Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e2230-e2237
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771018
Original Article

PROMPT: Prospective Meta-analysis for Pessary Trials Study Protocol

Elizabeth A. Thom   †
1   The George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia
,
George R. Saade
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
,
Lisa M. Askie
3   National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
,
Lynda G. Ugwu
1   The George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Ben W.J. Mol 
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Monash, Australia
,
Christophe Vayssiere
5   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toulouse III University, Toulouse, France
,
Jane E. Norman
6   University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
,
Eva Pajkrt
7   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Rebecca G. Clifton
1   The George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Joseph R. Biggio
8   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Catherine Arnaud
5   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toulouse III University, Toulouse, France
,
Vincenzo Berghella
9   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Maria G. Canino
10   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
,
Elena Carreras
10   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
,
Lorraine Dugoff
11   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Matthew K. Hoffman 
12   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Rodolfo C. Pacagnella
13   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas—UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Uma M. Reddy
14   Division of Extramural Research Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland
,
Gabriele Saccone
15   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
,
Janneke van 't Hooft
7   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Vinh Q. Dang
16   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, My Duc Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
,
for the Prospective Meta-analysis for Pessary Trials Collaboration › Author Affiliations Funding Each individual trial has received funding from its own individual funding body. The Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD MFMU Network Data Coordinating Center is serving as the data coordinating center for this collaboration.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Preterm birth, defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation, is a leading cause of perinatal and infant mortality throughout the world. Preterm birth is also associated with long-term neurological disabilities and other significant health issues in children. A short cervix in the second trimester has been noted to be one of the strongest predictors of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth in both singleton and multiple pregnancies. Some studies have shown that cervical support in the form of an Arabin pessary lowers the risk of preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation and short cervical length; however, other studies have conflicting results. Our objective was to form an international collaborative of planned or ongoing randomized trials of pessary in singleton and twin gestations with a short cervix.

Study Design In November 2014, an international group of investigators, who had initiated or were planning randomized trials of pessary for pregnant people with a short cervix and singleton or twin gestation to prevent preterm birth, formed a collaboration to plan a prospective individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomized trials (PROspective Meta-analysis of Pessary Trials [PROMPT]). The PROMPT investigators agreed on meta-analysis IPD hypotheses for singletons and twins, eligibility criteria, and a set of core baseline and outcome measures. The primary outcome is a composite of fetal death or preterm delivery before 32 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes include maternal and neonatal morbidities. The PROMPT protocol may be viewed as a written agreement among the study investigators who make up the PROMPT consortium (PROSPERO ID# CRD42018067740).

Results Results will be published in phases as the individual participating studies are concluded and published. Results of the first phase of singleton and twin pessary trials are expected to be available in late 2022. Updates are planned as participating trials are completed and published.

Key Points

  • Short cervical length predicts preterm birth.

  • Results of prior cervical pessary trials are mixed.

  • Meta-analysis of pessary trials protocol.

Keywords

pessary - short cervix - prospective meta-analysis - protocol

Note

Results of the first phase of singleton and twin pessary trials are expected to be available late 2022, with updates planned as participating trials are completed and published.


Ethical Approval

All individual trials are required to have a consent form approved by the local ethics board before trial start-up, and all participants provide consent.


† Deceased




Publication History

Received: 11 December 2022

Accepted: 30 May 2023

Article published online:
10 July 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D. et al; Born Too Soon Preterm Birth Action Group. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health 2013; 10 (Suppl 1, Suppl 1): S2-S2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D. et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000-13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 2015; 385 (9966): 430-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 127: management of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (06) 1308-1317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Andersen HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, Hayashi RH. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163 (03) 859-867
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Miodovnik M. et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175 (4 Pt 1): 1047-1053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Hassan SS, Yeo L. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (02) 128.e1-128.e12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A. et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (02) 124.e1-124.e19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, El-Refaie W. et al. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49 (03) 303-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, Rehal A. et al. Vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations with a short cervix: an updated individual patient data meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 59 (02) 263-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 4: CD008991
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106 (01) 181-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Saccone G, Rust O, Althuisius S, Roman A, Berghella V. Cerclage for short cervix in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials using individual patient-level data. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015; 94 (04) 352-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cross RG. Treatment of habitual abortion due to cervical incompetence. Lancet 1959; 274 (7094): 127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Arabin B, Halbesma JR, Vork F, Hübener M, van Eyck J. Is treatment with vaginal pessaries an option in patients with a sonographically detected short cervix?. J Perinat Med 2003; 31 (02) 122-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Goya M, Pratcorona L, Merced C, Rodo C, Valle L, Romero A. et al. Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1800-1806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Liem S, Schuit E, Hegeman M. et al. Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382 (9901): 1341-1349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hui SYA, Chor CM, Lau TK, Lao TT, Leung TY. Cerclage pessary for preventing preterm birth in women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix at 20 to 24 weeks: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30 (04) 283-288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Nicolaides KH, Syngelaki A, Poon LC. et al. Cervical pessary placement for prevention of preterm birth in unselected twin pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214 (01) 3 :e1–e9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Nicolaides KH, Syngelaki A, Poon LC. et al. A randomized trial of a cervical pessary to prevent preterm singleton birth. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (11) 1044-1052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 van 't Hooft J, Duffy JMN, Daly M. et al; Global Obstetrics Network (GONet). A core outcome set for evaluation of interventions to prevent preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127 (01) 49-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 van 't Hooft J, Alfirevic Z, Asztalos EV. et al. CROWN initiative and preterm birth prevention: researchers and editors commit to implement core outcome sets. BJOG 2018; 125 (01) 8-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar