Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2024; 18(03): 815-819
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1774327
Original Article

Compressive Strength of Newly Developed Nonsintered Hydroxyapatite Blocks for Bone Graft Applications

Sunarso Sunarso 
1   Departement of Dental Materials Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Abdi Suryadi
2   Department of Dental Materials Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Decky Joesiana Indrani
1   Departement of Dental Materials Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Azizah Intan Pangesty
3   Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, UI Campus, Depok, West Java, Indonesia
› Author Affiliations Funding This research is funded by the Directorate of Research and Development, Universitas Indonesia under Hibah PUTI Q2 2022 (Grant No. NKB-614/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2022).
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to fabricate and evaluate the phase purity and compressive strength of the nonsintered hydroxyapatite (HA) block obtained via phase transformation of set calcium sulfate dihydrate (CSD) block under hydrothermal conditions at different temperatures.

Materials and Methods Nonsintered HA block was prepared by immersion CSD block (4 mm in diameter and 8 mm in height) in a 1 mol/L sodium phosphate (Na3PO4) solution under hydrothermal conditions at 100°C, 140°C, and 180°C for 48 hours. X-ray diffraction was used to determine the crystalline phase of the obtained blocks. The mechanical strength of the blocks was measured using a compressive strength test.

Results The result shows that the CSD block could be fully transformed into a HA block at 180°C for 48 hours without changing its macroscopic shape. The compressive strength of the obtained blocks was lower compared with the CSD block.

Conclusion The current method has successfully produced a nonsintered HA block at 180°C for 48 hours. The compressive strength of the HA block decreased compared with the gypsum block used as a precursor. However, the compressive strength of the HA block that was produced still falls within the range of cancellous bone.

Keywords

nonsintered - hydroxyapatite - block - hydrothermal - compressive strength


Publication History

Article published online:
23 November 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Kumar P, Vinitha B, Fathima G. Bone grafts in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013; 5 (Suppl. 01) S125-S127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Manley MT, Feinberg JR. Hydroxyapatite in total hip arthroplasty. Clinical results and critical issues. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (355) 200-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Orlovskii VP, Komlev VS, Barinov SM. Hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-based ceramics. Inorg Mater 2002; 38 (10) 973-984
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schorn L, Fienitz T, De Donno F. et al. Critical-size defect augmentation using sintered and non-sintered bovine bone matrix - an experimental controlled study in minipigs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 79 (09) 1866-1873
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ayukawa Y, Suzuki Y, Tsuru K, Koyano K, Ishikawa K. Histological comparison in rats between carbonate apatite fabricated from gypsum and sintered hydroxyapatite on bone remodeling. BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 579541
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Narukawa M, Suzuki O, Mayahara M. et al. Resorption analysis of deproteinized cancellous bovine bone. Dent Mater J 2020; 39 (05) 760-765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hämmerle CH, Chiantella GC, Karring T, Lang NP. The effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9 (03) 151-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Baldini N, De Sanctis M, Ferrari M. Deproteinized bovine bone in periodontal and implant surgery. Dent Mater 2011; 27 (01) 61-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Tadjoedin ES, de Lange GL, Bronckers AL, Lyaruu DM, Burger EH. Deproteinized cancellous bovine bone (Bio-Oss) as bone substitute for sinus floor elevation. A retrospective, histomorphometrical study of five cases. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30 (03) 261-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Suzuki Y, Matsuya S, Udoh K. et al. Fabrication of hydroxyapatite block from gypsum block based on (NH4)2HPO4 treatment. Dent Mater J 2005; 24 (04) 515-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sunarso R, Qalbina T, Indrani DJ, Herda E, Pangesty AI. Effect of hydrothermal temperature on phase transformation and mechanical property of non-sintered hydroxyapatite and its in vitro solubility. J Korean Ceram Soc. 2023; 60 (01) 215-223
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Pepla E, Besharat LK, Palaia G, Tenore G, Migliau G. Nano-hydroxyapatite and its applications in preventive, restorative and regenerative dentistry: a review of literature. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2014; 5 (03) 108-114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Balhuc S, Campian R, Labunet A, Negucioiu M, Buduru S, Kui A. Dental applications of systems based on hydroxyapatite nanoparticles—an evidence-based update. Crystals (Basel) 2021; 11 (06) 674
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mazumder S, Nayak AK, Ara TJ, Hasnain MS. Hydroxyapatite composites for dentistry. In: Asiri AM. , Inamuddin, Muhammad A. eds. Applications of Nanocomposite Materials in Dentistry. United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing; 2019: 123-143
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Izzetti R, Gennai S, Nisi M, Gulia F, Miceli M, Giuca MR. Clinical applications of nano-hydroxyapatite in dentistry. Appl Sci (Basel) 2022; 12 (21) 10762
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kim RW, Kim JH, Moon SY. Effect of hydroxyapatite on critical-sized defect. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 38 (01) 26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Shaikh MS, Husain S, Lone MA, Lone MA, Akhlaq H, Zafar MS. Clinical effectiveness of anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix/cell-binding peptide grafts for regeneration of periodontal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Regen Med 2020; 15 (12) 2379-2395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Antoun H, Eid J, Zouiten O. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis at 26 months of a bovine hydroxyapatite maxillary sinus graft: a case report. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2018; 38 (04) 557-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zubaidah N, Kurnati S, Febrianti NN, Nurdianto AR, Oktaria W, Luthfi M. The pattern of osteocyte in dental socket bone regenerative induced by hydroxyapatite bovine tooth graft. Bali Med J 2022; 11 (03) 1489-1493
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 van Gestel NAP, Schuiringa GH, Hennissen JHPH. et al. Resorption of the calcium phosphate layer on S53P4 bioactive glass by osteoclasts. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2019; 30 (08) 94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ishikawa K, Miyamoto Y, Tsuchiya A, Hayashi K, Tsuru K, Ohe G. Physical and histological comparison of hydroxyapatite, carbonate apatite, and β-tricalcium phosphate bone substitutes. Materials (Basel) 2018; 11 (10) 1993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ishikawa K. Bone substitute fabrication based on dissolution-precipitation reactions. Materials (Basel) 2010; 3 (02) 1138-1155
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gerhardt LC, Boccaccini AR. Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials (Basel) 2010; 3 (07) 3867-3910
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar