The Impact of COVID-19 on Breast Reconstruction: A Nationwide Analysis Utilizing NSQIP

Abstract

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic prompted an unprecedented contraction in surgical volume. This utilizes the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to assess the impact of COVID-19 on breast reconstruction surgery volume and quality throughout 2020.

Methods The NSQIP database was utilized to gather data from 2015 to 2020. We provide descriptive statistics in the form of mean (standard deviation), median (interquartile range), and range for continuous variables and counts (%) for categorical variables. A Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare average age and a chi-squared test was used to compare other demographic categorical variables from 2019 to 2020.

Results Breast reconstruction procedures decreased by 27% in Q2 2020 compared to Q2 of 2019. Immediate tissue-expander-based reconstruction was the only type of reconstruction that increased in comparison to Q2 2019 values (53.5 vs. 41.1%, p < 0.001). Rates of delayed direct to implant reconstruction was decreased (12.8 vs. 17.5%, p < 0.001) and free flap-based breast reconstruction decreased, including immediate free flap reconstruction (5.3 vs. 9%, p < 0.001) and delayed free flap reconstruction (5.7 vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001). Immediate direct to implant reconstruction rates were unchanged. In terms of surgical quality, there were no statistically significant increases in postoperative complications, readmissions, or reoperations.

Conclusion Breast reconstruction surgery was heavily impacted in Q2 of 2020 with a 27% decrease in total surgical volume. There was an increase in immediate tissue-expander-based reconstruction and decrease in rates of both direct to implant and free-flap based reconstruction. Surgical quality and outcomes remained unchanged through the pandemic.

Keywords

reconstruction - breast - quality - volume - COVID-19

Publication History

Received: 07 September 2022

Accepted: 02 May 2023

Article published online:
20 July 2023

• References

• 1 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CMS adult elective surgery and procedures recommendations: Limit all non-essential planned surgeries and procedures, including dental, until further notice. Accessed June 08, 2023 at: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-releases-recommendations-adult-elective-surgeries-non-essential-medical-surgical-and-dental
• 2 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. ASPS Statement on Breast Reconstruction in the face of COVID-19 Pandemic. Accessed June 08, 2023 at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/medical-professionals/COVID19-Breast-Reconstruction-Statement.pdf
• 3 Schoenbrunner AR, Sarac BA, Janis JE. A summary of recommendations for plastic surgeons during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (07) e3039 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003039.
• 4 Sarac BA, Schoenbrunner AR, Wilson SC, Chiu ES, Janis JE. The impact of COVID-19-based suspension of surgeries on plastic surgery practices: a survey of ACAPS members. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (08) e3119 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003119.
• 5 Shibata D, Kawate T, Komiya T, Nakamura I, Ishikawa T, Matsumura H. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast surgery and breast reconstruction in a Japanese university hospital setting. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49 (01) 132-136
• 6 Illmann CF, Doherty C, Wheelock M. et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast reconstruction: a Canadian perspective. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2021; 29 (04) 287-293
• 7 Faulkner HR, Coopey SB, Liao EC, Specht M, Smith BL, Colwell AS. The safety of performing breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Breast Cancer 2022; 29 (02) 242-246
• 8 Hemal K, Boyd CJ, Bekisz JM, Salibian AA, Choi M, Karp NS. Breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (09) e3852 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003852.
• 9 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File. American College of Surgeons. Accessed June 08, 2023 at: http://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip/participant-use
• 10 Jallali N, Hunter JE, Henry FP. et al. The feasibility and safety of immediate breast reconstruction in the COVID-19 era. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (11) 1917-1923
• 11 Huang H, Fu RH, Vartanian E, Du JY, Otterburn DM. An argument for the safety of immediate device reconstruction following mastectomy during the COVID-19 crisis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (05) e3627 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003627.
• 12 Khoo A, Kroll SS, Reece GP. et al. A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (04) 964-968 , discussion 969–970
• 13 Perez-Alvarez IM, Bartholomew AJ, King CA. et al. Breast surgery in the time of global pandemic: benefits of same-day surgery for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction during COVID-19. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (04) 522e-523e
• 14 Vuong B, Graff-Baker AN, Yanagisawa M. et al. Implementation of a post-mastectomy home recovery program in a large, integrated health care delivery system. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (10) 3178-3184
• 15 Schwartz JC. Mastectomy and prepectoral reconstruction in an ambulatory surgery center reduces major infectious complication rates. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (07) e2960 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002960.
• 16 Ho W, Köhler G, Haywood RM, Rosich-Medina A, Masud D. Microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction in the midst of a pandemic: a single-unit COVID-19 experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75 (01) 112-117
• 17 Holoyda KA, Magno-Padron DA, Carter GC, Agarwal JP, Kwok AC. National trends in length of stay for microvascular breast reconstruction: an evaluation of 10,465 cases using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (02) 306-313
• 18 Batdorf NJ, Lemaine V, Lovely JK. et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (03) 395-402