Homœopathic Links 2023; 36(04): 281-286
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772239
Original Article

A Randomized Trial of Three Homeopathic Drugs: Rauwolfia serpentina, Viscum album, and Spartium scoparium in Essential Hypertension

1   Department of Homoeopathic Pharmacy, D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
,
2   D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
,
3   Department of Practice of Medicine, D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
,
4   Department of Surgery, D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
,
5   Department of Organon of Medicine and Homoeopathic Philosophy, D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
,
6   Deptartment of Community Medicine, D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India
,
7   Department of Homoeopathy, East Bishnupur State Homoeopathic Dispensary, Chandi Daulatabad Block Primary Health Centre, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal, under Department of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of West Bengal, India
,
8   Department of Repertory, D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Hypertension (HTN) remains one of the major risk factors for heart failure, stroke, and coronary heart disease worldwide. This study was undertaken to compare the antihypertensive effects produced by the mother tinctures (MTs) of three homeopathic drugs—Rauwolfia serpentina (RS), Viscum album (VA), and Spartium scoparium (SS; also known as Cytisus scoparius [CS]) in essential hypertension. This open-label, randomized, three parallel arm, pragmatic, pilot trial was conducted on 60 participants with essential hypertension in the outpatient department of D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata. Participants were randomized into three groups: RS, VA, and SS equally. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured at baseline and after 30 and 60 minutes. Group differences at different time points and overall were measured using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and three-way repeated measure ANOVA models, respectively, after adjusting for baseline differences using intention-to-treat approaches. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Endpoint analysis included 60 participants. Although the highest mean reductions in SBP and DBP with time were achieved in the RS group, all three medicines revealed similar antihypertensive effects without any significant differences (SBP: F 2, 57 = 1.710, p = 0.190; DBP: F 2, 57 = 0.732, p = 0.485). No harm or serious adverse events were reported from either of the groups. All three medicines (RS, VA, and SS) produced similar antihypertensive effects in essential hypertension.

Trial registration: CTRI/2021/02/031548; UTN: U1111–1264–6856.

Author Contributions

D.M., S.M., and S.K.M. were responsible for concept development and literature search. D.M., S.M., A.R.S., S.A., and P.G. contributed to clinical study and data acquisition. P.G., M.K., and S.S. were responsible for the concept, study design, data interpretation, statistical analysis, and preparation of the article. All the authors reviewed and approved the final version of the article.


Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Article published online:
16 October 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India