CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Pediatr Intensive Care
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771519
Original Article

Barriers to Adherence of Early Mobilization Protocols in the Pediatric Intensive Care Units

1   Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, United States
2   Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States
,
1   Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Valerie Kalinowski
1   Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Marylouise Wilkerson
1   Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Children who survive critical illness suffer many sequelae of prolonged hospitalization. National guidelines recommend pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) employ ICU care bundles to combat acquired delirium, pain, and weakness. While the use of early mobility (EM) protocols has increased in PICUs, there remain challenges with adherence. The aim of this study is to better understand perceived barriers to EM in the PICU before and after introducing an EM protocol. We hypothesized that providers would be most concerned about the safety of EM. This pre–post-survey study was conducted at a single-center tertiary PICU. A total of 94 PICU providers were included in this study, including nurses, physicians, and therapists. Responses were collected anonymously. Survey respondents consented to participation. The initial survey was conducted prior to enacting an EM protocol to gauge knowledge and opinions surrounding EM. Based on the results, education regarding EM was performed by a multidisciplinary team. An EM protocol “Move Jr.” was initiated. Four months postinitiation, a follow-up survey was sent to the same cohort of providers to determine knowledge of the protocol, changes in opinions, as well as barriers to the implementation of EM. While providers believed that EM was beneficial for patients and were interested in implementing an EM protocol, the initial top three perceived barriers to EM were risk of inadvertent extubation, risk of inadvertent loss of central lines, and time constraints. Four months after the initiation of the EM protocol, a follow-up survey revealed that the top three perceived barriers of EM had changed to time constraints, increased workload, and level of sedation. After 4 months, the change in perceived barriers suggests greater acceptance of the safety of EM but challenges in application. Survey responses describe a desire to perform EM exercises but difficulty finding time. Understanding of the protocol also differed among providers. Greater collaboration among providers could lead to more cohesive therapy plans. There was a clear benefit in educating providers to consider EM as a priority in patient care.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 26 May 2023

Accepted: 15 June 2023

Article published online:
10 August 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Fletcher SN, Kennedy DD, Ghosh IR. et al. Persistent neuromuscular and neurophysiologic abnormalities in long-term survivors of prolonged critical illness. Crit Care Med 2003; 31 (04) 1012-1016
  • 2 Hough CL, Needham DM. The role of future longitudinal studies in ICU survivors: understanding determinants and pathophysiology of weakness and neuromuscular dysfunction. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007; 13 (05) 489-496
  • 3 Hopkins RO, Choong K, Zebuhr CA, Kudchadkar SR. Transforming PICU culture to facilitate early rehabilitation. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2015; 4 (04) 204-211
  • 4 Tsuboi N, Hiratsuka M, Kaneko S. et al. Benefits of early mobilization after pediatric liver transplantation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2019; 20 (02) e91-e97
  • 5 Engel HJ, Needham DM, Morris PE, Gropper MA. ICU early mobilization: from recommendation to implementation at three medical centers. Crit Care Med 2013; 41 (9, Suppl 1): S69-S80
  • 6 Choong K, Foster G, Fraser DD. et al; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Acute rehabilitation practices in critically ill children: a multicenter study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2014; 15 (06) e270-e279
  • 7 Van Damme D, Flori H, Owens T. Development of medical criteria for mobilizing a pediatric patient in the PICU. Crit Care Nurs Q 2018; 41 (03) 323-329
  • 8 Munkwitz M, Hopkins RO, Miller Iii RR, Luckett PM, Hirshberg EL. A perspective on early mobilization for adult patients with respiratory failure: lessons for the pediatric population. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2010; 3 (03) 215-227
  • 9 Stevens RD, Dowdy DW, Michaels RK, Mendez-Tellez PA, Pronovost PJ, Needham DM. Neuromuscular dysfunction acquired in critical illness: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33 (11) 1876-1891
  • 10 Bybee J, Sorce L, Ciolino J, Bone M. Mobility practices in the PICU. Crit Care Med 2015; 43 (12) 213-214
  • 11 Choong K, Chacon MDP, Walker RG. et al. In-bed mobilization in critically ill children: a safety and feasibility trial. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2015; 4 (04) 225-234
  • 12 Knoester H, Bronner MB, Bos AP. Surviving pediatric intensive care: physical outcome after 3 months. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34 (06) 1076-1082
  • 13 Cameron S, Ball I, Cepinskas G. et al. Early mobilization in the critical care unit: A review of adult and pediatric literature. J Crit Care 2015; 30 (04) 664-672
  • 14 Cuello-Garcia CA, Mai SHC, Simpson R, Al-Harbi S, Choong K. Early mobilization in critically ill children: a systematic review. J Pediatr 2018; 203: 25-33.e6
  • 15 Choong K, Koo KK, Clark H. et al. Early mobilization in critically ill children: a survey of Canadian practice. Crit Care Med 2013; 41 (07) 1745-1753
  • 16 Hanna ES, Zhao S, Shannon CN, Betters KA. Changes in provider perceptions regarding early mobility in the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21 (01) e30-e38
  • 17 Smith HAB, Besunder JB, Betters KA. et al. 2022 Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients With Consideration of the ICU Environment and Early Mobility. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23 (02) e74-e110
  • 18 Betters KA, Hebbar KB, Farthing D. et al. Development and implementation of an early mobility program for mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. J Crit Care 2017; 41: 303-308
  • 19 Choong K, Canci F, Clark H. et al. Practice recommendations for early mobilization in critically ill children. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2018; 7 (01) 14-26
  • 20 Wieczorek B, Ascenzi J, Kim Y. et al. PICU Up!. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2016; 17 (12) e559-e566
  • 21 Wieczorek B, Burke C, Al-Harbi A, Kudchadkar SR. Early mobilization in the pediatric intensive care unit: a systematic review. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2015; 2015 (04) 129-170
  • 22 Joyce CL, Taipe C, Sobin B. et al. Provider beliefs regarding early mobilization in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr Nurs 2018; 38: 15-19