CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2023; 56(05): 405-412
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1774385
Systematic Review

Histological Compatibility in Distal Neurotizations: A Systematic Review

1   Department of Hand, Wrist and Microsurgery, Instituto Vita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2   Institute of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sâo Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
1   Department of Hand, Wrist and Microsurgery, Instituto Vita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
2   Institute of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sâo Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
1   Department of Hand, Wrist and Microsurgery, Instituto Vita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
1   Department of Hand, Wrist and Microsurgery, Instituto Vita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Considering the importance of defining the minimum number of axons between recipient and donor branches, that is, the definition of histological compatibility in distal neurotizations for the success of the procedure and the surgeon's freedom to choose individualized strategies for each patient, this systematic review was conducted to find out the most recent studies on the subject. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the importance of the number of axons and the relationship between axon counts in the donor and recipient nerves in the success of nerve transfer. A literature review was performed on five international databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Wiley (Cochrane Database), Embase, and PubMed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed (2020 version), a guide designed to guide the elaboration of systematic literature reviews. One hundred and fifty-seven studies were found, and 23 were selected based on the eligibility criteria. The articles presented were conclusive in determining the importance of the number of axons in the success of nerve transfer. Still, the relationship between the number of axons in the donor and recipient nerves seems more relevant in the success of transfers and is not always explored by the authors. The review of the articles has provided compelling evidence that the number of axons is a critical determinant of the success of nerve transfer procedures. However, the relationship between the number of axons in the donor nerve and that in the recipient nerve appears to be even more crucial for successful transfers, a factor that is not always adequately explored by authors in the existing literature.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study

Note

This study was performed at the Instituto Vita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.


Author Contributions

C.S.C. wrote the original draft of the article, participated in the review, editing process data curation, conducting the research; investigation process; and approval of the final article. J.C.N. contributed to the methodology, and participated in the review, editing process, supervision, and approval of the final article. T.H.W. participated in the review, supervision, and approval of the final article. L.S. contributed to the editing process, validation, and approval of the final article. E.Y.W. contributed to the editing process, validation, and approval of the final article.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. September 2023

© 2023. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Cheah A, Lee EY, Lim AYT. Upper extremity axon counts and clinical implications for motor nerve transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (06) 1044e-1050e
  • 2 Khair MM, Schreiber JJ, Rosenblatt L, Byun DJ, Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Axon counts yield multiple options for triceps fascicular nerve to axillary nerve transfer. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (11) e405-e410
  • 3 Schreiber JJ, Byun DJ, Khair MM, Rosenblatt L, Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Optimal axon counts for brachial plexus nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (01) 135e-141e
  • 4 Jiang BG, Yin XF, Zhang DY, Fu ZG, Zhang HB. Maximum number of collaterals developed by one axon during peripheral nerve regeneration and the influence of that number on reinnervation effects. Eur Neurol 2007; 58 (01) 12-20
  • 5 Costa AL, Papadopulos N, Porzionato A. et al. Studying nerve transfers: searching for a consensus in nerve axons count. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (10) 2731-2736
  • 6 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372 (71) n71
  • 7 Ackley BJ, Swan BA, Ladwig G, Tucker S. Evidence-Based Nursing Care Guidelines: Medical-Surgical Interventions. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2008
  • 8 Kehrer A, Engelmann S, Ruewe M. et al. Perfusion maintains functional potential in denervated mimic muscles in early persistent facial paralysis which requires early microsurgical treatment: the histoanatomic basis of the extratemporal facial nerve trunk assessing axonal load in the context of possible nerve transfers. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2018; 70 (01) 1-13
  • 9 Mohan AT, Suchyta M, Vyas KS, Lachman N, Mardini S, Saint-Cyr M. A cadaveric anatomical and histological study of recipient intercostal nerve selection for sensory reinnervation in autologous breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (02) 136-142
  • 10 Mahmood B, Marshall DC, Wolfe SW, Lee SK, Fufa DT. cadaveric evaluation of myelinated nerve fiber count in the nerve to the gracilis muscle in relation to use as a free functional muscle transfer for elbow flexion. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (05) 311-315
  • 11 Kara M, Bitik O, Üstün GG, Ülkir M, Sargon MF, Aksu AE. A supportive donor nerve for long-term facial paralysis: anatomical analysis of the posterior auricular nerve and micro-anatomical comparison with zygomatic nerve. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75 (02) 773-781
  • 12 Frank K, Englbrecht M, Koban KC. et al. Nerve transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve to the thenar branch of the median nerve: an anatomical and histological analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (05) 751-758
  • 13 Schenck TL, Lin S, Stewart JK. et al. Sensory reanimation of the hand by transfer of the superficial branch of the radial nerve to the median and ulnar nerve. Brain Behav 2016; 6 (12) e00578
  • 14 Colonna MR, Pino D, Battiston B. et al. Distal nerve transfer from the median nerve lumbrical fibers to the distal ulnar nerve motor branches in the palm: an anatomical cadaveric study. Microsurgery 2019; 39 (05) 434-440
  • 15 Pruksakorn D, Sananpanich K, Khunamornpong S, Phudhichareonrat S, Chalidapong P. Posterior approach technique for accessory-suprascapular nerve transfer: a cadaveric study of the anatomical landmarks and number of myelinated axons. Clin Anat 2007; 20 (02) 140-143
  • 16 Luo TD, Wigton MD, Berwick BW. et al. Transfer of the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve for restoration of median nerve sensation: a cadaveric study. Clin Anat 2018; 31 (07) 1006-1012
  • 17 Namazi H, Haji Vandi S. Transfer of extensor digiti minimi and extensor carpi ulnaris nerve branches to the intrinsic motor nerve branches: a histological study on cadaver. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103 (04) 509-511
  • 18 Namazi H, HajiVandi S. Supinator to ulnar nerve transfer via in situ anterior interosseous nerve bridge to restore intrinsic muscle function in combined proximal median and ulnar nerve injury: a novel cadaveric study. J Surg Res 2017; 211: 95-99
  • 19 Hong GH, Liu JB, Liu YZ, Gao KM, Zhao X, Lao J. Modified contralateral C7 nerve transfer: the possibility of permitting ulnar nerve recovery is confirmed by 10 cases of autopsy. Neural Regen Res 2019; 14 (08) 1449-1454
  • 20 Saltzman EB, Krishnan K, Winston MJ, Das De S, Lee SK, Wolfe SW. A cadaveric study on the utility of the levator scapulae motor nerve as a donor for brachial plexus reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 2021; 46 (09) 812.e1-812.e5
  • 21 Gang Y, Wang T, Sheng J, Hou C, Lin H. Anatomical feasibility of transferring the obturator and genitofemoral nerves to repair lumbosacral plexus nerve root avulsion injuries. Clin Anat 2014; 27 (05) 783-788
  • 22 Domeshek LF, Hunter DA, Santosa K. et al. Anatomic characteristics of supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves relevant to their use in corneal neurotization. Eye (Lond) 2019; 33 (03) 398-403
  • 23 Sananpanich K, Kraisarin J, Siriwittayakorn W, Tongprasert S, Suwansirikul S. Double motor nerve transfer for all finger flexion in cervical spinal cord injury: an anatomical study and a clinical report. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (10) 920-926
  • 24 Melamed E, Patel N, Duarte ECW, Nascimento ASCQ, Bertelli JA. Selective transfer of nerve to supinator to restore digital extension in central cord syndrome: an anatomical study and a case report. Microsurgery 2022; 42 (04) 352-359
  • 25 Lin H, Sheng J, Hou C. The effectiveness of contralateral C7 nerve root transfer for the repair of avulsed C7 nerve root in total brachial plexus injury: an experimental study in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (05) 325-330
  • 26 Yan JG, Shen FY, Thayer J. et al. Repair of the musculocutaneous nerve using the vagus nerve as donor by helicoid end-to-side technique: an experimental study in rats. J Neurosci Res 2017; 95 (12) 2493-2499