Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(03): 229-240
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775560
SMFM Fellowship Series Article

A Prospective Longitudinal Quality Initiative toward Improved Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Pathways

Liviu Cojocaru 
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Suzanne Alton
2   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Autusa Pahlavan
3   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Martha Coghlan
4   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Hyunuk Seung
5   Department of Pharmacy Practice and Sciences, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Ariel Trilling
6   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, University of Pittsburg School of Medicine, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
,
Bhavani S. Kodali
7   Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Obstetric Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Sarah Crimmins 
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Katherine R. Goetzinger
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) pathways reduces inpatient and outpatient opioid use, pain scores and improves the indicators of postoperative recovery.

Study Design This is a prospective, longitudinal, quality improvement study of all patients older than 18 undergoing an uncomplicated cesarean delivery (CD) at an academic medical center. We excluded complicated CD, patients with chronic pain disorders, chronic opioid use, acute postpartum depression, or mothers whose neonate demised before their discharge. Lastly, we excluded non-English- and non-Spanish-speaking patients. Our study compared patient outcomes before (pre-ERAC) and after (post-ERAC) implementation of ERAC pathways. Primary outcomes were inpatient morphine milligram equivalent (MME) use and the patient's delta pain scores. Secondary outcomes were outpatient MME prescriptions and indicators of postoperative recovery (time to feeding, ambulation, and hospital discharge).

Results Of 308 patients undergoing CD from October 2019 to September 2020, 196 were enrolled in the pre-ERAC cohort and 112 in the post-ERAC cohort. Patients in the pre-ERAC cohort were more likely to require opioids in the postoperative period compared with the post-ERAC cohort (81.6 vs. 64.3%, p < 0.001). Likewise, there was a higher use of MME per stay in the pre-ERAC cohort (30 [20–49] vs. 16.8 MME [11.2–33.9], p < 0.001). There was also a higher number of patients who required prescribed opioids at the time of discharge (98 vs. 86.6%, p < 0.001) as well as in the amount of MMEs prescribed (150 [150–225] vs. 150 MME [112–150], p < 0.001; different shape of distribution). Furthermore, the patients in the pre-ERAC cohort had higher delta pain scores (3.3 [2.3–4.7] vs. 2.2 [1.3–3.7], p < 0.001).

Conclusion Our study has illustrated that our ERAC pathways were associated with reduced inpatient opioid use, outpatient opioid use, patient-reported pain scores, and improved indicators of postoperative recovery.

Key Points

  • Implementation of ERAC pathways is associated with a higher percentage of no postpartum opioid use.

  • Implementation of ERAC pathways is associated with lower delta (reported − expected) pain scores.

  • The results of ERAC pathways implementation are increased by adopting a patient-centered approach.

Keywords

cesarean section - obstetrics - quality of care - maternal health - enhanced recovery after surgery

Authors' Contributions

L.C. drafted the first manuscript. H.S. performed the statistical analysis and ensured its correct interpretation. All authors contributed to the writing, editing, and approval of the final version.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 04 November 2021

Accepted: 18 August 2023

Article published online:
25 September 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Pfuntner AWL, Stocks C. Most Frequent Procedures Performed in U.S. Hospitals, 2010: Statistical Brief #149. 2013 Feb. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Clark SL, Garite TJ, Hamilton EF, Belfort MA, Hankins GD. “Doing something” about the cesarean delivery rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219 (03) 267-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY. et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet 2018; 392 (10155): 1341-1348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Burgansky A, Montalto D, Siddiqui NA. The safe motherhood initiative: the development and implementation of standardized obstetric care bundles in New York. Semin Perinatol 2016; 40 (02) 124-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Patel K, Zakowski M. Enhanced recovery after cesarean: current and emerging trends. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2021; 11 (02) 136-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Matthews KC, White RS, Ewing J, Abramovitz SE, Kalish RB. Enhanced recovery after surgery for cesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative. Am J Perinatol 2022; 38 (S 01): e215-233
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wahl TS, Goss LE, Morris MS. et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) eliminates racial disparities in postoperative length of stay after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2018; 268 (06) 1026-1035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ituk U, Habib AS. Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. F1000 Res 2018; 7: F1000 Faculty Rev-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bollag L, Nelson G. Enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) - beyond the pain scores. Int J Obstet Anesth 2020; 43: 36-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Birchall CL, Maines JL, Kunselman AR, Stetter CM, Pauli JM. Enhanced recovery for cesarean delivery leads to no difference in length of stay, decreased opioid use and lower infection rates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35 (26) 10253-10261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 McCoy JA, Gutman S, Hamm RF, Srinivas SK. The association between implementation of an enhanced recovery after cesarean pathway with standardized discharge prescriptions and opioid use and pain experience after cesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38 (13) 1341-1347
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wollny K, Metcalfe A, Corrigan C. et al. Maternal perceptions of cesarean birth care: a qualitative study to inform ERAS guideline development. Birth 2021; 48 (04) 550-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bateman BT, Franklin JM, Bykov K. et al. Persistent opioid use following cesarean delivery: patterns and predictors among opioid-naïve women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (03) 353.e1-353.e18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Peahl AF, Dalton VK, Montgomery JR, Lai Y-L, Hu HM, Waljee JF. Rates of new persistent opioid use after vaginal or cesarean birth among US women. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (07) e197863-e197863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 VDH. Virginia Department of Health. Pregnancy-associated deaths from drug overdose in Virginia, 1999–2007: a report from the Virginia Maternal Mortality Review Team. Accessed September 17, 2023 at: http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/content/uploads/sites/18/2016/04/Final-Pregnancy-Associated-Deaths-Due-to-Drug-Overdose.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 DHMH. Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Maryland maternal mortality review 2016 annual report. Accessed September 17, 2023 at: https://health.maryland.gov/phpa/Documents/Maryland-Maternal-Mortality-Review-2016-Report.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Patrick SW, Schumacher RE, Benneyworth BD, Krans EE, McAllister JM, Davis MM. Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures: United States, 2000-2009. JAMA 2012; 307 (18) 1934-1940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Smith AM, Young P, Blosser CC, Poole AT. Multimodal stepwise approach to reducing in-hospital opioid use after cesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (04) 700-706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Moore A, Costello J, Wieczorek P, Shah V, Taddio A, Carvalho JC. Gabapentin improves postcesarean delivery pain management: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2011; 112 (01) 167-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Felder L, Saccone G, Scuotto S. et al. Perioperative gabapentin and post cesarean pain control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 233: 98-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 ACOG. ACOG committee opinion no. 750: perioperative pathways: enhanced recovery after surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (03) e120-e130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Stethen TW, Ghazi YA, Heidel RE. et al. Walking to recovery: the effects of missed ambulation events on postsurgical recovery after bowel resection. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9 (05) 953-961
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Macones GA, Caughey AB, Wood SL. et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations (part 3). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221 (03) 247.e1-247.e9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Elias KM, Stone AB, McGinigle K. et al; ERAS® Society and ERAS® USA. The reporting on ERAS compliance, outcomes, and elements research (RECOvER) checklist: a joint statement by the ERAS and ERAS USA societies. World J Surg 2019; 43 (01) 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61 (04) 344-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA. et al. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations (part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219 (06) 533-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wilson RD, Caughey AB, Wood SL. et al. Guidelines for antenatal and preoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations (part 1). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219 (06) 523.e1-523.e15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hedderson M, Lee D, Hunt E. et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery to change process measures and reduce opioid use after cesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134 (03) 511-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Maharaj D. Eating and drinking in labor: should it be allowed?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 146 (01) 3-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Dumoulin JG, Foulkes JE. Ketonuria during labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91 (02) 97-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ludka LM, Roberts CC. Eating and drinking in labor. A literature review. J Nurse Midwifery 1993; 38 (04) 199-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Okutomi T, Kato R. [Preoperative oral hydration for pregnant women]. Masui 2011; 60 (07) 799-806
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ahmed MR, Sayed Ahmed WA, Atwa KA, Metwally L. Timing of urinary catheter removal after uncomplicated total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 176: 60-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Brumfield CG, Sheffield JS, Hauth J, DuBard M, Shannon S. 72-hour discharge after cesarean delivery: results in a selected Medicaid population. J Matern Fetal Med 1998; 7 (02) 72-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Stossel LM, Segar N, Gliatto P, Fallar R, Karani R. Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27 (09) 1165-1170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Commission TJ. Advancing Effective Communication, Cultural Competence, and Patient- and Family-Centered Care: A Roadmap for Hospitals. The Joint Commission; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Poland F, Spalding N, Gregory S, McCulloch J, Sargen K, Vicary P. Developing patient education to enhance recovery after colorectal surgery through action research: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2017; 7 (06) e013498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Cojocaru L, Pahlavan A, Alton S. et al. A prospective cohort study towards improving enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) pathways. medRxiv 2021; DOI: 10.1101/2021.11.07.21265950.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Baluku M, Bajunirwe F, Ngonzi J, Kiwanuka J, Ttendo S. A randomized controlled trial of enhanced recovery after surgery versus standard of care recovery for emergency cesarean deliveries at Mbarara Hospital, Uganda. Anesth Analg 2020; 130 (03) 769-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Mullman L, Hilden P, Goral J. et al. Improved outcomes with an enhanced recovery approach to cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (04) 685-691
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Holland E, Bateman BT, Cole N. et al. Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention that eliminated routine use of opioids after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (01) 91-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Johnson JD, Asiodu IV, McKenzie CP. et al. Racial and ethnic inequities in postpartum pain evaluation and management. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134 (06) 1155-1162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar