyamoya disease (MMD) with the objective of comparing neurological outcomes.
Materials and Methods This prospective pilot trial was initiated after institutional ethics committee approval. Patients with MMD undergoing revascularization surgery were randomized into two groups receiving either desflurane or propofol intraoperatively. Neurological outcomes were assessed using a modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge and an extended Glasgow outcome score (GOS-E) at 1 month. Intraoperative parameters, including hemodynamic parameters, end-tidal carbon dioxide, entropy, intraoperative brain relaxation scores (BRS), and rescue measures for brain relaxation, were compared.
Statistical Analysis The normality of quantitative data was checked using Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests of normality. Normally distributed data were compared using unpaired t-tests, skewed data using Mann–Whitney U tests, and categorical variables using chi-squared tests.
Results A total of 17 patients were randomized, 10 in the desflurane and 7 in the propofol group. mRS (1.3 ± 0.6 and 1.14 ± 0.4, p = 0.450) and GOS-E (6.7 ± 0.6 and 6.85 ± 0.5, p = 0.45) were comparable between desflurane and propofol groups, respectively. BRS was significantly higher in the desflurane group (3.6 ± 0.5) compared to the propofol group (2.1 ± 0.3, p = 0.001), with a significant number of patients requiring rescue measures in the desflurane group (70%, p < 0.001). Other outcome parameters were comparable (p > 0.05).
Conclusion We conclude that postoperative neurological outcomes were comparable with using either an anesthetic agent, desflurane, or propofol in MMD patients undergoing revascularization surgery. Maintenance of anesthesia with propofol had significantly superior surgical field conditions.
Ethical Approval Statement
The original work has been done after approval from Institutional Ethics Committee (No: NK/5730/MD/456) and Helsinki guidelines were followed.
Authors' Contributions
R.R.A., K.J., N.B.P., and H.B. conceptualized and designed the study. K.J., K.K., and A.A. were involved in acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. K.J., K.K., A.B., and R.R.A. helped in manuscript preparation. K.J., K.K., A.A., A.B., N.B.P., and H.B. helped in critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Publication History
Article published online:
07 November 2023
© 2023. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Scott RM, Smith ER. Moyamoya disease and moyamoya syndrome. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (12) 1226-1237
- 2 Kuriyama S, Kusaka Y, Fujimura M. et al. Prevalence and clinicoepidemiological features of moyamoya disease in Japan: findings from a nationwide epidemiological survey. Stroke 2008; 39 (01) 42-47
- 3 Yamauchi T, Tada M, Houkin K. et al. Linkage of familial moyamoya disease (spontaneous occlusion of the circle of Willis) to chromosome 17q25. Stroke 2000; 31 (04) 930-935
- 4 Hallemeier CL, Rich KM, Grubb Jr RL. et al. Clinical features and outcome in North American adults with moyamoya phenomenon. Stroke 2006; 37 (06) 1490-1496
- 5 Wang KC, Phi JH, Lee JY, Kim SK, Cho BK. Indirect revascularization surgery for moyamoya disease in children and its special considerations. Korean J Pediatr 2012; 55 (11) 408-413
- 6 Karasawa J, Kikuchi H, Furuse S, Kawamura J, Sakaki T. Treatment of moyamoya disease with STA-MCA anastomosis. J Neurosurg 1978; 49 (05) 679-688
- 7 Schnider TW, Minto CF, Struys MM, Absalom AR. The safety of target-controlled infusions. Anesth Analg 2016; 122 (01) 79-85
- 8 Krishnakumar M, Ramesh V, Goyal A, Pruthi N. Clinical visualization of cerebral vasodilatation by desflurane. Can J Anaesth/Journal Canadien d'anesthésie 2020; 67 (05) 605-606
- 9 Bhardwaj A, Bhagat H, Grover VK. et al. Comparison of propofol and desflurane for postanaesthetic morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for aneurysmal SAH: a randomized clinical trial. J Anesth 2018; 32 (02) 250-258
- 10 Matta BF, Mayberg TS, Lam AM. Direct cerebrovasodilatory effects of halothane, isoflurane, and desflurane during propofol-induced isoelectric electroencephalogram in humans. Anesthesiology 1995; 83 (05) 980-985 , discussion 27A
- 11 Matta BF, Heath KJ, Tipping K, Summors AC. Direct cerebral vasodilatory effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane. Anesthesiology 1999; 91 (03) 677-680
- 12 Todd MM, Warner DS, Sokoll MD. et al. A prospective, comparative trial of three anesthetics for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Propofol/fentanyl, isoflurane/nitrous oxide, and fentanyl/nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology 1993; 78 (06) 1005-1020
- 13 Haelewyn B, Yvon A, Hanouz JL. et al. Desflurane affords greater protection than halothane against focal cerebral ischaemia in the rat. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91 (03) 390-396
- 14 Tsai SK, Lin SM, Hung WC, Mok MS, Chih CL, Huang SS. The effect of desflurane on ameliorating cerebral infarction in rats subjected to focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Life Sci 2004; 74 (20) 2541-2549
- 15 Kurth CD, Priestley M, Watzman HM, McCann J, Golden J. Desflurane confers neurologic protection for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in newborn pigs. Anesthesiology 2001; 95 (04) 959-964
- 16 Wang Z, Feng F, Ma Y, Wang X, Li H, Li Z. Effect of desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia on balance between cerebral oxygen supply and demand during cerebral revascularization in patients with moyamoya disease. Chin J Anesthesiol 2019; 855-8
- 17 Dube SK, Pandia MP, Chaturvedi A, Bithal P, Dash HH. Comparison of intraoperative brain condition, hemodynamics and postoperative recovery between desflurane and sevoflurane in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. Saudi J Anaesth 2015; 9 (02) 167-173
- 18 Bhagat H, Sharma T, Mahajan S. et al. Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Neurol Int 2021; 12: 300
- 19 Jagdevan S, Sriganesh K, Pandey P, Reddy M, Umamaheswara Rao GS. Anesthetic factors and outcome in children undergoing indirect revascularization procedure for moyamoya disease: an Indian perspective. Neurol India 2015; 63 (05) 702-706
- 20 Preethi J, Bidkar PU, Cherian A. et al. Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia vs. inhalational anesthesia on brain relaxation, intracranial pressure, and hemodynamics in patients with acute subdural hematoma undergoing emergency craniotomy: a randomized control trial. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2021; 47 (03) 831-837
- 21 Prabhakar H, Singh GP, Anand V, Kalaivani M. Mannitol versus hypertonic saline for brain relaxation in patients undergoing craniotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014 (07) CD010026
- 22 Jiang Z, Wu Y, Liang F. et al. Brain relaxation using desflurane anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors: a randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23 (01) 15
- 23 Lebenbom-Mansour MH, Pandit SK, Kothary SP, Randel GI, Levy L. Desflurane versus propofol anesthesia: a comparative analysis in outpatients. Anesth Analg 1993; 76 (05) 936-941